• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Evaluation of Orthodontic Patients at State and Foundation Universities According to the ICON Index.根据ICON指数对国立和基础大学正畸患者的评估。
Turk J Orthod. 2018 Dec;31(4):122-126. doi: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2018.18010. Epub 2018 Dec 1.
2
The relationship between the ICON index and the dental and aesthetic components of the IOTN index.ICON指数与IOTN指数的牙齿及美学组成部分之间的关系。
World J Orthod. 2010 Spring;11(1):43-8.
3
Orthodontic treatment complexity and need in a group of Nigerian patients: the relationship between the Dental Aesthetic Index (DAI) and the Index of Complexity, Outcome, and Need (ICON).一组尼日利亚患者的正畸治疗复杂性与需求：牙齿美学指数（DAI）与复杂性、结果及需求指数（ICON）之间的关系
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2007 Mar 1;8(3):37-44.
4
Validity of the Index of Complexity, Outcome, and Need (ICON) in determining orthodontic treatment need.复杂性、结果与需求指数（ICON）在确定正畸治疗需求方面的有效性。
Angle Orthod. 2002 Feb;72(1):15-20. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2002)072<0015:VOTIOC>2.0.CO;2.
5
Agreement between the index of complexity, outcome, and need and the dental and aesthetic components of the index of orthodontic treatment need.复杂性、结果和需求指数与正畸治疗需求指数的牙齿和美学成分之间的一致性。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011 Aug;140(2):233-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.09.028.
6
The reliability and validity of the Index of Complexity, Outcome and Need for determining treatment need in Dutch orthodontic practice.荷兰正畸实践中用于确定治疗需求的复杂性、结果和需求指数的可靠性和有效性。
Eur J Orthod. 2006 Feb;28(1):58-64. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cji085. Epub 2005 Nov 8.
7
An Analytical Study on an Orthodontic Index: Index of Complexity, Outcome and Need (ICON).一项关于正畸指数的分析研究：复杂性、结果与需求指数（ICON）
J Dent (Shiraz). 2015 Sep;16(3):149-55.
8
A Comparison of Three Orthodontic Treatment Indices with Regard to Angle Classification.三种正畸治疗指数在安氏分类方面的比较。
J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2016;40(2):169-74. doi: 10.17796/1053-4628-40.2.169.
9
Orthodontic treatment complexity and need in a Nigerian teaching hospital.
Oral Health Dent Manag. 2014 Sep;13(3):562-7.
10
Orthodontic Treatment Need and Complexity among 13-15 Year-Old Schoolchildren in Kerman, Iran.伊朗克尔曼13至15岁学童的正畸治疗需求与复杂性
J Dent (Shiraz). 2019 Jun;20(2):95-101. doi: 10.30476/DENTJODS.2019.44930.

引用本文的文献

1
Associations between oral health impacts attributed to malocclusion and normative and self-perceived orthodontic treatment need in Turkish adolescent patients.土耳其青少年患者中，错颌畸形所致口腔健康影响与正颌治疗需求的关联。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Oct 19;24(1):1253. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-05019-6.
2
Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Symptoms in A Group of Children Receiving Orthodontic Treatment in Turkey.土耳其一组接受正畸治疗儿童的注意力缺陷多动障碍症状
Turk J Orthod. 2020 Mar 1;33(1):31-36. doi: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2020.19020. eCollection 2020 Mar.

本文引用的文献

1
An Analytical Study on an Orthodontic Index: Index of Complexity, Outcome and Need (ICON).一项关于正畸指数的分析研究：复杂性、结果与需求指数（ICON）
J Dent (Shiraz). 2015 Sep;16(3):149-55.
2
Orthodontic treatment complexity and need in a Nigerian teaching hospital.
Oral Health Dent Manag. 2014 Sep;13(3):562-7.
3
An index of orthodontic treatment complexity.
Eur J Orthod. 2007 Apr;29(2):186-92. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjl080. Epub 2007 Jan 17.
4
Orthodontic treatment need in an accredited graduate orthodontic center in north america: a pilot study.北美一家经认可的研究生正畸中心的正畸治疗需求：一项试点研究。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2006 May 1;7(2):87-94.
5
Are the Peer Assessment Rating Index and the Index of Treatment Complexity, Outcome, and Need suitable measures for orthognathic outcomes?同行评估评级指数以及治疗复杂性、结果和需求指数是否适合用于正颌手术结果的评估？
Eur J Orthod. 2006 Oct;28(5):462-6. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cji120. Epub 2006 Apr 28.
6
Orthodontic treatment standards in a public group practice in Sweden.瑞典一家公共团体诊所的正畸治疗标准。
Swed Dent J. 2001;25(4):137-44.
7
Validity of the Index of Complexity, Outcome, and Need (ICON) in determining orthodontic treatment need.复杂性、结果与需求指数（ICON）在确定正畸治疗需求方面的有效性。
Angle Orthod. 2002 Feb;72(1):15-20. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2002)072<0015:VOTIOC>2.0.CO;2.
8
The development of the index of complexity, outcome and need (ICON).复杂性、结果与需求指数（ICON）的制定。
J Orthod. 2000 Jun;27(2):149-62. doi: 10.1093/ortho/27.2.149.
9
The development of an index of orthodontic treatment priority.正畸治疗优先级指数的制定。
Eur J Orthod. 1989 Aug;11(3):309-20. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.ejo.a035999.
10
The development of the PAR Index (Peer Assessment Rating): reliability and validity.同行评估评分（PAR Index）的开发：信度与效度
Eur J Orthod. 1992 Apr;14(2):125-39. doi: 10.1093/ejo/14.2.125.

根据ICON指数对国立和基础大学正畸患者的评估。

Evaluation of Orthodontic Patients at State and Foundation Universities According to the ICON Index.

作者信息

Öğütlü Nilüfer Yılmaz, Almahdi Ebrahim, Sayar Gülşilay, Kılıçoğlu Hülya

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics, İstanbul University School of Dentistry, İstanbul, Turkey.

Department of Orthodontics, Medipol University School of Dentistry, İstanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

Turk J Orthod. 2018 Dec;31(4):122-126. doi: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2018.18010. Epub 2018 Dec 1.

DOI:10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2018.18010
PMID:30701222
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6340495/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

In Turkey, orthodontic treatments of individuals aged <18 years are covered by the Social Security Institution (SSI) according to the Index of Complexity, Outcome, and Need (ICON) index at contracted healthcare providers. The aim of this study was to determine treatment needs and difficulties of patients applying to orthodontic clinics in state and foundation universities in Istanbul according to the ICON and to evaluate the extent of treatment coverage by the SSI.

METHODS

Pre-treatment study casts of 831 patients were evaluated in terms of treatment needs and difficulties according to the ICON. This sample was distributed as 677 patients who applied to a State University's Orthodontic Department and 154 who applied to a Foundation University's Orthodontic Department.

RESULTS

At the state university, 27.9% of the 437 patients had a score of <43 and were thus, described as "no treatment needed." At the foundation university, 35% of the 154 patients had a score <43 and were thus, described as "no treatment needed." When the ICON scores of the two universities were compared, no statistically significant difference was found between treatment needs distributions.

CONCLUSION

The number of patients who applied for treatment for the same period was three times higher in the state university than in the foundation university, whereas the rates of treatment needs were found to be similar between both state and foundation universities. At both universities, nearly one-third of patients were evaluated as "no treatment needed." The ICON index was found to be a reliable index in terms of reproducibility.

摘要

目的

在土耳其，18岁以下个体的正畸治疗由社会保障机构（SSI）根据签约医疗服务提供者处的复杂性、结果和需求指数（ICON）进行覆盖。本研究的目的是根据ICON确定申请伊斯坦布尔国立和基金会大学正畸诊所的患者的治疗需求和困难，并评估SSI的治疗覆盖范围。

方法

根据ICON对831例患者的治疗前研究模型进行治疗需求和困难评估。该样本分为677例申请国立大学正畸科的患者和154例申请基金会大学正畸科的患者。

结果

在国立大学，437例患者中有27.9%的患者得分<43，因此被描述为“无需治疗”。在基金会大学，154例患者中有35%的患者得分<43，因此被描述为“无需治疗”。比较两所大学的ICON评分，治疗需求分布之间未发现统计学上的显著差异。

结论

同期申请治疗的患者数量在国立大学比在基金会大学高三倍，而国立和基金会大学的治疗需求率相似。在两所大学，近三分之一的患者被评估为“无需治疗”。ICON指数在可重复性方面是一个可靠的指数。