Tran Hieu Sy, You Ming Pei, Khan Tanveer N, Barbetti Martin J
School of Plant Biology and UWA Institute of Agriculture, Faculty of Science, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia.
The UWA Institute of Agriculture, Faculty of Science, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia.
Plant Dis. 2015 May;99(5):580-587. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-06-14-0655-RE. Epub 2015 Apr 30.
Black spot, also known as Ascochyta blight, is the most important disease on field pea (Pisum sativum). It is caused by a complex of pathogens, the most important of which in Australia include Didymella pinodes, Phoma pinodella, and P. koolunga. The relative proportions of these and other component pathogens of the complex fluctuate widely across time and geographic locations in Australia, limiting the ability of breeders to develop varieties with effective resistance to black spot. To address this, 40 field pea genotypes were tested under controlled environment conditions for their individual stem and leaf responses against these three pathogens. Disease severity was calculated as area under disease progress curve (AUDPC), and subsequently converted to mean rank (MR). The overall rank (OR) for each pathogen was used to compare response of genotypes under inoculation with each pathogen. The expressions of host resistance across the field pea genotypes were largely dependent upon the individual test pathogen and whether the test was on stem or leaf. Overall, P. koolunga caused most severe stem disease; significantly more severe than either D. pinodes or P. pinodella. This is the first report of the host resistance identified in field pea to P. koolunga; the five genotypes showing highest resistance on stem, viz. 05P778-BSR-701, ATC 5338, ATC 5345, Dundale, and ATC 866, had AUDPC MR values <250.4, while the AUDPC MR values of the 19 genotypes showing the best resistance on leaf was less than 296.8. Two genotypes, ATC 866 and Dundale, showed resistance against P. koolunga on both stem and leaf. Against D. pinodes, the four and 16 most resistant genotypes on stem and leaf had AUDPC MR values <111.2 and <136.6, respectively, with four genotypes showing resistance on both stem and leaf including 05P770-BSR-705, Austrian Winter Pea, 06P822-(F5)-BSR-6, and 98107-62E. Against P. pinodella, four and eight genotypes showing the best resistance on stem and leaf had AUDPC MR values <81.3 and <221.9, respectively; three genotypes, viz. 98107-62E, Dundale, and Austrian Winter Pea showed combined resistance on stem and leaf. A few genotypes identified with resistance against two major pathogens of the complex will be of particular significance to breeding programs. These findings explain why field pea varieties arising from breeding programs in Australia fail to display the level or consistency of resistance required against black spot and why there needs to be a wider focus than D. pinodes in breeding programs.
黑斑病,也称为豌豆壳二孢叶枯病,是豌豆(Pisum sativum)上最重要的病害。它由多种病原体引起,在澳大利亚最重要的病原体包括豌豆壳二孢(Didymella pinodes)、豌豆茎点霉(Phoma pinodella)和库伦加茎点霉(P. koolunga)。在澳大利亚,这些病原体以及该复合体中其他组成病原体的相对比例随时间和地理位置广泛波动,这限制了育种者培育对黑斑病具有有效抗性品种的能力。为了解决这个问题,在可控环境条件下对40个豌豆基因型进行了测试,以观察它们的茎和叶对这三种病原体的个体反应。病害严重程度通过病害进展曲线下面积(AUDPC)计算,随后转换为平均秩次(MR)。每种病原体的总体秩次(OR)用于比较各基因型在接种每种病原体后的反应。豌豆基因型间宿主抗性的表达在很大程度上取决于个体测试病原体以及测试是在茎上还是叶上。总体而言,库伦加茎点霉引起的茎部病害最严重;明显比豌豆壳二孢或豌豆茎点霉引起的病害更严重。这是首次报道在豌豆中鉴定出对库伦加茎点霉的宿主抗性;在茎上表现出最高抗性的五个基因型,即05P778 - BSR - 701、ATC 5338、ATC 5345、邓代尔(Dundale)和ATC 866,其AUDPC MR值<250.4,而在叶上表现出最佳抗性的19个基因型的AUDPC MR值小于296.8。两个基因型,ATC 866和邓代尔,在茎和叶上均表现出对库伦加茎点霉的抗性。对于豌豆壳二孢,在茎和叶上抗性最强的四个和十六个基因型的AUDPC MR值分别<111.2和<136.6,有四个基因型在茎和叶上均表现出抗性,包括05P770 - BSR - 705、奥地利冬豌豆、06P822 - (F5) - BSR - 6和98107 - 62E。对于豌豆茎点霉,在茎和叶上表现出最佳抗性的四个和八个基因型的AUDPC MR值分别<81.3和<221.9;三个基因型,即98107 - 62E、邓代尔和奥地利冬豌豆在茎和叶上均表现出抗性。鉴定出的对该复合体中两种主要病原体具有抗性的一些基因型对育种计划具有特别重要的意义。这些发现解释了为什么澳大利亚育种计划培育出的豌豆品种未能表现出对黑斑病所需的抗性水平或一致性,以及为什么育种计划需要比豌豆壳二孢更广泛地关注。