Suppr超能文献

工作空间紊乱不影响创造力和执行功能。

Workspace Disorder Does Not Influence Creativity and Executive Functions.

作者信息

Manzi Alberto, Durmysheva Yana, Pinegar Shannon K, Rogers Andrew, Ramos Justine

机构信息

School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Mercy College, Dobbs Ferry, NY, United States.

Borough of Manhattan Community College, City University of New York, New York, NY, United States.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2019 Jan 15;9:2662. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02662. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

Recent research by Vohs et al. (2013) garnered media attention after reporting that disordered environments increase creativity. The present research was designed to conceptually replicate and extend this finding by exploring the effect of workspace disorder on creativity. Participants were randomly assigned to work at a neatly organized (Order condition) or a messy desk (Disorder condition), where they completed several paper-and-pencil and computerized tasks, including two validated creativity measures (Abbreviated Torrance Test for Adults; ATTA; Goff and Torrance, 2002; Alternative Uses Task; adapted from Guilford, 1967). We also included several executive control measures from the NIH EXAMINER (Kramer, 2011), to explore the role of reduced top-down control in explaining a possible creativity-disorder connection. Independent-samples -tests failed to replicate any significant difference in creativity between the Order and Disorder conditions. Furthermore, the conditions did not differentially affect executive control. Despite implementing an experimental setup similar to the one in Vohs et al. (2013), including a larger sample size, and adopting multiple measures of the constructs of interest, we did not find any effect of workspace clutter on cognitive performance. At this stage, the relationship between disorder and cognition seems elusive and does not warrant the claims it generated in the popular press.

摘要

沃斯等人(2013年)最近的研究报告称,无序的环境会提高创造力,这一研究引起了媒体的关注。本研究旨在通过探索工作空间无序对创造力的影响,从概念上重复并扩展这一发现。参与者被随机分配到一个整洁有序的(有序条件)或杂乱的桌子(无序条件)前工作,在那里他们完成了几项纸笔和计算机化任务,包括两项经过验证的创造力测量(成人托兰斯简版测验;ATTA;戈夫和托兰斯,2002年;替代用途任务;改编自吉尔福德,1967年)。我们还纳入了来自美国国立卫生研究院考官的几项执行控制测量(克莱默,2011年),以探讨自上而下控制的减少在解释可能的创造力与无序之间联系中的作用。独立样本t检验未能重复有序和无序条件之间在创造力上的任何显著差异。此外,这些条件对执行控制没有差异影响。尽管实施了与沃斯等人(2013年)类似的实验设置,包括更大的样本量,并采用了对感兴趣结构的多种测量方法,但我们没有发现工作空间杂乱对认知表现有任何影响。在这个阶段,无序与认知之间的关系似乎难以捉摸,也不值得大众媒体所宣称的那样。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6fc0/6340966/a285135fee49/fpsyg-09-02662-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验