University of Utah College of Pharmacy, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA.
Clin Ther. 2019 Feb;41(2):303-313.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2018.12.014. Epub 2019 Jan 30.
Therapy for patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) not achieving hemoglobin (Hb) A targets may progress from an oral antidiabetic drug (OAD) to added basal insulin and then to multiple daily injections of basal-bolus insulin (MDI); however, the relative clinical and economic burden experienced by patients prescribed MDI for T2DM is not well quantified. The intent of this work was to describe direct medical costs, health care resource utilization, and glycemic control in patients with T2DM exposed to MDI in a clinical practice setting.
This retrospective cohort study used administrative claims data (2012-2015, United States) from patients aged 18 to 64 years with T2DM prescribed OAD, basal insulin, or MDI therapy. Eligible patients had continuous enrollment from ≥6 months before to 12 months after the date of the index prescription drug claim. Patients eligible for inclusion in the MDI cohort had ≥2 pharmacy claims each for basal and bolus insulin from the index date through the postindex period. Glycemic control, defined as an HbA1c value of <7% during the last 9 postindex months, was assessed in a subset of patients with HbA data available from that period. Descriptive analyses were performed.
We identified 225,135 patients with T2DM and claims for an OAD (n = 188,230), basal insulin (n = 23,724), or MDI (n = 13,181). The mean age was 51 or 52 years in each cohort; 54% to 59% of patients in each cohort were men. The mean Charlson comorbidity index scores were 0.8, 1.4, and 1.8, respectively; the percentages of patients with obesity and diabetes-related complications were greatest in the MDI cohort compared with OAD and basal insulin cohorts. The mean direct medical costs (all-cause; year-2015 US $) were $9368 in the OAD cohort, $14,420 in the basal insulin cohort, and $25,624 in the MDI cohort; diabetes-related costs were $3396, $7285, and $13,538. In the OAD, basal insulin, and MDI cohorts, 7%, 9%, and 14% of patients had ≥1 hospitalization, and 17%, 20%, and 24% had ≥1 emergency department visit, while 5%, 7%, and 11% had ≥1 diabetes-related hospitalization, and 8%, 11%, and 15% had ≥1 diabetes-related emergency department visit. Glycemic control was found in 64%, 22%, and 15% of patients in the OAD, basal insulin, and MDI cohorts.
These findings suggest that patients prescribed MDI therapy for T2DM have greater disease burden, experience greater medical costs and health care resource utilization, and exhibit poorer glycemic control than do patients treated with OAD or basal insulin therapy.
对于未达到血红蛋白 (Hb) A1 目标的 2 型糖尿病 (T2DM) 患者,治疗可能会从口服降糖药 (OAD) 进展为添加基础胰岛素,然后进展为每日多次基础-餐时胰岛素 (MDI) 注射;然而,对于接受 MDI 治疗的 T2DM 患者,其经历的相对临床和经济负担尚未得到很好的量化。本研究的目的是描述在临床实践环境中接受 MDI 治疗的 T2DM 患者的直接医疗成本、医疗资源利用情况和血糖控制情况。
这是一项回顾性队列研究,使用了来自美国 2012-2015 年年龄在 18-64 岁之间的接受 OAD、基础胰岛素或 MDI 治疗的 T2DM 患者的行政索赔数据。符合条件的患者在索引药物索赔日期之前至少连续 6 个月且之后 12 个月内均有连续参保。符合 MDI 队列纳入标准的患者在索引日期至后索引期期间,每个基础和餐时胰岛素至少有 2 份药房索赔。在 HbA1c 数据可获得的最后 9 个月内评估了部分患者的血糖控制情况,定义为 <7%。进行了描述性分析。
我们确定了 225135 名患有 T2DM 且有 OAD(n=188230)、基础胰岛素(n=23724)或 MDI(n=13181)索赔的患者。每个队列的平均年龄均为 51 或 52 岁;每个队列中 54%-59%的患者为男性。平均 Charlson 合并症指数评分分别为 0.8、1.4 和 1.8;与 OAD 和基础胰岛素队列相比,MDI 队列中肥胖和糖尿病相关并发症的患者比例最高。OAD 队列、基础胰岛素队列和 MDI 队列的直接医疗费用(全因;2015 年美国美元)分别为 9368 美元、14420 美元和 25624 美元;糖尿病相关费用分别为 3396 美元、7285 美元和 13538 美元。在 OAD、基础胰岛素和 MDI 队列中,分别有 7%、9%和 14%的患者有≥1 次住院治疗,17%、20%和 24%的患者有≥1 次急诊就诊,而 5%、7%和 11%的患者有≥1 次糖尿病相关住院治疗,8%、11%和 15%的患者有≥1 次糖尿病相关急诊就诊。OAD、基础胰岛素和 MDI 队列中,分别有 64%、22%和 15%的患者血糖控制达标。
这些发现表明,与接受 OAD 或基础胰岛素治疗的患者相比,接受 MDI 治疗的 T2DM 患者的疾病负担更大,医疗成本和医疗资源利用率更高,血糖控制更差。