• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

种植体周围边缘骨丢失测量的数字协议比较。

Comparison of digital protocols for the measurement of peri-implant marginal bone loss.

作者信息

Peñarrocha-Oltra David, Palau Ivan, Cabanes Guillermo, Tarazona Beatriz, Peñarrocha-Diago Maria

机构信息

DDS, PhD. Assistant Professor of Oral Surgery and Implantology. University of Valencia Medical and Dental School.

DDS. University of Valencia Medical and Dental School.

出版信息

J Clin Exp Dent. 2018 Dec 1;10(12):e1216-e1222. doi: 10.4317/jced.55396. eCollection 2018 Dec.

DOI:10.4317/jced.55396
PMID:30697381
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6343979/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The measurement of peri-implant marginal bone loss is currently carried out using digital methods of radiographic analysis assisted by various types of software. The purpose of this study was to compare the characteristics of three different softwares: specific radiology software for the development and visualization of radiological images in DICOM format (3Dicom Viewer®), advanced level software for professional editing of bitmap images (or raster graphics) (Adobe Photoshop®), and mid-level software for processing bitmap-type images, programmed in Java and in the public domain (ImageJ®).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

It was verified that the three softwares used are valid for the measurement of peri-implant marginal bone loss provided that the appropriate protocol is fulfilled.

RESULTS

The results showed no significant differences between Adobe Photoshop® and ImageJ® with respect to 3Dicom Viewer® in the measurements of mesial and distal bone loss of the implants, without influence of the dental sector where they were located.

CONCLUSIONS

The measurements made with ImageJ® looked more like those of the control software (3Dicom Viewer®) than those of Adobe Photoshop®, but with a greater degree of dispersion. Thus, Adobe Photoshop® is a slightly inaccurate method but with less dispersion. Digital measurement, measurement software, peri-implant marginal bone loss, implants.

摘要

背景

目前，种植体周围边缘骨丢失的测量是通过各种软件辅助的数字放射分析方法进行的。本研究的目的是比较三种不同软件的特点：用于开发和可视化DICOM格式放射图像的特定放射学软件（3Dicom Viewer®）、用于专业编辑位图图像（或光栅图形）的高级软件（Adobe Photoshop®）以及用Java编写且属于公共领域的用于处理位图类型图像的中级软件（ImageJ®）。

材料与方法

经验证，只要满足适当的协议，所使用的这三种软件对于种植体周围边缘骨丢失的测量都是有效的。

结果

结果显示，在种植体近中及远中骨丢失的测量方面，Adobe Photoshop®和ImageJ®与3Dicom Viewer®之间没有显著差异，且不受它们所在牙区的影响。

结论

与Adobe Photoshop®相比，用ImageJ®进行的测量结果看起来更接近对照软件（3Dicom Viewer®）的测量结果，但离散度更大。因此，Adobe Photoshop®是一种略有不准确但离散度较小的方法。数字测量、测量软件、种植体周围边缘骨丢失、种植体。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4638/6343979/4dd6a6ee8354/jced-10-e1216-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4638/6343979/8b28a9abe191/jced-10-e1216-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4638/6343979/4147429d0244/jced-10-e1216-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4638/6343979/4dd6a6ee8354/jced-10-e1216-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4638/6343979/8b28a9abe191/jced-10-e1216-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4638/6343979/4147429d0244/jced-10-e1216-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4638/6343979/4dd6a6ee8354/jced-10-e1216-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of digital protocols for the measurement of peri-implant marginal bone loss.种植体周围边缘骨丢失测量的数字协议比较。
J Clin Exp Dent. 2018 Dec 1;10(12):e1216-e1222. doi: 10.4317/jced.55396. eCollection 2018 Dec.
2
Comparison of the Marginal Bone Loss in One-stage versus Two-stage Implant Surgery.一期与二期种植手术中边缘骨吸收的比较。
J Dent (Shiraz). 2017 Dec;18(4):272-276.
3
Influence of implant neck design and implant-abutment connection type on peri-implant health. Radiological study.种植体颈部设计及种植体-基台连接类型对种植体周围健康的影响。影像学研究。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013 Nov;24(11):1192-200. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02562.x. Epub 2012 Aug 28.
4
Clinical and Radiographic Assessment of Three-Implant-Supported Fixed-Prosthesis Rehabilitation of the Edentulous Mandible: Immediate Versus Delayed Loading.无牙下颌骨三种植体支持固定修复体的临床与影像学评估：即刻加载与延迟加载
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2018 May/June;33(3):653–660. doi: 10.11607/jomi.5870. Epub 2018 Mar 15.
5
OCTA: A Practical Method of Image Averaging Using Adobe Photoshop Software.光学相干断层扫描血管造影术：一种使用Adobe Photoshop软件进行图像平均处理的实用方法。
Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2019 Dec 1;50(12):802-807. doi: 10.3928/23258160-20191119-09.
6
Influence of surgical and prosthetic techniques on marginal bone loss around titanium implants. Part I: immediate loading in fresh extraction sockets.手术及修复技术对钛种植体周围边缘骨吸收的影响。第一部分：新鲜拔牙窝内的即刻负重
J Prosthodont. 2014 Oct;23(7):521-7. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12153. Epub 2014 Apr 18.
7
Comparison of grey scale median (GSM) measurement in ultrasound images of human carotid plaques using two different softwares.使用两种不同软件对人颈动脉斑块超声图像中的灰度中位数（GSM）测量进行比较。
Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2013 Nov;33(6):431-5. doi: 10.1111/cpf.12049. Epub 2013 May 13.
8
Comparison of Marginal Bone Loss Around Axial and Tilted Implants: A Retrospective CBCT Analysis of Up to 24 Months.轴向种植体与倾斜种植体周围边缘骨吸收的比较：一项长达24个月的回顾性CBCT分析
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2019 Sep/Oct;39(5):675-684. doi: 10.11607/prd.4110.
9
Diagnostic accuracy of CBCT versus intraoral imaging for assessment of peri-implant bone defects.CBCT 与口内成像评估种植体周围骨缺损的诊断准确性。
BMC Med Imaging. 2021 Feb 10;21(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s12880-021-00557-9.
10
Comparison of simulated periodontal bone defect depth measured in digital radiographs in dedicated and non-dedicated software systems.在专用和非专用软件系统中，对数字X线片中模拟的牙周骨缺损深度进行比较。
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2006 Nov;35(6):422-5. doi: 10.1259/dmfr/61300663.

引用本文的文献

1
Multicentre Prospective Study Analysing Relevant Factors Related to Marginal Bone Loss: A Two-Year Evolution.多中心前瞻性研究分析与边缘骨丢失相关的相关因素：两年进展情况
Dent J (Basel). 2023 Jul 31;11(8):185. doi: 10.3390/dj11080185.
2
Clinical feasibility and benefits of a tapered, sand-blasted, and acid-etched surfaced tissue-level dental implant.一种锥形、喷砂和酸蚀表面的组织水平牙科种植体的临床可行性和益处。
Int J Implant Dent. 2020 Oct 6;6(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s40729-020-00234-6.
3
Influence of marginal bone loss on peri-implantitis: Systematic review of literature.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of the Marginal Bone Loss in One-stage versus Two-stage Implant Surgery.一期与二期种植手术中边缘骨吸收的比较。
J Dent (Shiraz). 2017 Dec;18(4):272-276.
2
A prospective, split-mouth study comparing tilted implants with angulated connection versus conventional implants with angulated abutment.一项前瞻性、分口研究比较了倾斜种植体与成角连接与常规种植体与成角基台的差异。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2017 Dec;19(6):989-996. doi: 10.1111/cid.12544. Epub 2017 Oct 16.
3
Clinical and radiographic evaluation of single tantalum dental implants: a prospective pilot clinical study.
边缘骨丢失对种植体周围炎的影响：文献系统综述
J Clin Exp Dent. 2019 Nov 1;11(11):e1045-e1071. doi: 10.4317/jced.56202. eCollection 2019 Nov.
单颗钽牙种植体的临床及影像学评估：一项前瞻性初步临床研究
Oral Implantol (Rome). 2017 Feb 14;9(Suppl 1/2016 to N 4/2016):38-44. doi: 10.11138/orl/2016.9.1S.038. eCollection 2016 Jan-Mar.
4
Assessment of Marginal Peri-implant Bone-Level Short-Length Implants Compared with Standard Implants Supporting Single Crowns in a Controlled Clinical Trial: 12-Month Follow-up.在一项对照临床试验中，对边缘种植体周骨水平短种植体与支持单冠的标准种植体进行评估：12个月随访
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2016 Nov/Dec;36(6):791-795. doi: 10.11607/prd.3026.
5
Peri-implant bone loss around platform-switched Morse taper connection implants: a prospective 60-month follow-up study.平台转换莫氏锥度连接种植体周围的种植体周围骨丢失：一项为期60个月的前瞻性随访研究。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016 Dec;45(12):1577-1585. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2016.09.009. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
6
Influence of the prosthetic arm length (palatal position) of zygomatic implants upon patient satisfaction.颧骨种植体的修复臂长度（腭部位置）对患者满意度的影响。
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2016 May 1;21(3):e380-4. doi: 10.4317/medoral.21033.
7
Effect of oral hygiene maintenance on HbA1c levels and peri-implant parameters around immediately-loaded dental implants placed in type-2 diabetic patients: 2 years follow-up.口腔卫生维护对2型糖尿病患者即刻负重牙种植体周围糖化血红蛋白水平和种植体周围参数的影响：2年随访
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016 Nov;27(11):1439-1443. doi: 10.1111/clr.12758. Epub 2016 Jan 12.
8
Marginal bone level changes and implant stability after loading are not influenced by baseline microstructural bone characteristics: 1-year follow-up.加载后边缘骨水平变化和种植体稳定性不受基线微观结构骨特征的影响：1年随访。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016 Oct;27(10):1212-1220. doi: 10.1111/clr.12728. Epub 2015 Dec 9.
9
Soft tissue and crestal bone changes around implants with platform-switched abutments placed nonsubmerged at subcrestal position: a 2-year clinical and radiographic evaluation.在非潜入式种植体平台转换基台位于牙槽嵴顶下方位置时，种植体周围软组织和牙槽嵴骨的变化：一项为期2年的临床和影像学评估
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2015 Nov-Dec;30(6):1369-77. doi: 10.11607/jomi.4017. Epub 2015 Oct 16.
10
Early peri-implant bone loss: a prospective cohort study.早期种植体周围骨丢失：一项前瞻性队列研究。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015 Sep;44(9):1138-45. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2015.04.002. Epub 2015 May 23.