Suppr超能文献

使用两种不同软件对人颈动脉斑块超声图像中的灰度中位数(GSM)测量进行比较。

Comparison of grey scale median (GSM) measurement in ultrasound images of human carotid plaques using two different softwares.

作者信息

Östling Gerd, Persson Margaretha, Hedblad Bo, Gonçalves Isabel

机构信息

Department of Clinical Sciences, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.

出版信息

Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2013 Nov;33(6):431-5. doi: 10.1111/cpf.12049. Epub 2013 May 13.

Abstract

Grey scale median (GSM) measured on ultrasound images of carotid plaques has been used for several years now in research to find the vulnerable plaque. Centres have used different software and also different methods for GSM measurement. This has resulted in a wide range of GSM values and cut-off values for the detection of the vulnerable plaque. The aim of this study was to compare the values obtained with two different softwares, using different standardization methods, for the measurement of GSM on ultrasound images of carotid human plaques. GSM was measured with Adobe Photoshop(®) and with Artery Measurement System (AMS) on duplex ultrasound images of 100 consecutive medium- to large-sized carotid plaques of the Beta-blocker Cholesterol-lowering Asymptomatic Plaque Study (BCAPS). The mean values of GSM were 35·2 ± 19·3 and 55·8 ± 22·5 for Adobe Photoshop(®) and AMS, respectively. Mean difference was 20·45 (95% CI: 19·17-21·73). Although the absolute values of GSM differed, the agreement between the two measurements was good, correlation coefficient 0·95. A chi-square test revealed a kappa value of 0·68 when studying quartiles of GSM. The intra-observer variability was 1·9% for AMS and 2·5% for Adobe Photoshop. The difference between softwares and standardization methods must be taken into consideration when comparing studies. To avoid these problems, researcher should come to a consensus regarding software and standardization method for GSM measurement on ultrasound images of plaque in the arteries.

摘要

多年来,在寻找易损斑块的研究中,一直使用在颈动脉斑块超声图像上测量的灰度中位数(GSM)。各中心使用了不同的软件以及不同的GSM测量方法。这导致了用于检测易损斑块的GSM值和临界值范围很广。本研究的目的是比较使用两种不同软件并采用不同标准化方法在人类颈动脉斑块超声图像上测量GSM所获得的值。在β受体阻滞剂降胆固醇无症状斑块研究(BCAPS)的100个连续的中大型颈动脉斑块的双功超声图像上,使用Adobe Photoshop(®)和动脉测量系统(AMS)测量GSM。Adobe Photoshop(®)和AMS测量的GSM平均值分别为35.2±19.3和55.8±22.5。平均差值为20.45(95%CI:19.17 - 21.73)。尽管GSM的绝对值不同,但两次测量之间的一致性良好,相关系数为0.95。在研究GSM四分位数时,卡方检验显示kappa值为0.68。观察者内变异性对于AMS为1.9%,对于Adobe Photoshop为2.5%。在比较研究时,必须考虑软件和标准化方法之间的差异。为避免这些问题,研究人员应就动脉斑块超声图像上GSM测量的软件和标准化方法达成共识。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验