Suppr超能文献

脓疱病和深脓疱病的治疗。硫康唑与咪康唑的比较。

Treatment of impetigo and ecthyma. A comparison of sulconazole with miconazole.

作者信息

Nolting S, Strauss W B

机构信息

Abteilung für Dermatomikrobiologie, Westf. Wilhelms University, Münster, West Germany.

出版信息

Int J Dermatol. 1988 Dec;27(10):716-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-4362.1988.tb01273.x.

Abstract

In a randomized, double-blind, parallel comparative study of 80 patients, impetigo and ecthyma were treated effectively by sulconazole nitrate 1% cream and miconazole nitrate 2% cream applied to lesions twice daily for 14 days. When treatment began, bacterial cultures from all pyodermal lesions yielded Group A beta-hemolytic streptococci or pathogenic staphylococci. Among the 32 sulconazole-treated impetigo patients, bacterial cultures from 26 (69%) were negative by treatment day 4, and those from all 32 (100%) were negative by treatment day 7; among the 34 miconazole-treated impetigo patients, cultures from 17 (50%) were negative by treatment day 4, cultures from 32 (94.1%) were negative by treatment day 7, and cultures from 29 (97%) were negative by treatment day 14. Each treatment promptly relieved the pyodermal signs (crusts, vesicles, pustules, bullae, and exudate). Both agents were considered to be safe and effective medications for treating impetigo and ecthyma.

摘要

在一项针对80例患者的随机、双盲、平行对照研究中,1%硝酸硫康唑乳膏和2%硝酸咪康唑乳膏每天两次涂抹于皮损处,持续14天,有效治疗了脓疱病和深脓疱病。治疗开始时,所有脓皮病皮损的细菌培养均检出A组β溶血性链球菌或致病性葡萄球菌。在32例接受硝酸硫康唑治疗的脓疱病患者中,到治疗第4天,26例(69%)的细菌培养结果为阴性,到治疗第7天,所有32例(100%)的培养结果均为阴性;在34例接受硝酸咪康唑治疗的脓疱病患者中,到治疗第4天,17例(50%)的培养结果为阴性,到治疗第7天,32例(94.1%)的培养结果为阴性,到治疗第14天,29例(97%)的培养结果为阴性。每种治疗方法都迅速缓解了脓皮病症状(结痂、水疱、脓疱、大疱和渗出物)。两种药物均被认为是治疗脓疱病和深脓疱病的安全有效药物。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验