de Castro Leandro Teixeira, Coriolano Andreia Melo, Burckart Karina, Soares Mislane Bezerra, Accorsi Tarso Augusto Duenhas, Rosa Vitor Emer Egypto, de Santis Andrade Lopes Antônio Sérgio, Couto Thomaz Bittencourt
Centro de Simulação Realística, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, Avenida Albert Einstein, 627, São Paulo, SP, 05652-900, Brazil.
Instituto Israelita de Ensino E Pesquisa, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil.
Adv Simul (Lond). 2022 Dec 28;7(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s41077-022-00239-8.
Rapid-cycle deliberate practice (RCDP) is a simulation-based educational strategy that consists of repeating a simulation scenario a number of times to acquire a planned competency. When the objective of a cycle is achieved, a new cycle initiates with increased skill complexity. There have been no previous randomized studies comparing after-event debriefing clinical manikin-based simulation to RCDP in adult cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR).
We invited physicians from the post-graduate program on Emergency Medicine of the Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein. Groups were randomized 1:1 to RCDP or after-event debriefing simulation prior to the first station of CPR training. During the first 5 min of the pre-intervention scenario, both groups participated in a simulated case of an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest without facilitator interference; after the first 5 min, each scenario was then facilitated according to group allocation (RCDP or after-event debriefing). In a second scenario of CPR later in the day with the same participants, there was no facilitator intervention, and the planned outcomes were evaluated. The primary outcome was the chest compression fraction during CPR in the post-intervention scenario. Secondary outcomes comprised time for recognition of the cardiac arrest, time for first verbalization of the cardiac arrest initial rhythm, time for first defibrillation, and mean pre-defibrillation pause.
We analyzed data of three courses conducted between June 2018 and July 2019, with 76 participants divided into 9 teams. Each team had a median of 8 participants. In the post-intervention scenario, the RCDP teams had a significantly higher chest compression fraction than the after-event debriefing group (80.0% vs 63.6%; p = 0.036). The RCDP group also demonstrated a significantly lower time between recognition of the rhythm and defibrillation (6 vs 25 s; p value = 0.036).
RCDP simulation strategy is associated with significantly higher manikin chest compression fraction during CPR when compared to an after-event debriefing simulation.
快速循环刻意练习(RCDP)是一种基于模拟的教育策略,包括多次重复模拟场景以获得计划的能力。当一个循环的目标达成后,新的循环会以增加技能复杂性的方式启动。此前尚无随机研究比较成人心肺复苏(CPR)中基于临床人体模型的事后汇报模拟与RCDP。
我们邀请了以色列阿尔伯特·爱因斯坦医院急诊医学研究生项目的医生。在CPR培训的第一站之前,将小组以1:1的比例随机分为RCDP组或事后汇报模拟组。在干预前场景的前5分钟,两组都参与了一个院外心脏骤停的模拟病例,且无引导者干预;在最初的5分钟后,每个场景根据小组分配(RCDP或事后汇报)进行引导。在当天晚些时候由相同参与者进行的CPR第二个场景中,没有引导者干预,并对计划的结果进行评估。主要结果是干预后场景中CPR期间的胸部按压比例。次要结果包括识别心脏骤停的时间、首次说出心脏骤停初始心律的时间、首次除颤的时间以及除颤前平均停顿时间。
我们分析了2018年6月至2019年7月期间举办的三门课程的数据,76名参与者分为9个小组。每个小组的参与者中位数为8人。在干预后场景中,RCDP小组的胸部按压比例显著高于事后汇报组(80.0%对63.6%;p = 0.036)。RCDP组在识别心律和除颤之间的时间也显著更短(6秒对25秒;p值 = 0.036)。
与事后汇报模拟相比,RCDP模拟策略在CPR期间与显著更高的人体模型胸部按压比例相关。