• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

考虑自信行为的群组决策方法及其在环境污染应急管理中的应用。

A Group Decision Making Approach Considering Self-confidence Behaviors and Its Application in Environmental Pollution Emergency Management.

机构信息

Business School, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100, China.

Andalusian Research Institute in Data Science and Computational Intelligence (DaSCI), University of Granada, 18071-Granada, Spain.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jan 29;16(3):385. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16030385.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph16030385
PMID:30700047
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6388219/
Abstract

Self-confidence as one of the human psychological behaviors has important influence on emergency management decision making, which has been ignored in existing methods. To fill this gap, we dedicate to design a group decision making approach considering self-confidence behaviors and apply it to the environmental pollution emergency management. In the proposed method, the self-confident fuzzy preference relations are utilized to express experts' evaluations. This new type of preference relations allow experts to express multiple self-confidence levels when providing their evaluations, which can deal with the self-confidence of them well. To apply the proposed group decision making method to environmental pollution emergency management, a novel determination of the decision weights of experts is given combining the subjective and objective weights. The subjective weight can be directly assigned by organizer, while the objective weight is determined by the self-confidence degree of experts on their evaluations. Afterwards, by utilizing the weighted averaging operator, the individuals' evaluations can be aggregated into a collective one. To do that, some operational laws for self-confident fuzzy preference relations are introduced. And then, a self-confidence score function is designed to get the best solution for environmental pollution emergency management. Finally, some analyses and discussions show that the proposed method is feasible and effective.

摘要

自信作为人类心理行为之一,对突发事件管理决策有重要影响,但现有方法往往忽略了这一点。为了填补这一空白,我们致力于设计一种考虑自信行为的群体决策方法,并将其应用于环境污染突发事件管理。在提出的方法中,利用自信模糊偏好关系来表示专家的评价。这种新型偏好关系允许专家在提供评价时表达多种自信水平,从而能够很好地处理他们的自信程度。为了将所提出的群体决策方法应用于环境污染突发事件管理,结合主观权重和客观权重,给出了一种新的专家决策权重的确定方法。主观权重可以由组织者直接分配,而客观权重则由专家对其评价的自信程度决定。然后,利用加权平均算子,将个体的评价汇总为一个整体。为此,引入了自信模糊偏好关系的一些运算规律。然后,设计了一个自信得分函数,以获得环境污染突发事件管理的最佳解决方案。最后,通过一些分析和讨论表明,所提出的方法是可行和有效的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d44d/6388219/f38fa379e8ca/ijerph-16-00385-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d44d/6388219/7b2b0a38940a/ijerph-16-00385-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d44d/6388219/f38fa379e8ca/ijerph-16-00385-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d44d/6388219/7b2b0a38940a/ijerph-16-00385-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d44d/6388219/f38fa379e8ca/ijerph-16-00385-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
A Group Decision Making Approach Considering Self-confidence Behaviors and Its Application in Environmental Pollution Emergency Management.考虑自信行为的群组决策方法及其在环境污染应急管理中的应用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jan 29;16(3):385. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16030385.
2
Effective allocation of resources in water pollution treatment alternatives: a multi-stage gray group decision-making method based on hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets.水污染处理方案的有效资源配置:基于犹豫模糊语言术语集的多阶段灰色群决策方法。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Jan;27(3):3173-3186. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-07265-6. Epub 2019 Dec 14.
3
TOPSIS-based consensus model for group decision-making with incomplete interval fuzzy preference relations.基于 TOPSIS 的群组决策共识模型,用于处理不完全区间模糊偏好关系。
IEEE Trans Cybern. 2014 Aug;44(8):1283-94. doi: 10.1109/TCYB.2013.2282037. Epub 2013 Sep 26.
4
Contingency response decision of network public opinion emergencies based on intuitionistic fuzzy entropy and preference information of decision makers.基于直觉模糊熵和决策者偏好信息的网络舆情突发事件应急响应决策。
Sci Rep. 2022 Feb 28;12(1):3246. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-07183-7.
5
Group decision-making model with incomplete fuzzy preference relations based on additive consistency.基于加法一致性的具有不完全模糊偏好关系的群体决策模型
IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B Cybern. 2007 Feb;37(1):176-89. doi: 10.1109/tsmcb.2006.875872.
6
A Linguistic Hierarchy Model with Self-Confidence Preference Relations and Its Application in Co-Regulation of Food Safety in China.具有自信偏好关系的语言层次模型及其在中国食品安全共同监管中的应用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Aug 14;16(16):2918. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16162918.
7
Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Preference Utility Set and Its Application in Selection of Fire Rescue Plans.犹豫模糊语言偏好效用集及其在消防救援方案选择中的应用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Apr 3;15(4):664. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15040664.
8
Fermatean fuzzy ELECTRE multi-criteria group decision-making and most suitable biomedical material selection.停止模糊 ELECTRE 多准则群决策和最适合生物医学材料选择。
Artif Intell Med. 2022 May;127:102278. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2022.102278. Epub 2022 Mar 18.
9
Nature Disaster Risk Evaluation with a Group Decision Making Method Based on Incomplete Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Preference Relations.基于不完全犹豫模糊语言偏好关系的群决策方法的自然灾害风险评估。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Apr 13;15(4):751. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15040751.
10
Multiple Group Decision Making for Selecting Emergency Alternatives: A Novel Method Based on the LDWPA Operator and LD-MABAC.基于 LDWPA 算子和 LD-MABAC 的多群组决策选择应急方案:一种新方法
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Apr 24;17(8):2945. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17082945.

引用本文的文献

1
Interactive multi-criteria group decision-making with probabilistic linguistic information for emergency assistance of COVID-19.基于概率语言信息的交互式多准则群体决策方法用于COVID-19紧急援助
Appl Soft Comput. 2021 Aug;107:107383. doi: 10.1016/j.asoc.2021.107383. Epub 2021 Apr 15.
2
Evaluation of the quality of COVID-19 prevention and control by a novel comprehensive evaluation model in a tertiary general hospital: a prospective observational study.运用一种新型综合评价模型评价某三甲综合医院新冠肺炎防控质量:一项前瞻性观察研究。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Nov 6;21(1):2022. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-12032-9.
3
Multiple Group Decision Making for Selecting Emergency Alternatives: A Novel Method Based on the LDWPA Operator and LD-MABAC.

本文引用的文献

1
Environmental incidents in China: Lessons from 2006 to 2015.中国环境事件:2006 年至 2015 年的教训。
Sci Total Environ. 2018 Aug 15;633:1165-1172. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.271. Epub 2018 Mar 30.
2
Nature Disaster Risk Evaluation with a Group Decision Making Method Based on Incomplete Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Preference Relations.基于不完全犹豫模糊语言偏好关系的群决策方法的自然灾害风险评估。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Apr 13;15(4):751. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15040751.
3
Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Preference Utility Set and Its Application in Selection of Fire Rescue Plans.
基于 LDWPA 算子和 LD-MABAC 的多群组决策选择应急方案:一种新方法
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Apr 24;17(8):2945. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17082945.
4
Spatial-Temporal Effects of PM on Health Burden: Evidence from China.PM 对健康负担的时空效应:来自中国的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Nov 25;16(23):4695. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16234695.
5
A Linguistic Hierarchy Model with Self-Confidence Preference Relations and Its Application in Co-Regulation of Food Safety in China.具有自信偏好关系的语言层次模型及其在中国食品安全共同监管中的应用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Aug 14;16(16):2918. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16162918.
6
An Optimization-Based Approach to Social Network Group Decision Making with an Application to Earthquake Shelter-Site Selection.基于优化的社会网络群体决策方法及其在地震避难所选址中的应用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jul 31;16(15):2740. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16152740.
犹豫模糊语言偏好效用集及其在消防救援方案选择中的应用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Apr 3;15(4):664. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15040664.
4
Resilience and sustainability: Similarities and differences in environmental management applications.韧性和可持续性:环境管理应用中的异同。
Sci Total Environ. 2018 Feb 1;613-614:1275-1283. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.09.086. Epub 2017 Sep 26.
5
Environmental risk assessment of pesticides in the River Madre de Dios, Costa Rica using PERPEST, SSD, and msPAF models.使用 PERPEST、SSD 和 msPAF 模型对哥斯达黎加马德雷河的农药进行环境风险评估。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2018 May;25(14):13254-13269. doi: 10.1007/s11356-016-7375-9. Epub 2016 Sep 12.
6
The latent causal chain of industrial water pollution in China.中国工业水污染的潜在因果链。
Environ Pollut. 2015 Jan;196:473-7. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2014.11.010.
7
Trust and compactness in social network groups.社交网络群体中的信任与紧密性。
IEEE Trans Cybern. 2015 Feb;45(2):205-16. doi: 10.1109/TCYB.2014.2323892. Epub 2014 Jul 31.
8
Consistency-driven automatic methodology to set interval numerical scales of 2-tuple linguistic term sets and its use in the linguistic GDM with preference relation.基于一致性的 2-元语言术语集区间数标度自动设定方法及其在具有偏好关系的语言 GDM 中的应用。
IEEE Trans Cybern. 2015 Apr;45(4):780-92. doi: 10.1109/TCYB.2014.2336808. Epub 2014 Jul 22.
9
Integrated environmental risk assessment and whole-process management system in chemical industry parks.工业园区的综合环境风险评估和全过程管理系统。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2013 Apr 19;10(4):1609-30. doi: 10.3390/ijerph10041609.
10
The 2007 water crisis in Wuxi, China: analysis of the origin.中国无锡 2007 年水危机:起因分析。
J Hazard Mater. 2010 Oct 15;182(1-3):130-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.06.006. Epub 2010 Jun 8.