• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于检测猪粪便中[未提及具体物种名称]的传统诊断技术与分子诊断技术的比较。

Comparison of Conventional and Molecular Diagnostic Techniques for Detection of sp. in Pig Faeces.

作者信息

Süli Tamás, Kozoderović Gordana, Potkonjak Aleksandar, Simin Stanislav, Simin Verica, Lalošević Vesna

机构信息

Dept. of Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia.

Prophyl Animal Health Ltd, Mohács, Hungary.

出版信息

Iran J Parasitol. 2018 Oct-Dec;13(4):594-601.

PMID:30697313
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6348225/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

is a common protist colonizing the gastrointestinal tract of humans and various animals. Pigs have been suggested to be a reservoir for human infections because of high prevalence of the parasite in these animals and the presence of zoonotic subtypes. Nevertheless, epidemiological data is often misinterpreted due to the lack of standard diagnostic procedures. This study aimed to compare the sensitivity of different diagnostic techniques in detection of sp. in pigs.

METHODS

Overall, 48 individual faecal samples were collected from pigs reared in an intensive farming system (Autonomous Province of Vojvodina, Serbia) and were tested by microscopic examination of direct wet mount, in vitro cultivation in modified Jones' medium and conventional PCR for rRNA gene.

RESULTS

Xenic in vitro cultivation in Jones' medium showed higher sensitivity than direct wet mount when we compared it with PCR. Namely, the estimated sensitivity of direct wet mount was 46.15%, while the sensitivity of in vitro cultivation was 84.62%.

CONCLUSION

Low sensitivity of conventional parasitological compared to molecular methods is proven. Thus, reports on prevalence that rely solely on microscopy of faecal samples (unprocessed or concentrated) are probably underestimating the true prevalence of the parasite.

摘要

背景

是一种常见的原生生物,寄生于人类和各种动物的胃肠道。由于这种寄生虫在猪等动物中的高流行率以及人畜共患亚型的存在,猪被认为是人类感染的一个储存宿主。然而,由于缺乏标准的诊断程序,流行病学数据常常被误解。本研究旨在比较不同诊断技术检测猪体内 种的敏感性。

方法

总体而言,从集约化养殖系统(塞尔维亚伏伊伏丁那自治省)饲养的猪中收集了48份个体粪便样本,并通过直接湿涂片显微镜检查、改良琼斯培养基体外培养和rRNA基因常规PCR进行检测。

结果

与PCR相比,琼斯培养基中的异源体外培养显示出比直接湿涂片更高的敏感性。具体而言,直接湿涂片的估计敏感性为46.15%,而体外培养的敏感性为84.62%。

结论

与分子方法相比,传统寄生虫学方法的敏感性较低得到了证实。因此,仅依靠粪便样本(未处理或浓缩)显微镜检查的流行率报告可能低估了寄生虫的真实流行率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae51/6348225/c563be80ea3a/IJPA-13-594-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae51/6348225/4cce694a3c03/IJPA-13-594-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae51/6348225/c563be80ea3a/IJPA-13-594-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae51/6348225/4cce694a3c03/IJPA-13-594-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae51/6348225/c563be80ea3a/IJPA-13-594-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of Conventional and Molecular Diagnostic Techniques for Detection of sp. in Pig Faeces.用于检测猪粪便中[未提及具体物种名称]的传统诊断技术与分子诊断技术的比较。
Iran J Parasitol. 2018 Oct-Dec;13(4):594-601.
2
Prevalence of Blastocystis sp. in Morocco: Comparative assessment of three diagnostic methods and characterization of parasite forms in Jones' culture medium.摩洛哥囊尾蚴感染的流行情况:三种诊断方法的比较评估和琼斯培养液中寄生虫形态的特征描述。
Parasite. 2023;30:64. doi: 10.1051/parasite/2023065. Epub 2023 Dec 20.
3
Comparison of diagnostic methods (wet mount, trichrome staining, formol-ether, PCR, and xenic in vitro culture) for the detection of Blastocystis in stool samples in Urmia educational hospitals, the Northwest of Iran.伊朗西北部乌尔米亚教育医院粪便样本中检测芽囊原虫的诊断方法(湿片法、三色染色法、甲醛-乙醚法、聚合酶链反应和体外共生培养法)比较
Ann Parasitol. 2021;67(4):795-803. doi: 10.17420/ap6704.398.
4
DISTRIBUTION AND FREQUENCY OF BLASTOCYSTIS SP. BY METHODS OF MICROSCOPY AND CULTIVATION IN FAECES OF RESIDENTS OF KHARKOV REGION.哈科夫地区居民粪便中使用显微镜和培养方法检测 Blastocystis sp. 的分布和频率。
Georgian Med News. 2022 Jul-Aug(328-329):85-89.
5
Detection of in clinical stool specimens using three different methods and morphological examination in Jones' medium.使用三种不同方法检测临床粪便标本并在琼斯培养基中进行形态学检查。
Trop Parasitol. 2018 Jan-Jun;8(1):33-40. doi: 10.4103/tp.TP_4_18. Epub 2018 May 28.
6
Subtyping Blastocystis in pigs and humans revealed unusual avian-specific subtype ST6 in humans in Serbia.在塞尔维亚,对猪和人类中的类布氏锥虫进行亚分型揭示了人类中一种不常见的、具有禽类特异性的亚型 ST6。
Zoonoses Public Health. 2021 Aug;68(5):544-548. doi: 10.1111/zph.12829. Epub 2021 Apr 6.
7
Comparison of Various Diagnostic Techniques for the Detection of Spp. and its Molecular Characterisation in Farm Animals in the United Arab Emirates.阿联酋农场动物中Spp.检测的各种诊断技术比较及其分子特征分析
J Vet Res. 2023 Mar 28;67(1):93-98. doi: 10.2478/jvetres-2023-0017. eCollection 2023 Mar.
8
Detection and molecular identification of isolates from humans and cattle in northern Egypt.埃及北部人类和牛群分离株的检测与分子鉴定
J Parasit Dis. 2021 Sep;45(3):738-745. doi: 10.1007/s12639-021-01354-5. Epub 2021 Feb 5.
9
Laboratory diagnosis of Blastocystis spp. in diarrheic patients.腹泻患者中芽囊原虫属的实验室诊断
Trop Parasitol. 2015 Jan-Jun;5(1):36-41. doi: 10.4103/2229-5070.149919.
10
Blastocystis subtypes isolated from irritable bowel syndrome patients and co-infection with Helicobacter pylori.从肠易激综合征患者中分离出的芽囊原虫亚型及与幽门螺杆菌的共感染
Parasitol Res. 2018 Jan;117(1):127-137. doi: 10.1007/s00436-017-5679-4. Epub 2017 Nov 14.

引用本文的文献

1
First Report on the Occurrence and Subtypes of in Pigs in Poland Using Sequence-Tagged-Site PCR and Barcode Region Sequencing.利用序列标签位点聚合酶链反应和条形码区域测序对波兰猪群中[具体疾病或病原体,原文未明确]的发生情况和亚型的首次报告
Pathogens. 2020 Jul 21;9(7):595. doi: 10.3390/pathogens9070595.
2
Prevalence and subtype distribution of sp. infecting children from a rural community in Panama.巴拿马一个农村社区感染儿童的[具体物种名称未给出]的患病率及亚型分布情况。
Parasite Epidemiol Control. 2020 Jan 24;9:e00139. doi: 10.1016/j.parepi.2020.e00139. eCollection 2020 May.

本文引用的文献

1
Prevalence of Intestinal Parasitic Infections in Jiroft, Kerman Province, Iran.伊朗克尔曼省吉罗夫特地区肠道寄生虫感染的患病率
Iran J Parasitol. 2016 Apr-Jun;11(2):232-238.
2
Laboratory diagnosis of Blastocystis spp.芽囊原虫属的实验室诊断
Trop Parasitol. 2015 Jan-Jun;5(1):3-5. doi: 10.4103/2229-5070.149885.
3
Molecular epidemiology of Blastocystis in pigs and their in-contact humans in Southeast Queensland, Australia, and Cambodia.澳大利亚昆士兰州东南部和柬埔寨猪及其接触人群中芽囊原虫的分子流行病学研究。
Vet Parasitol. 2014 Jul 14;203(3-4):264-9. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2014.04.006. Epub 2014 Apr 18.
4
Molecular testing for clinical diagnosis and epidemiological investigations of intestinal parasitic infections.用于肠道寄生虫感染临床诊断和流行病学调查的分子检测
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2014 Apr;27(2):371-418. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00122-13.
5
Children of Senegal River Basin show the highest prevalence of Blastocystis sp. ever observed worldwide.塞内加尔河流域的儿童显示出全世界范围内观察到的最高的 Blastocystis sp. 流行率。
BMC Infect Dis. 2014 Mar 25;14:164. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-14-164.
6
Genetic diversity of blastocystis in livestock and zoo animals.家畜和动物园动物中囊胚期原虫的遗传多样性。
Protist. 2013 Jul;164(4):497-509. doi: 10.1016/j.protis.2013.05.003. Epub 2013 Jun 14.
7
Development and evaluation of a genus-specific, probe-based, internal-process-controlled real-time PCR assay for sensitive and specific detection of Blastocystis spp.建立并评价一种基于探针、种属特异性、内标实时 PCR 检测方法,用于敏感、特异地检测蓝氏贾第鞭毛虫。
J Clin Microbiol. 2012 Jun;50(6):1847-51. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00007-12. Epub 2012 Mar 14.
8
Levels of genetic diversity vary dramatically between Blastocystis subtypes.不同的芽囊原虫亚型之间遗传多样性水平差异显著。
Infect Genet Evol. 2012 Mar;12(2):263-73. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2011.11.002. Epub 2011 Nov 17.
9
Development and evaluation of a real-time PCR assay for detection and quantification of blastocystis parasites in human stool samples: prospective study of patients with hematological malignancies.建立和评估实时荧光定量 PCR 检测方法用于检测和定量人粪便样本中的芽囊原虫:血液恶性肿瘤患者的前瞻性研究。
J Clin Microbiol. 2011 Mar;49(3):975-83. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01392-10. Epub 2010 Dec 22.
10
Comparison of methods for detection of Blastocystis infection in routinely submitted stool samples, and also in IBS/IBD Patients in Ankara, Turkey.比较常规提交粪便样本中 Blastocystis 感染的检测方法,以及在土耳其安卡拉的 IBS/IBD 患者中的检测方法。
PLoS One. 2010 Nov 18;5(11):e15484. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0015484.