Division of Critical Care, Department of Pediatrics, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA.
Department of Pediatrics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA.
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2019 May;20(5):481-489. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000001891.
Rapid cycle deliberate practice is a simulation training method that cycles between deliberate practice and directed feedback to create perfect practice; in contrast to reflective debriefing where learners are asked to reflect on their performance to create change. The aim of this study is to compare the impact of rapid cycle deliberate practice versus reflective debriefing training on resident application and retention of the pediatric sepsis algorithm.
Prospective, randomized-control study.
A tertiary care university children's hospital simulation room, featuring a high-fidelity pediatric patient simulator.
Forty-six upper-level pediatric residents.
Simulation training using rapid cycle deliberate practice or reflective debriefing.
Knowledge was assessed with a quiz on core sepsis management topics. The application of knowledge was assessed with a sepsis management checklist during the simulated scenario. The residents were assessed before and after the intervention and again at a follow-up session, 3-4 months later, to evaluate retention. Both groups had similar pre-intervention scores. Post-intervention, the rapid cycle deliberate practice group had higher checklist scores (rapid cycle deliberate practice 18 points [interquartile range, 18-19] vs reflective debriefing 17 points [interquartile range, 15-18]; p < 0.001). Both groups had improved quiz scores. At follow-up, both groups continued to have higher scores compared with the pre-intervention evaluation, with the rapid cycle deliberate practice group having a greater change in checklist score from pre-intervention to follow-up (rapid cycle deliberate practice 5 points [interquartile range, 3.5-7] vs reflective debriefing 3 points [interquartile range, 1.5-4.5]; p = 0.019). Both groups reported improved confidence in diagnosing and managing septic shock.
Both rapid cycle deliberate practice and reflective debriefing are effective in training pediatric residents to apply the sepsis algorithm and in improving their confidence in the management of septic shock. The rapid cycle deliberate practice method was superior immediately post-training; however, it is unclear if this advantage is maintained over time. Both methods should be considered for training residents.
快速循环刻意练习是一种模拟训练方法,它在刻意练习和定向反馈之间循环,以创造完美的练习;而反思性讨论则是让学习者反思自己的表现以产生改变。本研究的目的是比较快速循环刻意练习与反思性讨论训练对住院医师应用和保留儿科脓毒症算法的影响。
前瞻性、随机对照研究。
三级保健大学儿童医院模拟室,配备高保真儿科患者模拟器。
46 名高级儿科住院医师。
使用快速循环刻意练习或反思性讨论进行模拟培训。
使用核心脓毒症管理主题的测验评估知识。在模拟场景中使用脓毒症管理检查表评估知识的应用。在干预前后以及 3-4 个月后的随访中对住院医师进行评估,以评估保留情况。两组的干预前评分相似。干预后,快速循环刻意练习组的检查表评分较高(快速循环刻意练习 18 分[四分位距,18-19] vs 反思性讨论 17 分[四分位距,15-18];p<0.001)。两组的测验分数均有所提高。随访时,与干预前评估相比,两组的评分均有所提高,快速循环刻意练习组从干预前到随访时的检查表评分变化更大(快速循环刻意练习 5 分[四分位距,3.5-7] vs 反思性讨论 3 分[四分位距,1.5-4.5];p=0.019)。两组均报告在诊断和处理感染性休克方面的信心有所提高。
快速循环刻意练习和反思性讨论都能有效地培训儿科住院医师应用脓毒症算法,并提高他们对感染性休克管理的信心。快速循环刻意练习法在培训后立即更有效;然而,目前尚不清楚这种优势是否能持续下去。这两种方法都应考虑用于培训住院医师。