Education Department, University of Costa Rica, San Ramón, Alajuela, Costa Rica.
School of Kinesiology, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 29;14(1):e0210447. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210447. eCollection 2019.
The present study examined changes in body composition, maximum oxygen uptake, and physical activity in sedentary office employees prescribed with two different walking programs during a 10-week intervention.
68 sedentary employees were randomly assigned to one of three groups: multiple bouts of walking (n = 24 (5 male, 19 female) Age = 46±9, BMI = 30.5±5.78 kg/m2), continuous walking (n = 22 (6 male, 16 female) Age = 48±9, BMI = 30.6±6.2 kg/m2) and the control group (n = 22 (5 male, 17 female) Age = 42±10, BMI = 27.5±5.23 kg/m2). Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (iDXA) assessed body composition and a Bruce protocol treadmill test assessed aerobic fitness at baseline and week 11. At baseline, week 6 and week 11 a waist worn accelerometer measured physical activity and sedentary behavior. Physical activity was measured throughout the program with a wrist worn accelerometer.
The results from the mixed-design ANOVA show that fat mass (p < .000) and fat percentage (p < .000) decreased for all three groups as a main effect of time. Sedentary behavior did not change (p>0.05) for all three groups. Moderate intensity physical activity increased significantly from pre-test to week 6 (p<0.05), then decreased from week 6 to post-test (p<0.05), with no significant changes observed from pre-test to post-test (p>0.05) for all groups. No changes in VO2 were observed (p>0.05) for all groups.
Continuous or intermittent walking activity produce similar benefits on body weight, fat mass and body fat percentage in sedentary employees. Meanwhile, intermittent walking allowed these sedentary employees to increase lean mass and fat free mass. Intermittent walking could provide at least similar benefits on body composition compared to a continuous walking program.
本研究旨在探讨在 10 周干预期间,为久坐的办公室员工开出两种不同步行方案后,其身体成分、最大摄氧量和身体活动的变化情况。
将 68 名久坐的员工随机分配到以下三组中的一组:多次散步组(n=24(5 男,19 女)年龄=46±9,BMI=30.5±5.78kg/m2)、连续散步组(n=22(6 男,16 女)年龄=48±9,BMI=30.6±6.2kg/m2)和对照组(n=22(5 男,17 女)年龄=42±10,BMI=27.5±5.23kg/m2)。双能 X 射线吸收法(iDXA)评估身体成分,布鲁斯方案跑步机测试评估有氧适能,均在基线和第 11 周进行。在基线、第 6 周和第 11 周,佩戴在腰部的加速度计测量身体活动和久坐行为。在整个方案中,佩戴在手腕上的加速度计测量身体活动。
混合设计方差分析的结果表明,所有三组的脂肪量(p<.000)和体脂百分比(p<.000)均随时间的主要效应而降低。所有三组的久坐行为均无变化(p>.05)。中等强度的身体活动从预测试到第 6 周显著增加(p<.05),然后从第 6 周到后测试减少(p<.05),所有三组从预测试到后测试均无显著变化(p>.05)。所有三组的 VO2 均无变化(p>.05)。
连续或间歇性步行活动对久坐员工的体重、脂肪量和体脂百分比均产生相似的益处。同时,间歇性步行使这些久坐的员工增加了瘦体重和去脂体重。与连续步行方案相比,间歇性步行可能对身体成分具有至少相似的益处。