• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

开发关于教师笔试问题的本地证据:亚洲非英语母语护理专业学生对语言修改的看法。

Developing Local Evidence About Faculty Written Exam Questions: Asian ESL Nursing Student Perceptions About Linguistic Modification.

作者信息

Mulready-Shick JoAnn, Edward Jean, Sitthisongkram Somporn

机构信息

About the Authors JoAnn Mulready-Shick, EdD, RN, CNE, ANEF, is a clinical professor, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, Massachusetts. Jean Edward, PhD, RN, CHPE, is an assistant professor at the College of Nursing and nurse scientist, University of Kentucky HealthCare Markey Cancer Center, Lexington, Kentucky. Somporn Sitthisongkram, MSN, RN, is a PhD candidate, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Boston. This evaluation study received funding from the university's Asian American Student Success Program, part of a US Department of Education Asian American Native American Pacific Islander Serving Institution grant. For more information, contact Dr. Mulready-Shick at

出版信息

Nurs Educ Perspect. 2020 Mar/Apr;41(2):109-111. doi: 10.1097/01.NEP.0000000000000465.

DOI:10.1097/01.NEP.0000000000000465
PMID:30707205
Abstract

Limited studies address perspectives about exam-writing practices of nursing students for whom English is an additional language. The authors conducted a program-level study of perceptions of 26 nursing students of Asian background who identified as nonnative speakers of English regarding faculty-made, multiple-choice exam questions that had been linguistically modified. Linguistic modification promoted readability and comprehensibility; students preferred the linguistically modified versions 60 percent of the time. This inquiry attends to the need for greater responsiveness to student concerns about test-taking practices and for engendering their ongoing participation in creating local evidence for improving program outcomes.

摘要

针对英语为附加语言的护理专业学生考试写作实践的观点的研究有限。作者对26名亚洲背景的护理专业学生进行了一项项目层面的研究,这些学生将自己认定为非英语母语者,研究内容是关于教师编写的、经过语言修改的多项选择题。语言修改提高了可读性和可理解性;学生60%的情况下更喜欢语言修改后的版本。这项调查关注了需要对学生对考试实践的担忧做出更大回应,并促使他们持续参与创造本地证据以改善项目成果。

相似文献

1
Developing Local Evidence About Faculty Written Exam Questions: Asian ESL Nursing Student Perceptions About Linguistic Modification.开发关于教师笔试问题的本地证据:亚洲非英语母语护理专业学生对语言修改的看法。
Nurs Educ Perspect. 2020 Mar/Apr;41(2):109-111. doi: 10.1097/01.NEP.0000000000000465.
2
The effects of linguistic modification on ESL students' comprehension of nursing course test items.语言修改对非英语母语学生理解护理课程测试题目的影响。
Nurs Educ Perspect. 2008 May-Jun;29(3):165-72.
3
The effect of linguistic modification on English as a second language (ESL) nursing student retention.语言修正对英语作为第二语言(ESL)护理专业学生保留率的影响。
Int J Nurs Educ Scholarsh. 2020 Jun 23;17(1):/j/ijnes.2020.17.issue-1/ijnes-2019-0116/ijnes-2019-0116.xml. doi: 10.1515/ijnes-2019-0116.
4
The Role of Linguistic Modification in Nursing Education.语言修饰在护理教育中的作用。
J Nurs Educ. 2016 Jun 1;55(6):309-15. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20160516-02.
5
The effects of clinical facilitators' pedagogic practices on learning opportunities for students who speak English as an additional language: An ethnographic study.临床促进者的教学实践对以英语为附加语言的学生学习机会的影响:一项民族志研究。
Nurse Educ Today. 2019 Mar;74:1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2018.12.004. Epub 2018 Dec 10.
6
Comparison of native versus nonnative English-speaking nurses on critical thinking assessments at entry and exit.以英语为母语和非英语为母语的护士在入职和离职时批判性思维评估的比较。
Nurs Adm Q. 2006 Jul-Sep;30(3):285-90. doi: 10.1097/00006216-200607000-00013.
7
Clinical expectations: what facilitators expect from ESL students on clinical placement.临床期望:ESL 学生在临床实习中期望得到的支持。
Nurse Educ Pract. 2012 Mar;12(2):115-9. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2011.10.008. Epub 2011 Nov 13.
8
Evidence-based instructional strategies: facilitating linguistically diverse nursing student learning.循证教学策略:促进语言多样化的护理学生学习。
Nurse Educ. 2013 May-Jun;38(3):118-21. doi: 10.1097/NNE.0b013e31828dc2c3.
9
A descriptive study of a clinical evaluation tool and process: student and faculty perspectives.一项临床评估工具和流程的描述性研究:学生和教师的观点。
J Nurs Educ. 2014 Mar;53(3):S30-3. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20140211-02. Epub 2014 Feb 11.
10
English-as-a-second language (ESL) nursing students: strategies for building verbal and written language skills.将英语作为第二语言(ESL)的护理专业学生:培养口头和书面语言技能的策略。
J Cult Divers. 2003 Winter;10(4):113-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Construction and Writing Flaws of the Multiple-Choice Questions in the Published Test Banks of Obstetrics and Gynecology: Adoption, Caution, or Mitigation?已出版的妇产科题库中选择题的编写缺陷:采用、谨慎对待还是减轻?
Avicenna J Med. 2022 Aug 31;12(3):138-147. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1755332. eCollection 2022 Jul.