Suppr超能文献

德国带状疱疹发病率 - 基于人群的德国国家队列研究中,来自于预试验的自我报告疾病数据的间接验证研究。

Herpes zoster incidence in Germany - an indirect validation study for self-reported disease data from pretest studies of the population-based German National Cohort.

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology, Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research, Inhoffenstraße 7, 38124, Braunschweig, Germany.

Institute for Medical Epidemiology, Biometry, and Informatics (IMEBI), Medical Faculty of the Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Magdeburger Str. 8, 06110, Halle (Saale), Germany.

出版信息

BMC Infect Dis. 2019 Jan 30;19(1):99. doi: 10.1186/s12879-019-3691-2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Until now, herpes zoster (HZ)-related disease burden in Germany has been estimated based on health insurance data and clinical findings. However, the validity of self-reported HZ is unclear. This study investigated the validity of self-reported herpes zoster (HZ) and its complication postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) using data from the pretest studies of the German National Cohort (GNC) in comparison with estimates based on health insurance data.

METHODS

Data of 4751 participants aged between 20 and 69 years from two pretest studies of the GNC carried out in 2011 and 2012 were used. Based on self-reports of physician-diagnosed HZ and PHN, age- and sex-specific HZ incidence rates and PHN proportions were estimated. For comparison, estimates based on statutory health insurance data from the German population were considered.

RESULTS

Eleven percent (95%-CI, 10.4 to 12.3, n = 539) of the participants reported at least one HZ episode in their lifetime. Our estimated age-specific HZ incidence rates were lower than previous estimates based on statutory health insurance data. The PHN proportion in participants older than 50 years was 5.9% (1.9 to 13.9%), which was in line with estimates based on health insurance data.

CONCLUSION

As age- and sex-specific patterns were comparable with that in health insurance data, self-reported diagnosis of HZ seems to be a valid instrument for overall disease trends. Possible reasons for observed differences in incidence rates are recall bias in self-reported data or overestimation in health insurance data.

摘要

背景

到目前为止,德国的带状疱疹(HZ)相关疾病负担一直是根据医疗保险数据和临床发现来估计的。然而,自我报告的 HZ 的有效性尚不清楚。本研究使用德国国家队列(GNC)的预测试研究数据,与基于医疗保险数据的估计值相比,调查了自我报告的带状疱疹(HZ)及其并发症疱疹后神经痛(PHN)的有效性。

方法

使用了 2011 年和 2012 年进行的 GNC 两项预测试研究中 4751 名年龄在 20 至 69 岁之间的参与者的数据。根据医生诊断的 HZ 和 PHN 的自我报告,估计了年龄和性别特异性的 HZ 发病率和 PHN 比例。为了进行比较,还考虑了基于德国人口的法定健康保险数据的估计值。

结果

11%(95%CI,10.4 至 12.3,n=539)的参与者报告在其一生中至少有一次 HZ 发作。我们估计的年龄特异性 HZ 发病率低于以前基于法定健康保险数据的估计值。50 岁以上参与者的 PHN 比例为 5.9%(1.9 至 13.9%),与基于医疗保险数据的估计值一致。

结论

由于年龄和性别特异性模式与医疗保险数据一致,自我报告的 HZ 诊断似乎是总体疾病趋势的有效工具。观察到的发病率差异的可能原因是自我报告数据中的回忆偏差或医疗保险数据中的高估。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab80/6354372/36972c031c13/12879_2019_3691_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验