Suppr超能文献

肝硬化中肝细胞癌与其他肝脏恶性肿瘤的比较:LI-RADS 版本 2018 的表现。

Hepatocellular Carcinoma versus Other Hepatic Malignancy in Cirrhosis: Performance of LI-RADS Version 2018.

机构信息

From the Department of Radiology (Y.Y.K., M.J.K., C.A.) and Biostatistics Collaboration Unit, Department of Biomedical Systems Informatics (E.H.K., Y.H.R.), Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seodaemun-gu Yonsei-ro 50-1, Seoul 03722, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Radiology. 2019 Apr;291(1):72-80. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2019181995. Epub 2019 Jan 29.

Abstract

Purpose To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) version 2018 for differentiating between hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and other (hepatic) malignancy (OM) in patients with liver cirrhosis. Materials and Methods From 2008 to 2017, 55 patients with untreated OM and liver cirrhosis were eligible for this retrospective case-control study (mean age, 58 years ± 10 [standard deviation] [range, 32-79 years], with 45 men [mean age, 58 years ± 11] and 10 women [mean age, 62 years ± 7]). Control subjects consisted of 165 treatment-naive patients with HCC and liver cirrhosis (mean age, 58 years ± 10 [range, 29-80 years], with 134 men [mean age, 58 years ± 9] and 31 women [mean age, 59 years ± 11]). Two radiologists blinded to the final diagnosis independently determined the presence of LR-M features and major HCC features (non-rim arterial phase hyperenhancement, non-peripheral washout, and enhancing capsule). The diagnostic performances of each feature, the LR-M criteria (probably or definitely malignant, but not specific for HCC), and the LR-5 criteria (definitely HCC) were calculated and compared by using the generalized estimating equation method. Results Individual LR-M features had a sensitivity of 9%-71% and a specificity of 83%-97% for the diagnosis of OM. Major features of HCC had a sensitivity of 62%-83% and a specificity of 69%-89% for the diagnosis of HCC. The LR-M criteria had a sensitivity of 89% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 81%, 97%) for diagnosing OM, with a specificity of 48% (95% CI: 40%, 56%). The LR-5 criteria had a sensitivity of 74% (95% CI: 67%, 81%) for diagnosing HCC, with a specificity of 89% (95% CI: 81%, 97%). The accuracy of the LR-5 criteria was higher than that of the LR-M criteria (78% [95% CI: 72%, 83%] vs 58% [95% CI: 52%, 65%], P <. 001). Conclusion The LR-5 criteria as well as the LR-M criteria can effectively distinguish hepatocellular carcinoma from other hepatic malignancy in patients with liver cirrhosis. © RSNA, 2019 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Furlan in this issue.

摘要

目的 评估肝脏影像报告和数据系统(LI-RADS)版本 2018 对于区分肝硬化患者肝细胞癌(HCC)与其他(肝脏)恶性肿瘤(OM)的诊断准确性。

材料与方法 本回顾性病例对照研究于 2008 年至 2017 年纳入 55 例未经治疗的 OM 合并肝硬化患者(平均年龄 58 岁±10[标准差] [范围,32-79 岁],其中 45 例男性[平均年龄 58 岁±11]和 10 例女性[平均年龄 62 岁±7])。对照组由 165 例未经治疗的 HCC 合并肝硬化患者组成(平均年龄 58 岁±10[范围,29-80 岁],其中 134 例男性[平均年龄 58 岁±9]和 31 例女性[平均年龄 59 岁±11])。两位放射科医生在不知道最终诊断的情况下,分别独立确定 LR-M 特征和主要 HCC 特征(非边缘动脉期强化、非外周洗脱和强化包膜)的存在情况。使用广义估计方程法计算并比较了每个特征、LR-M 标准(可能或明确恶性,但不是 HCC 特异性)和 LR-5 标准(明确 HCC)的诊断性能。

结果 单独的 LR-M 特征对于 OM 的诊断,其敏感性为 9%-71%,特异性为 83%-97%。HCC 的主要特征对于 HCC 的诊断,其敏感性为 62%-83%,特异性为 69%-89%。LR-M 标准对于 OM 的诊断具有 89%(95%置信区间[CI]:81%,97%)的敏感性,特异性为 48%(95% CI:40%,56%)。LR-5 标准对于 HCC 的诊断具有 74%(95% CI:67%,81%)的敏感性,特异性为 89%(95% CI:81%,97%)。LR-5 标准的准确性高于 LR-M 标准(78%[95% CI:72%,83%]比 58%[95% CI:52%,65%],P<.001)。

结论 在肝硬化患者中,LR-5 标准和 LR-M 标准均可有效区分 HCC 与其他肝脏恶性肿瘤。

©RSNA,2019

在线补充材料可在本文中获取。另请参阅本期杂志中 Furlan 的社论。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验