• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于智能体的电气化社区地震恢复力评估模型

Agent-Based Recovery Model for Seismic Resilience Evaluation of Electrified Communities.

作者信息

Sun Li, Stojadinovic Bozidar, Sansavini Giovanni

机构信息

Chair of Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Institute of Structural Engineering, ETH Zurich, Switzerland.

Laboratory of Reliability and Risk Engineering, Institute of Energy Technology, ETH Zurich, Switzerland.

出版信息

Risk Anal. 2019 Jul;39(7):1597-1614. doi: 10.1111/risa.13277. Epub 2019 Jan 30.

DOI:10.1111/risa.13277
PMID:30699236
Abstract

In this article, an agent-based framework to quantify the seismic resilience of an electric power supply system (EPSS) and the community it serves is presented. Within the framework, the loss and restoration of the EPSS power generation and delivery capacity and of the power demand from the served community are used to assess the electric power deficit during the damage absorption and recovery processes. Damage to the components of the EPSS and of the community-built environment is evaluated using the seismic fragility functions. The restoration of the community electric power demand is evaluated using the seismic recovery functions. However, the postearthquake EPSS recovery process is modeled using an agent-based model with two agents, the EPSS Operator and the Community Administrator. The resilience of the EPSS-community system is quantified using direct, EPSS-related, societal, and community-related indicators. Parametric studies are carried out to quantify the influence of different seismic hazard scenarios, agent characteristics, and power dispatch strategies on the EPSS-community seismic resilience. The use of the agent-based modeling framework enabled a rational formulation of the postearthquake recovery phase and highlighted the interaction between the EPSS and the community in the recovery process not quantified in resilience models developed to date. Furthermore, it shows that the resilience of different community sectors can be enhanced by different power dispatch strategies. The proposed agent-based EPSS-community system resilience quantification framework can be used to develop better community and infrastructure system risk governance policies.

摘要

本文提出了一种基于智能体的框架,用于量化电力供应系统(EPSS)及其所服务社区的地震恢复力。在该框架内,利用EPSS发电和供电能力的损失与恢复以及所服务社区的电力需求,来评估灾害吸收和恢复过程中的电力短缺情况。使用地震易损性函数评估EPSS组件和社区建筑环境的损坏情况。使用地震恢复函数评估社区电力需求的恢复情况。然而,震后EPSS恢复过程是使用一个基于智能体的模型进行建模的,该模型有两个智能体,即EPSS运营商和社区管理员。使用直接的、与EPSS相关的、社会的和与社区相关的指标来量化EPSS-社区系统的恢复力。进行参数研究以量化不同地震灾害情景、智能体特征和电力调度策略对EPSS-社区地震恢复力的影响。基于智能体的建模框架的使用使得震后恢复阶段能够得到合理的表述,并突出了EPSS与社区在恢复过程中的相互作用,而这种相互作用在迄今为止开发的恢复力模型中并未得到量化。此外,研究表明,不同的电力调度策略可以增强不同社区部门的恢复力。所提出的基于智能体的EPSS-社区系统恢复力量化框架可用于制定更好的社区和基础设施系统风险治理政策。

相似文献

1
Agent-Based Recovery Model for Seismic Resilience Evaluation of Electrified Communities.基于智能体的电气化社区地震恢复力评估模型
Risk Anal. 2019 Jul;39(7):1597-1614. doi: 10.1111/risa.13277. Epub 2019 Jan 30.
2
Mexico City during and after the September 19, 2017 earthquake: Assessment of seismic resilience and ongoing recovery process.2017年9月19日地震期间及之后的墨西哥城:地震恢复力评估与持续恢复进程
J Civ Struct Health Monit. 2021;11(5):1275-1299. doi: 10.1007/s13349-021-00511-x. Epub 2021 Aug 3.
3
Development of seismic resilience index methodology for RC structures via functionality curve.基于功能曲线的钢筋混凝土结构抗震恢复力指数方法的开发。
MethodsX. 2022 Sep 22;9:101865. doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2022.101865. eCollection 2022.
4
Modeling the resilience of critical infrastructure: the role of network dependencies.关键基础设施恢复力建模:网络依赖性的作用。
Sustain Resilient Infrastruct. 2016;1(3-4):153-168. doi: 10.1080/23789689.2016.1254999. Epub 2016 Dec 22.
5
Stormwater Infrastructure Resilience Assessment against Seismic Hazard Using Bayesian Belief Network.基于贝叶斯信念网络的抵御地震灾害的雨水基础设施弹性评估
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Aug 17;20(16):6593. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20166593.
6
Seismic Resilience of Rural Water Supply Systems; Factor Analysis of Cases Set in Sichuan Province, China.农村供水系统的抗震韧性;以中国四川省为例的案例因素分析。
Front Public Health. 2022 Feb 22;10:840379. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.840379. eCollection 2022.
7
Do topological models contribute to decision making on post-disaster electric power system restoration?拓扑模型对灾后电力系统恢复的决策有帮助吗?
Chaos. 2014 Dec;24(4):043131. doi: 10.1063/1.4898731.
8
A three-staged framework for measuring water supply resilience in rural China based on PLS-SEM.基于偏最小二乘法结构方程模型的中国农村供水弹性的三阶段衡量框架
Sci Rep. 2022 Mar 12;12(1):4323. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-08112-4.
9
Resilience assessment framework for critical infrastructure in a multi-hazard environment: Case study on transport assets.多灾害环境下关键基础设施的韧性评估框架:以交通资产为例。
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Apr 20;714:136854. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136854. Epub 2020 Jan 22.
10
Review of Seismic Risk Mitigation Policies in Earthquake-Prone Countries: Lessons for Earthquake Resilience in the United States.地震多发国家地震风险缓解政策综述:美国提升地震韧性的经验教训
J Earthq Eng. 2022;26(12). doi: 10.1080/13632469.2021.1911889.

引用本文的文献

1
Artificial intelligence-informed planning for the rapid response of hazard-impacted road networks.人工智能辅助的灾害影响道路网络快速响应规划。
Sci Rep. 2022 Sep 29;12(1):16286. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-19637-z.
2
Analyzing Healthcare Facility Resilience: Scientometric Review and Knowledge Map.分析医疗保健设施弹性:科学计量学回顾与知识图谱。
Front Public Health. 2021 Nov 8;9:764069. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.764069. eCollection 2021.