• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

体重指数对肩关节镜术后并发症的影响:是否应根据体重指数切点来确定手术适应证?

The Impact of Body Mass Index on Complications After Shoulder Arthroscopy: Should Surgery Eligibility Be Determined by Body Mass Index Cutoffs?

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, California, U.S.A..

Department of Orthopedics, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, California, U.S.A.

出版信息

Arthroscopy. 2019 Mar;35(3):741-746. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2018.10.136. Epub 2019 Jan 29.

DOI:10.1016/j.arthro.2018.10.136
PMID:30704887
Abstract

PURPOSE

The goal of this study is to analyze postoperative complications after shoulder arthroscopy stratified by body mass index (BMI) and to quantify the trade-off in postsurgical complications and access to care that occurs with BMI eligibility cutoffs.

METHODS

Patients who underwent shoulder arthroscopy in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database from 2015 to 2016 were identified. Patients were categorized on the basis of their BMI. χ tests were used to identify differences in complication rates between different BMI categories. Logistic regression was used to calculate the odds ratio of having a major complication by BMI category. The positive predictive value (PPV) was calculated at different BMI cutoffs.

RESULTS

There were 26,509 shoulder arthroscopy cases identified in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database with 383 major complications, for an overall rate of 1.4%. Patients with a BMI >40 had a higher overall complication rate (2.3% vs 1.4%, P = .001), as well as higher rates of readmission (P = .012), pneumonia (P = .030), progressive renal insufficiency (P = .006), and cardiac arrest (P = .008). BMI >40 was associated with an increased risk of major complications (odds ratio, 1.84; confidence interval, 1.29-2.61). A BMI cutoff of 40 would avoid 12% of major complications while excluding 8% of complication-free surgeries. At a BMI cutoff of 40, the PPV was 2.3% where 43 surgeries would be denied for every complication avoided.

CONCLUSION

Patients with a BMI >40 have a statistically significant but only slightly increased risk of 30-day complications after shoulder arthroscopy. Instituting a BMI eligibility cutoff at 40 has a low PPV and would prevent 43 complication-free surgeries from proceeding for every complication prevented. Patients should be counseled individually about their risk factors, but denial of shoulder arthroscopy on the basis of BMI alone may not be an appropriate strategy for risk reduction.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, comparative prognostic trial.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在分析按体重指数(BMI)分层的肩关节镜术后并发症,并量化 BMI 合格标准切点所带来的术后并发症和获得治疗机会之间的权衡。

方法

从 2015 年至 2016 年,在国家手术质量改进计划数据库中确定接受肩关节镜手术的患者。根据 BMI 将患者分类。使用 χ2 检验比较不同 BMI 类别之间的并发症发生率差异。使用逻辑回归计算 BMI 类别下发生主要并发症的优势比。计算不同 BMI 截止值下的阳性预测值(PPV)。

结果

在国家手术质量改进计划数据库中,共确定了 26509 例肩关节镜手术病例,其中有 383 例出现严重并发症,总体发生率为 1.4%。BMI>40 的患者总体并发症发生率更高(2.3%比 1.4%,P=0.001),且再入院率(P=0.012)、肺炎(P=0.030)、进行性肾功能不全(P=0.006)和心脏骤停(P=0.008)的发生率更高。BMI>40 与发生主要并发症的风险增加相关(优势比,1.84;95%置信区间,1.29-2.61)。BMI 截止值为 40 可避免 12%的主要并发症,但会排除 8%无并发症的手术。在 BMI 截止值为 40 时,PPV 为 2.3%,即每避免一次并发症,就有 43 例手术被拒绝。

结论

BMI>40 的患者肩关节镜术后 30 天内出现并发症的风险虽有统计学意义,但仅略有增加。设定 BMI 合格标准为 40 会导致 PPV 较低,且每避免一次并发症,就会有 43 例无并发症的手术被拒绝。应根据患者的具体情况为其提供风险咨询,但仅凭 BMI 拒绝肩关节镜手术可能不是降低风险的合适策略。

证据等级

III 级,比较预后试验。

相似文献

1
The Impact of Body Mass Index on Complications After Shoulder Arthroscopy: Should Surgery Eligibility Be Determined by Body Mass Index Cutoffs?体重指数对肩关节镜术后并发症的影响:是否应根据体重指数切点来确定手术适应证?
Arthroscopy. 2019 Mar;35(3):741-746. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2018.10.136. Epub 2019 Jan 29.
2
Body Mass Index Screening in Knee Arthroscopy: An Analysis Using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Database.膝关节镜检查中的体重指数筛查:利用国家手术质量改进数据库进行的分析。
Arthroscopy. 2019 Dec;35(12):3289-3294. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2019.06.039.
3
The association of body mass index with same-day hospital admission, postoperative complications, and 30-day readmission following day-case eligible joint arthroscopy: A national registry analysis.体质量指数与当日住院、术后并发症及符合日间手术条件的关节镜检查后 30 天内再入院的关系:全国登记分析。
J Clin Anesth. 2020 Feb;59:26-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2019.06.012. Epub 2019 Jun 11.
4
Body Mass Index as a Risk Factor for 30-Day Postoperative Complications in Knee, Hip, and Shoulder Arthroscopy.体重指数作为膝关节、髋关节和肩关节关节镜术后 30 天内并发症的危险因素。
Arthroscopy. 2019 Mar;35(3):874-882.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2018.10.108. Epub 2019 Feb 4.
5
The Effects of Patient Obesity on Early Postoperative Complications After Shoulder Arthroscopy.患者肥胖对肩关节镜检查术后早期并发症的影响。
Arthroscopy. 2016 Nov;32(11):2212-2217.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2016.03.022. Epub 2016 May 18.
6
Shoulder Arthroscopy in Adults 60 or Older: Risk Factors That Correlate With Postoperative Complications in the First 30 Days.60岁及以上成年人的肩关节镜检查:与术后30天内并发症相关的危险因素
Arthroscopy. 2017 Jan;33(1):49-54. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2016.05.035. Epub 2016 Aug 3.
7
Risk Reduction Compared with Access to Care: Quantifying the Trade-Off of Enforcing a Body Mass Index Eligibility Criterion for Joint Replacement.与获得医疗服务相比,风险降低:量化实施关节置换 BMI 资格标准的权衡取舍。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018 Apr 4;100(7):539-545. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.17.00120.
8
Investigating a Potential Limit to Access to Care: Preoperative Cutoff Values for Body Mass Index for Shoulder Arthroplasty.探讨获得医疗服务的潜在限制:肩关节置换术前体质量指数的截止值。
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2022 Jan 1;30(1):e67-e73. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-21-00476.
9
The Obesity Paradox: A Nonlinear Relationship Between 30-Day Postoperative Complications and Body Mass Index After Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.肥胖悖论:全肩关节置换术后 30 天术后并发症与体重指数之间的非线性关系。
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2023 Nov 15;31(22):1165-1172. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-23-00122. Epub 2023 Sep 1.
10
Causes and Predictors of 30-Day Readmission After Shoulder and Knee Arthroscopy: An Analysis of 15,167 Cases.肩部和膝关节镜检查后30天再入院的原因及预测因素:15167例病例分析
Arthroscopy. 2015 Jun;31(6):1035-1040.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2015.03.029.

引用本文的文献

1
A retrospective cohort review of BMI on SI joint fusion outcomes: examining the evidence to improve insurance guidelines.关于身体质量指数对骶髂关节融合结果影响的回顾性队列研究:审视相关证据以完善保险指南。
Eur Spine J. 2025 Jan;34(1):140-147. doi: 10.1007/s00586-024-08475-4. Epub 2024 Aug 27.
2
Demographics and Outcomes of Glenohumeral Dislocations in Individuals With Elevated Body Mass Index.体质量指数增高患者的盂肱关节脱位的人口统计学和结果。
J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2024 Apr 9;8(4). doi: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-24-00021. eCollection 2024 Apr 1.
3
While the Incidence of Venous Thromboembolism After Shoulder Arthroscopy Is Low, the Risk Factors Are a Body Mass Index Greater than 30 and Hypertension.
虽然肩关节镜检查后静脉血栓栓塞的发生率较低,但危险因素是体重指数大于30和高血压。
Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2023 Dec 6;6(1):100815. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2023.100815. eCollection 2024 Feb.
4
Venothromboembolism following shoulder arthroscopy: a systematic review.肩关节镜检查后的静脉血栓栓塞:一项系统评价
JSES Rev Rep Tech. 2022 Jun 9;2(4):464-468. doi: 10.1016/j.xrrt.2022.05.003. eCollection 2022 Nov.
5
Venous thromboembolism after arthroscopic shoulder surgery: a systematic review.关节镜肩关节手术后的静脉血栓栓塞症:系统评价。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 Feb 14;18(1):103. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-03592-0.
6
The effects of obesity on 1-year functional outcomes after arthroscopic rotator cuff tear repair.肥胖对关节镜下肩袖撕裂修复术后1年功能预后的影响。
JSES Int. 2022 May 5;6(4):631-637. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2022.04.004. eCollection 2022 Jul.
7
Does anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction increase venous thromboembolism risk compared with knee meniscectomy under arthroscopy?与关节镜下膝关节半月板切除术相比,前交叉韧带重建会增加静脉血栓栓塞风险吗?
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Mar 18;23(1):268. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05216-w.
8
The Surgical Treatment of Proximal Humeral Fractures in Elderly Patients.老年肱骨近端骨折的手术治疗。
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2021 Dec 3;118(48):817-823. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.m2021.0326.