State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou City, China.
Optegra Eye Hospital, London, UK.
Lasers Med Sci. 2019 Sep;34(7):1345-1351. doi: 10.1007/s10103-019-02721-8. Epub 2019 Feb 2.
To compare the efficacy of 50% threshold power with 25% threshold power of 577-nm subthreshold micropulse laser (SMPL) for acute central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC). Prospective, interventional, non-randomized, comparative case series. A total of 54 patients (54 eyes) with acute CSC were enrolled. Twenty-four eyes received 25% threshold power and 30 eyes received 50% threshold power of 577-nm SMPL. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT), and complete absorption of subretinal fluid (SRF) were evaluated at 1 month and 3 months. The complete absorption rate of SRF in the 50% power group was significantly greater than that in the 25% power group at 1 month (70.0% vs 25.0%, p < 0.001) and at 3 months (83.3% vs 54.2%, p < 0.001). Mean BCVA improved from 0.34 ± 0.20 LogMAR to 0.02 ± 0.13 LogMAR in the 50% power group and from 0.27 ± 0.15 LogMAR to 0.14 ± 0.21 LogMAR in the 25% power group with a significant difference between the two groups after 3 months (p = 0.027). In the 50% power group, the CMT decreased from 491.6 ± 154.8 μm at baseline to 231.3 ± 92.3 μm at 1 month and 228.2 ± 88.1 μm at 3 months, and in the 25% power group, the CMT decreased from 444.9 ± 164.1 to 306.8 ± 102.6 μm at 1 month and 254.5 ± 101.7 μm at 3 months. There was statistical difference of CMT at 1 month (p = 0.009) but no significant difference at 3 months between the two groups (p = 0.232). SMPL with 50% threshold power may be more effective than 25% threshold power for acute CSC.
比较 577nm 亚阈微脉冲激光(SMPL)25%阈值和 50%阈值治疗急性中心性浆液性脉络膜视网膜病变(CSC)的疗效。前瞻性、干预性、非随机、对照病例系列研究。共纳入 54 例(54 只眼)急性 CSC 患者。24 只眼接受 25%阈值光,30 只眼接受 50%阈值光的 577nm SMPL 治疗。治疗后 1 个月和 3 个月分别评估最佳矫正视力(BCVA)、中心视网膜厚度(CMT)和视网膜下液(SRF)完全吸收情况。治疗后 1 个月时,50%阈值组 SRF 的完全吸收率明显高于 25%阈值组(70.0%比 25.0%,p<0.001),治疗后 3 个月时,50%阈值组 SRF 的完全吸收率明显高于 25%阈值组(83.3%比 54.2%,p<0.001)。50%阈值组治疗后 3 个月 BCVA 从 0.34±0.20 LogMAR 提高至 0.02±0.13 LogMAR,25%阈值组从 0.27±0.15 LogMAR 提高至 0.14±0.21 LogMAR,两组比较差异有统计学意义(p=0.027)。50%阈值组治疗后 1 个月 CMT 从基线时的 491.6±154.8μm 下降至 231.3±92.3μm,治疗后 3 个月时下降至 228.2±88.1μm,25%阈值组治疗后 1 个月 CMT 从基线时的 444.9±164.1μm 下降至 306.8±102.6μm,治疗后 3 个月时下降至 254.5±101.7μm。两组患者治疗后 1 个月 CMT 比较差异有统计学意义(p=0.009),治疗后 3 个月时差异无统计学意义(p=0.232)。50%阈值的 SMPL 治疗急性 CSC 可能比 25%阈值更有效。