• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

我们一视同仁:儿童福利中的种族公平。

We Treat Everybody the Same: Race Equity in Child Welfare.

机构信息

a Howard University School of Social Work.

出版信息

Soc Work Public Health. 2019;34(1):75-85. doi: 10.1080/19371918.2018.1562400. Epub 2019 Jan 30.

DOI:10.1080/19371918.2018.1562400
PMID:30698078
Abstract

For several decades, child welfare researchers have explored the issue of disproportionality in child welfare. Top-level government reports have confirmed that African-American children are disproportionately represented in the child welfare system. This knowledge led to the concern that equity standards are not being implemented in child welfare systems partially due to implicit bias and insufficient data to track services to this population of children. The lack of data and recognition of the disparate entry of African Americans into care will continue unless systems move to having the child welfare system understand overrepresentation and the need for equity in the provision of services. This article shares findings of a research study and is focused on the use of data as a strategy to improve racial equity in child welfare. It uses critical race theory (CRT) to explain how racism can impact equity in the provision of child welfare services.

摘要

几十年来,儿童福利研究人员一直在探讨儿童福利领域的不成比例问题。高层政府报告证实,非裔美国儿童在儿童福利系统中所占比例过高。这一认识引发了人们的担忧,即由于隐性偏见和缺乏足够的数据来跟踪向这部分儿童提供的服务,儿童福利系统并未实施公平标准。除非系统采取措施,让儿童福利系统了解服务提供方面的过度代表和公平性的必要性,否则非裔美国人进入护理系统的这种差异将继续存在。本文分享了一项研究的发现,重点是将数据用作提高儿童福利服务公平性的策略。它使用批判种族理论 (CRT) 来解释种族主义如何影响儿童福利服务提供的公平性。

相似文献

1
We Treat Everybody the Same: Race Equity in Child Welfare.我们一视同仁:儿童福利中的种族公平。
Soc Work Public Health. 2019;34(1):75-85. doi: 10.1080/19371918.2018.1562400. Epub 2019 Jan 30.
2
African American perspectives on racial disparities in child removals.非裔美国人对儿童转移中存在种族差异的看法。
Child Abuse Negl. 2019 Apr;90:139-148. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2018.12.023. Epub 2019 Feb 16.
3
Emerging strategies for reducing racial disproportionality and disparate outcomes in child welfare: the results of a national breakthrough series collaborative.减少儿童福利中种族不均衡和差异结果的新策略:一项全国性突破系列合作的成果
Child Welfare. 2008;87(2):211-40.
4
Implementation of differential response: a racial equity analysis.差异反应的实施:种族公平分析
Child Abuse Negl. 2015 Jan;39:73-85. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2014.04.013. Epub 2014 Jun 2.
5
Evaluating multisystemic efforts to impact disproportionality through key decision points.通过关键决策点评估旨在影响不均衡现象的多系统努力。
Child Welfare. 2008;87(2):241-54.
6
Understanding the overrepresentation of Black children in Ontario's child welfare system: Perspectives from child welfare workers and community service providers.理解安大略省儿童福利系统中黑人群体儿童比例过高的现象:儿童福利工作者和社区服务提供者的观点。
Child Abuse Negl. 2022 Jan;123:105425. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2021.105425. Epub 2021 Dec 7.
7
Addressing disproportionality through undoing racism, leadership development, and community engagement.通过消除种族主义、领导力发展和社区参与来解决不均衡问题。
Child Welfare. 2008;87(2):279-96.
8
Comparative analysis of two community-based efforts designed to impact disproportionality.旨在影响不均衡现象的两项基于社区的工作的比较分析
Child Welfare. 2008;87(2):297-317.
9
Racial disproportionality in child welfare. Introduction.儿童福利中的种族不均衡。引言。
Child Welfare. 2008;87(2):7-9.
10
Factors contributing to disproportionality in the child welfare system: views from the legal community.导致儿童福利系统中不成比例现象的因素:法律界的观点。
Soc Work. 2010 Jul;55(3):213-24. doi: 10.1093/sw/55.3.213.

引用本文的文献

1
Transforming Well-Child Care to Meet the Needs of Families at the Intersection of Racism and Poverty.将儿童保健服务转变为满足种族主义和贫困交叉家庭的需求。
Acad Pediatr. 2021 Nov-Dec;21(8S):S102-S107. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2021.08.004.
2
High-level psychotropic polypharmacy: a retrospective comparison of children in foster care to their peers on Medicaid.高等级精神药物多药治疗:与医疗补助计划中寄养儿童的同龄人进行回顾性比较。
BMC Psychiatry. 2021 Jun 10;21(1):303. doi: 10.1186/s12888-021-03309-9.
3
Social vulnerabilities for substance use: Stressors, socially toxic environments, and discrimination and racism.
社会脆弱性与物质使用:压力源、社会毒害环境以及歧视和种族主义。
Neuropharmacology. 2021 May 1;188:108518. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2021.108518. Epub 2021 Mar 11.