Separating the Wheat From the Chaff: Guidance From New Technologies for Detecting Deception in the Courtroom.
作者信息
Burgoon Judee K
机构信息
Center for the Management of Information, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States.
出版信息
Front Psychiatry. 2019 Jan 17;9:774. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00774. eCollection 2018.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Separating the Wheat From the Chaff: Guidance From New Technologies for Detecting Deception in the Courtroom.去伪存真：法庭上检测欺骗行为的新技术指南
Front Psychiatry. 2019 Jan 17;9:774. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00774. eCollection 2018.
2
Psychopathy and nonverbal indicators of deception in offenders.罪犯中的精神病态与欺骗的非言语指标
Law Hum Behav. 2007 Aug;31(4):337-51. doi: 10.1007/s10979-006-9063-7. Epub 2006 Oct 21.
3
Psychopathy and deception detection.精神变态与欺骗检测。
Personal Ment Health. 2013 May;7(2):154-9. doi: 10.1002/pmh.1215. Epub 2012 Sep 4.
4
The guilty brain: the utility of neuroimaging and neurostimulation studies in forensic field.有罪的大脑：神经影像学和神经刺激研究在法医领域的应用
Rev Neurosci. 2017 Feb 1;28(2):161-172. doi: 10.1515/revneuro-2016-0048.
5
Reading Lies: Nonverbal Communication and Deception.阅读谎言：非言语交际与欺骗。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2019 Jan 4;70:295-317. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-103135.
6
Automated decoding of facial expressions reveals marked differences in children when telling antisocial versus prosocial lies.面部表情的自动解码显示，儿童在讲述反社会谎言和亲社会谎言时存在显著差异。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2016 Oct;150:165-179. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2016.05.007. Epub 2016 Jun 16.
7
Children's use of a verbal-nonverbal consistency principle to infer truth and lying.儿童运用言语-非言语一致性原则来推断真假。
Child Dev. 1989 Apr;60(2):309-22.
8
The case for pain neuroimaging in the courtroom: lessons from deception detection.法庭上疼痛神经成像的案例：来自欺骗检测的经验教训。
J Law Biosci. 2015 Feb 4;2(1):139-148. doi: 10.1093/jlb/lsv003. eCollection 2015 Feb.
9
Lying words: predicting deception from linguistic styles.谎言：从语言风格预测欺骗行为。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2003 May;29(5):665-75. doi: 10.1177/0146167203029005010.
10
Is interactional dissynchrony a clue to deception? Insights from automated analysis of nonverbal visual cues.互动失同步是欺骗的线索吗？非言语视觉线索自动分析的见解。
IEEE Trans Cybern. 2015 Mar;45(3):506-20. doi: 10.1109/TCYB.2014.2329673. Epub 2014 Jun 27.
本文引用的文献
1
Microexpressions Are Not the Best Way to Catch a Liar.微表情并非识破谎言的最佳方式。
Front Psychol. 2018 Sep 20;9:1672. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01672. eCollection 2018.
2
Deception and Cognitive Load: Expanding Our Horizon with a Working Memory Model.欺骗与认知负荷：运用工作记忆模型拓展我们的视野
Front Psychol. 2016 Apr 7;7:420. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00420. eCollection 2016.
3
Deception detection with behavioral, autonomic, and neural measures: Conceptual and methodological considerations that warrant modesty.运用行为、自主神经和神经测量手段进行欺骗检测：需要保持谨慎的概念和方法学考量。
Psychophysiology. 2016 May;53(5):593-604. doi: 10.1111/psyp.12609. Epub 2016 Jan 20.
4
When is Deceptive Message Production More Effortful than Truth-Telling? A Baker's Dozen of Moderators.何时编造欺骗性信息比讲真话更费力？十三个调节因素。
Front Psychol. 2015 Dec 24;6:1965. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01965. eCollection 2015.
5
Are computers effective lie detectors? A meta-analysis of linguistic cues to deception.电脑能有效测谎吗？对欺骗的语言线索进行元分析。
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2015 Nov;19(4):307-42. doi: 10.1177/1088868314556539. Epub 2014 Nov 11.
6
Detecting concealed information using functional near-infrared spectroscopy.使用功能近红外光谱技术检测隐藏信息。
Brain Topogr. 2014 Sep;27(5):652-62. doi: 10.1007/s10548-014-0352-z. Epub 2014 Feb 11.
7
Using Brain Imaging for Lie Detection: Where Science, Law and Research Policy Collide.利用脑部成像进行测谎：科学、法律与研究政策的碰撞之处
Psychol Public Policy Law. 2013 May 1;19(2):222-234. doi: 10.1037/a0028841.
8
Cry me a river: identifying the behavioral consequences of extremely high-stakes interpersonal deception.痛哭流涕：识别高风险人际欺骗的行为后果。
Law Hum Behav. 2012 Dec;36(6):469-477. doi: 10.1037/h0093929. Epub 2011 Dec 19.
9
Deception detection from written accounts.从书面陈述中进行欺骗检测。
Scand J Psychol. 2012 Apr;53(2):103-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2011.00931.x. Epub 2011 Dec 19.
10
The contributions of prefrontal cortex and executive control to deception: evidence from activation likelihood estimate meta-analyses.前额叶皮层和执行控制对欺骗行为的作用：激活可能性估计元分析的证据
Cereb Cortex. 2009 Jul;19(7):1557-66. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhn189. Epub 2008 Nov 2.
Zotero 插件