Centre for Health and Social Care Research, Joint Faculty of Kingston University and St. George's University of London, London, UK.
Institute of Clinical Sciences, University of Birmingham, London, UK.
BMJ Open. 2019 Jan 30;9(1):e027012. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027012.
To investigate the deployment of physician associates (PAs); the factors supporting and inhibiting their employment and their contribution and impact on patients' experience and outcomes and the organisation of services.
Mixed methods within a case study design, using interviews, observations, work diaries and documentary analysis.
Six acute care hospitals in three regions of England in 2016-2017.
43 PAs, 77 other health professionals, 28 managers, 28 patients and relatives.
A key influencing factor supporting the employment of PAs in all settings was a shortage of doctors. PAs were found to be acceptable, appropriate and safe members of the medical/surgical teams by the majority of doctors, managers and nurses. They were mainly deployed to undertake inpatient ward work in the medical/surgical team during core weekday hours. They were reported to positively contribute to: continuity within their medical/surgical team, patient experience and flow, inducting new junior doctors, supporting the medical/surgical teams' workload, which released doctors for more complex patients and their training. The lack of regulation and attendant lack of authority to prescribe was seen as a problem in many but not all specialties. The contribution of PAs to productivity and patient outcomes was not quantifiable separately from other members of the team and wider service organisation. Patients and relatives described PAs positively but most did not understand who and what a PA was, often mistaking them for doctors.
This study offers new insights concerning the deployment and contribution of PAs in medical and surgical specialties in English hospitals. PAs provided a flexible addition to the secondary care workforce without drawing from existing professions. Their utility in the hospital setting is unlikely to be completely realised without the appropriate level of regulation and authority to prescribe medicines and order ionising radiation within their scope of practice.
调查医师助理(PAs)的部署情况;支持和抑制其就业的因素,以及他们对患者体验和结果以及服务组织的贡献和影响。
在案例研究设计中使用混合方法,采用访谈、观察、工作日志和文献分析。
2016-2017 年,英格兰三个地区的六家急症护理医院。
43 名医师助理、77 名其他卫生专业人员、28 名管理人员、28 名患者和亲属。
支持在所有环境中雇用 PAs 的一个关键影响因素是医生短缺。大多数医生、管理人员和护士都认为 PAs 是医疗/外科团队中可接受、合适和安全的成员。他们主要被部署在医疗/外科团队中,在核心工作日期间承担住院病房工作。据报道,他们对以下方面有积极贡献:其医疗/外科团队内部的连续性、患者体验和流程、新初级医生的入职、支持医疗/外科团队的工作量,从而释放医生处理更复杂的患者及其培训。在许多(但不是所有)专业中,缺乏监管和随之而来的缺乏处方权被视为一个问题。PAs 对生产力和患者结果的贡献无法与团队其他成员和更广泛的服务组织分开量化。患者和亲属对 PAs 的评价积极,但大多数人不了解 PAs 是谁以及他们是什么,经常将他们误认为是医生。
本研究提供了有关英语医院中医疗和外科专业中 PAs 的部署和贡献的新见解。PAs 在不依赖现有专业的情况下,为二级保健劳动力提供了灵活的补充。在没有适当的监管和授权在其执业范围内开具药物和开处放射性离子的情况下,他们在医院环境中的效用不太可能完全实现。