• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估血糖控制质量:使用移动自我血糖监测系统评估低血糖和高血糖以及血糖变异性。

Assessing quality of glycemic control: Hypo- and hyperglycemia, and glycemic variability using mobile self-monitoring of blood glucose system.

机构信息

Mackay Medical College, New Taipei City.

出版信息

Health Informatics J. 2020 Mar;26(1):287-297. doi: 10.1177/1460458218824756. Epub 2019 Jan 29.

DOI:10.1177/1460458218824756
PMID:30693833
Abstract

Although mobile applications bring potential benefits of metabolic control for patients with diabetes, their effect on glycemic fluctuation has been less widely explored. The goal of this study was to utilize data from the Mobile Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose System to obtain a picture of the metabolic progression. Twenty-seven adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus were recruited to receive a mobile diabetes self-care system for a six-week period. The approach to the interpretation of glycemic control patterns, utilizes the following methods: 1) Graphical displays of the percentage of hyper-and-hypoglycemia episodes; 2) Pattern recognition of glycemic variability based on a simple equation involving both the standard deviation and the mean. Analytical results reveal that short-term usage of the developed system stabilizes the week-by-week glycemic fluctuations. Four categories were established to distinguish different patterns of patients' glycemic variation. If patterns of glycemic control can be recognized or interpreted by newly designed mobile applications, then the collection and analysis of metabolic variation will greatly help both health care providers and patients in effective diabetes management.

摘要

尽管移动应用程序为糖尿病患者带来了潜在的代谢控制益处,但它们对血糖波动的影响尚未得到广泛探讨。本研究的目的是利用来自移动自我监测血糖系统的数据来了解代谢进展情况。招募了 27 名 2 型糖尿病患者,在六周内使用移动糖尿病自我护理系统。解释血糖控制模式的方法如下:1)以图形方式显示高血糖和低血糖发作的百分比;2)基于涉及标准差和平均值的简单方程对血糖变异性进行模式识别。分析结果表明,该系统的短期使用可稳定每周的血糖波动。建立了四个类别来区分患者血糖变化的不同模式。如果可以通过新设计的移动应用程序识别或解释血糖控制模式,那么代谢变化的收集和分析将极大地帮助医疗保健提供者和患者进行有效的糖尿病管理。

相似文献

1
Assessing quality of glycemic control: Hypo- and hyperglycemia, and glycemic variability using mobile self-monitoring of blood glucose system.评估血糖控制质量:使用移动自我血糖监测系统评估低血糖和高血糖以及血糖变异性。
Health Informatics J. 2020 Mar;26(1):287-297. doi: 10.1177/1460458218824756. Epub 2019 Jan 29.
2
Glucose Variability: A Review of Clinical Applications and Research Developments.血糖变异性:临床应用及研究进展综述。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2018 Jun;20(S2):S25-S215. doi: 10.1089/dia.2018.0092.
3
Evaluating quality of glycemic control: graphical displays of hypo- and hyperglycemia, time in target range, and mean glucose.评估血糖控制质量:低血糖和高血糖的图形展示、目标范围内时间以及平均血糖水平。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2015 Jan;9(1):56-62. doi: 10.1177/1932296814551046. Epub 2014 Oct 14.
4
Digital Diabetes Management Application Improves Glycemic Outcomes in People With Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes.数字糖尿病管理应用程序改善1型和2型糖尿病患者的血糖结果。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2018 May;12(3):701-708. doi: 10.1177/1932296817747291. Epub 2017 Dec 25.
5
Evaluation of the Average Daily Risk Range as a Measure of Glycemic Variability in Youths with Type 1 Diabetes.评估平均每日风险范围作为1型糖尿病青少年血糖变异性的一种衡量指标。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2015 Nov;17(11):795-800. doi: 10.1089/dia.2015.0061.
6
The effect of beta-glucan supplementation on glycemic control and variability in adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus.β-葡聚糖补充对 1 型糖尿病青少年血糖控制和变异性的影响。
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2020 Nov;169:108464. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2020.108464. Epub 2020 Sep 21.
7
Continuous Glucose Monitoring: A Review of Recent Studies Demonstrating Improved Glycemic Outcomes.持续血糖监测:近期研究综述显示血糖结果得到改善
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2017 Jun;19(S3):S25-S37. doi: 10.1089/dia.2017.0035.
8
Metrics to Evaluate Quality of Glycemic Control: Comparison of Time in Target, Hypoglycemic, and Hyperglycemic Ranges with "Risk Indices".评估血糖控制质量的指标:目标范围内时间、低血糖和高血糖范围与“风险指数”的比较。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2018 May;20(5):325-334. doi: 10.1089/dia.2017.0416.
9
Effect of a Mobile Phone-Based Glucose-Monitoring and Feedback System for Type 2 Diabetes Management in Multiple Primary Care Clinic Settings: Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.基于手机的血糖监测和反馈系统对多基层医疗机构 2 型糖尿病管理的效果:集群随机对照试验。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Feb 26;8(2):e16266. doi: 10.2196/16266.
10
The Impact of Physical Activity on Glycemic Variability Assessed by Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review.《体力活动对 2 型糖尿病患者连续血糖监测评估的血糖变异性的影响:系统评价》。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2020 Jul 31;11:486. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2020.00486. eCollection 2020.

引用本文的文献

1
Patterns of Glycemic Variability During a Diabetes Self-Management Educational Program.糖尿病自我管理教育项目期间的血糖变异性模式
Med Sci (Basel). 2019 Mar 25;7(3):52. doi: 10.3390/medsci7030052.