Krefting Research Centre, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Division of Allergology and Respiratory Medicine, Department of Medicine, Showa University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Clin Exp Allergy. 2019 Apr;49(4):495-505. doi: 10.1111/cea.13355. Epub 2019 Feb 27.
There are paucity of data on sensitization to furry animal allergen components in adults. Furry animals are major sensitizers and contributors to asthma burden in northern Europe and North America.
To characterize sensitization patterns to furry animal allergen components in Swedish adults.
Based on the West Sweden Asthma Study, a random population (n = 1103) and an asthma sample (n = 769) were tested for allergen sensitization using Phadiatop . Those with IgE ≥ 0.35 kU /L were tested for cat (Fel d 1, 2, and 4), dog (Can f 1, 2, 3, and 5), and horse (Equ c 1) allergen component sensitization. We defined allergen component poly-sensitization patterns, identified data-driven sensitization clusters, described component sensitization overlaps, and assessed determinants of sensitization patterns.
The prevalence of allergen component sensitization ranged from 0.8% for Fel d 2 and Can f 3 to 8.9% for Fel d 1. The most common dog component was Can f 5 (3.6%); 2.1% were sensitized to Equ c 1. Those sensitized to Fel d 2 and Fel d 4 were commonly sensitized to Fel d 1. The most common dog component overlap was between Can f 1/Can f 2 and Can f 5. Mono-sensitization was 5.6%, double sensitization 1.5% and poly-sensitization 2.1%. Sensitization was always higher in the asthma than in the random sample. Three sensitization clusters were derived, namely non-sensitized (90% in random vs 66% in asthma sample); Fel d 1-driven sensitized (7% vs 19%); and multi-sensitized (3% vs 15%). Key determinants of sensitization were gender, age, raised on a farm, family history of allergy or asthma, smoking, and occupational exposure to dust or fumes.
CONCLUSIONS & CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Fel d 1 and Can f 5 are the most common cat and dog components sensitization in this adult Swedish population. Mono-sensitization is more common than poly-sensitization. This detailed characterization highlights the current distribution of furry animal allergen components in Swedish adults, and their impact on clinical outcomes of asthma will be further explored.
成人对毛绒动物过敏原成分过敏的相关数据较少。在北欧和北美,毛绒动物是主要的致敏原,也是哮喘负担的主要贡献者。
描述瑞典成人对毛绒动物过敏原成分的过敏模式。
基于瑞典西部哮喘研究,对随机人群(n=1103)和哮喘样本(n=769)进行了 Phadiatop 过敏原检测。对 IgE≥0.35 kU/L 的患者进行了猫(Fel d 1、2 和 4)、狗(Can f 1、2、3 和 5)和马(Equ c 1)过敏原成分过敏检测。我们定义了过敏原成分的多敏化模式,确定了基于数据的敏化聚类,描述了成分敏化重叠,并评估了敏化模式的决定因素。
过敏原成分敏化的患病率从 Fel d 2 和 Can f 3 的 0.8%到 Fel d 1 的 8.9%不等。最常见的狗成分是 Can f 5(3.6%);2.1%对 Equ c 1 过敏。对 Fel d 2 和 Fel d 4 过敏的患者通常对 Fel d 1 过敏。最常见的狗成分重叠是 Can f 1/Can f 2 和 Can f 5 之间。单敏化占 5.6%,双敏化占 1.5%,多敏化占 2.1%。在哮喘患者中,过敏的发生率始终高于随机样本。得出了三个敏化聚类,即非敏化(随机样本中为 90%,哮喘样本中为 66%);Fel d 1 驱动敏化(7%比哮喘样本中的 19%);和多敏化(3%比哮喘样本中的 15%)。敏化的关键决定因素是性别、年龄、在农场长大、过敏或哮喘家族史、吸烟以及职业性粉尘或烟雾暴露。
在该瑞典成人人群中,Fel d 1 和 Can f 5 是最常见的猫和狗过敏原成分。单敏化比多敏化更常见。这一详细的特征描述突出了当前瑞典成人中毛绒动物过敏原成分的分布情况,并且将进一步探讨其对哮喘临床结局的影响。