文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

护理实践中触发安慰剂和反安慰剂效应的情境因素:一项全国性横断面研究的结果

Contextual factors triggering placebo and nocebo effects in nursing practice: Findings from a national cross-sectional study.

作者信息

Palese Alvisa, Cadorin Lucia, Testa Marco, Geri Tommaso, Colloca Luana, Rossettini Giacomo

机构信息

Department of Medical Sciences, School of Nursing, University of Udine, Udine, Italy.

Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO), IRCCS, Aviano, Italy.

出版信息

J Clin Nurs. 2019 May;28(9-10):1966-1978. doi: 10.1111/jocn.14809. Epub 2019 Feb 18.


DOI:10.1111/jocn.14809
PMID:30706543
Abstract

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To describe contextual factors (CFs) used by nurses to increase placebo and to prevent nocebo effects. BACKGROUND: Placebo effects have been studied in the nursing discipline, but nocebo effects still remain unexplored. Recently, a set of CFs functioning as triggers of placebo/nocebo effects has been described; however, its use in daily care has never been documented to date. DESIGN: A national cross-sectional survey, according to the Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys guidelines and STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE), was performed in 2016. METHODS: A wide sample of Italian nurses belonging to four national associations was involved. A questionnaire based on CFs literature was developed and administered through the SurveyMonkey Software exploring: (a) CFs definition, (b) beliefs, (c) case-by-case frequency of use, (d) circumstances of application, (e) clinical conditions where participants perceived their potential beneficial effects, (f) ethical implications and (g) communication issues with the patient. RESULTS: Out of 1,411 eligible nurses, 455 answered (32.2%) and 425 questionnaires (30.1%) were valid for the analysis. A total of 211 nurses (49.6%) defined the CFs as an intervention with a possible aspecific effect; participants believed in the CFs (2.91; 95%CI 2.88-2.94), using them >2 times/month, mainly in addition to a nursing intervention to optimise clinical outcomes (n = 79; 18.6%). Psychological and physiological therapeutic effects have been perceived mainly in chronic pain (n = 259; 60.9%) and insomnia (n = 243; 57.2%). According to participants, CFs have been reported as ethically acceptable when exerting beneficial psychological effects (n = 148; 34.8%); however, 103 (24.2%) of nurses did not communicate to the patient when CFs were used. CONCLUSIONS: Nurses are aware of CFs as elements to increase the placebo and prevent the nocebo effects in concomitance with evidence-based nursing interventions. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: The CFs valued by nurses and experienced as effective are mainly based upon the internal quality of the nurse and the quality of the relationship between the nurse and the patient. These qualities require a large personal investment; therefore, nurses should be supported in developing these qualities since their nursing graduation.

摘要

目的与目标:描述护士用于增强安慰剂效应和预防反安慰剂效应的情境因素(CFs)。 背景:护理领域已对安慰剂效应进行了研究,但反安慰剂效应仍未得到探索。最近,已描述了一组作为安慰剂/反安慰剂效应触发因素的CFs;然而,其在日常护理中的应用迄今尚未有文献记载。 设计:根据互联网电子调查结果报告清单指南和加强流行病学观察性研究报告(STROBE),于2016年开展了一项全国性横断面调查。 方法:纳入了来自四个全国性协会的大量意大利护士样本。基于CFs文献编制了一份问卷,并通过SurveyMonkey软件进行发放,该问卷探讨了:(a)CFs的定义,(b)信念,(c)逐案使用频率,(d)应用情况,(e)参与者认为其可能产生有益效果的临床状况,(f)伦理影响以及(g)与患者的沟通问题。 结果:在1411名符合条件的护士中,455人进行了回复(32.2%),425份问卷(30.1%)可用于分析。共有211名护士(49.6%)将CFs定义为一种可能具有非特异性效应的干预措施;参与者相信CFs(2.91;95%置信区间2.88 - 2.94),每月使用次数>2次,主要是在护理干预之外用于优化临床结局(n = 79;18.6%)。心理和生理治疗效果主要在慢性疼痛(n = 259;60.9%)和失眠(n = 243;57.2%)中被感知到。据参与者报告,当CFs产生有益的心理效应时,其在伦理上是可接受的(n = 148;34.8%);然而,103名(24.2%)护士在使用CFs时未与患者沟通。 结论:护士意识到CFs是在实施循证护理干预的同时增强安慰剂效应和预防反安慰剂效应的因素。 与临床实践的相关性:护士重视且认为有效的CFs主要基于护士的内在素质以及护士与患者之间关系的质量。这些素质需要大量的个人投入;因此,自护士毕业起就应支持他们培养这些素质。

相似文献

[1]
Contextual factors triggering placebo and nocebo effects in nursing practice: Findings from a national cross-sectional study.

J Clin Nurs. 2019-5

[2]
The awareness of contextual factors, placebo and nocebo effects among nursing students: Findings from a cross-sectional study.

Nurse Educ Pract. 2019-11-19

[3]
The Knowledge of Contextual Factors as Triggers of Placebo and Nocebo Effects in Patients With Musculoskeletal Pain: Findings From a National Survey.

Front Psychiatry. 2019-7-4

[4]
Clinical relevance of contextual factors as triggers of placebo and nocebo effects in musculoskeletal pain.

BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018-1-22

[5]
Physical therapists' perspectives on using contextual factors in clinical practice: Findings from an Italian national survey.

PLoS One. 2018-11-30

[6]
The impact of contextual factors on nursing outcomes and the role of placebo/nocebo effects: a discussion paper.

Pain Rep. 2019-6-7

[7]
What Physiotherapists Specialized in Orthopedic Manual Therapy Know About Nocebo-Related Effects and Contextual Factors: Findings From a National Survey.

Front Psychol. 2020-10-20

[8]
Beliefs and implementation of evidence-based practice among nurses in the nursing homes of a Swiss canton: An observational cross-sectional study.

J Clin Nurs. 2021-11

[9]
Nurses' attitudes, beliefs and practices on sexuality for cardiovascular care: A cross-sectional study.

J Clin Nurs. 2018-11-20

[10]
Understanding placebo effects: Implications for nursing practice.

Nurs Outlook. 2015

引用本文的文献

[1]
Talking placebo: a qualitative study of patients' attitudes toward open-label placebo implementation into clinical practice.

Front Psychol. 2025-7-31

[2]
Research hotspots and trends of acupoint and pain based on PubMed: a bibliometric analysis.

Front Neurol. 2025-1-17

[3]
Placebo and the law of identification.

Front Psychiatry. 2024-12-6

[4]
The association between perceived sensitivity to medicines, reported side effects and personal characteristics: A secondary analysis of an RCT.

PLoS One. 2024

[5]
Fire needle therapy for the treatment of cancer pain: a protocol for the systematic review and meta-analysis.

Front Neurol. 2024-9-15

[6]
"Trying to explain the unexplainable": why research on contextual factors in musculoskeletal pain is needed.

Pain Manag. 2024-9

[7]
Psychological, cognitive, and physiological impact of hazards casualties' trainings on first responders: the example of a chemical and radiological training. An exploratory study.

Front Psychol. 2024-1-30

[8]
Would You Take an Open-Label Placebo Pill or Give One to Your Child? Findings from a Cross-Sectional Survey.

Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2024-2-2

[9]
Are patients picking up what we are putting down? Considering nocebo effects in exercise for musculoskeletal pain.

Front Psychol. 2023-11-23

[10]
Using contextual factors to elicit placebo and nocebo effects: An online survey of healthcare providers' practice.

PLoS One. 2023

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索