Skorton Center for Health Initiatives, Cornell Health, Cornell University.
Health Commun. 2020 Apr;35(4):397-409. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2018.1564956. Epub 2019 Feb 1.
This study evaluates the impact of a theory- and empirical evidence- based 20-minute video, , on college students' intentions to intervene on behalf of others in multiple problematic situations: an alcohol emergency, emotional distress, hazing, intimate partner violence, racial bias, sexual assault, and sexual harassment. A randomized controlled trial of undergraduate and graduate students ( = 1,243) was conducted to determine the effectiveness of the video as an intervention for increasing students' self-reported likelihood to engage in pro-social bystander behavior across these various situations. Results showed that participants who viewed the video online reported higher likelihood at 4 weeks post-viewing to intervene in situations involving hazing, intimate partner violence, racial bias, and sexual harassment than did their control group counterparts. is the first video-based bystander education intervention shown to be effective, even 4 weeks after viewing, at increasing college students' self-reported likelihood to intervene in multiple problematic social situations. Providing access to this free online video represents a cost-effective prevention and communication strategy that can be employed by other colleges and universities.
这项研究评估了一个基于理论和实证证据的 20 分钟视频，即 ，对大学生代表他人干预多种问题情况的意图的影响：酒精紧急情况、情绪困扰、欺凌、亲密伴侣暴力、种族偏见、性侵犯和性骚扰。对本科和研究生（n=1243）进行了随机对照试验，以确定该视频作为增加学生自我报告在各种情况下参与亲社会旁观者行为的可能性的干预措施的有效性。结果表明，与对照组相比，在线观看视频的参与者在观看后 4 周报告说，他们更有可能干预涉及欺凌、亲密伴侣暴力、种族偏见和性骚扰的情况。 是第一个被证明有效的基于视频的旁观者教育干预措施，即使在观看后 4 周，也能提高大学生自我报告在多种有问题的社会情况下进行干预的可能性。提供对这个免费在线视频的访问代表了一种具有成本效益的预防和沟通策略，可以被其他学院和大学采用。
