Bristol Heart Institute, University of Bristol, School of Clinical Sciences, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019 Jun;157(6):2216-2225.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.12.002. Epub 2018 Dec 19.
Despite several reports, there are still conflicting data on the influence of ethnicity on mortality rates associated with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). We aimed to get further insights into the effect of race on mortality following CABG by performing a risk adjusted meta-analysis.
Relevant studies were searched on PubMed, Embase, BioMed Central, and the Cochrane Central register. Pairwise meta-analysis was used to estimate the relative risk of hospital death of black, Hispanic, and Asian patients using white patients as reference. Risk adjusted meta-analytic estimates were obtained using generic inverse variance methods with random effect model.
A total of 28 studies were selected for analysis. A total of 21 studies reported on hospital mortality in black (n = 222,892) versus white (n = 3,884,043) patients, 7 studies reported on Hispanic (n = 91,256) versus white (n = 1,458,524) and 9 studies reported on Asian (n = 27,820) versus white (n = 1,081,642). When compared with white patients, adjusted risk of hospital death was significantly greater for black patients (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.25; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.13-1.39; P < .001), and not statistically different for Asian (OR, 1.33; 95% CI, 0.99-1.77; P = .05) and Hispanic patients (adjusted OR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.94-1.23; P = .26). Meta-regression showed a significant trend toward lower mortality rates in most recent series in both black (P = .02) and white (P = .0007) and Asian (P = .01) but not for Hispanic (P = .41). However, as mortality rates were lower across the different races, the relative disadvantage between the study groups persisted, which may explain the lack of interaction between study period and race effect on mortality for black (adjusted P = .09), Asian (adjusted P = .63), and Hispanic (adjusted P = .97) patients.
The present meta-analysis showed that despite progress is being made in lowering in-hospital mortality rates among the major racial/ethnic groups, ethnical disparities in hospital mortality after CABG remain.
尽管已有多项报告,但在种族对冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)相关死亡率的影响方面仍存在相互矛盾的数据。我们旨在通过进行风险调整的荟萃分析,进一步深入了解种族对 CABG 后死亡率的影响。
在 PubMed、Embase、BioMed Central 和 Cochrane 中心注册处搜索相关研究。使用配对荟萃分析来估计黑人、西班牙裔和亚洲患者的住院死亡相对风险,以白人患者为参照。使用随机效应模型的通用倒数方差方法获得风险调整的荟萃分析估计值。
共选择了 28 项研究进行分析。共有 21 项研究报告了黑人(n=222892)与白人(n=3884043)患者的住院死亡率,7 项研究报告了西班牙裔(n=91256)与白人(n=1458524)患者的住院死亡率,9 项研究报告了亚洲人(n=27820)与白人(n=1081642)患者的住院死亡率。与白人患者相比,黑人患者的住院死亡风险调整后显著更高(调整后的优势比 [OR],1.25;95%置信区间 [CI],1.13-1.39;P<0.001),而亚洲人和西班牙裔患者的差异无统计学意义(OR,1.33;95%CI,0.99-1.77;P=0.05)和 1.08(95%CI,0.94-1.23;P=0.26)。荟萃回归显示,黑人(P=0.02)和白人(P=0.0007)以及亚洲人(P=0.01)的最近系列中死亡率呈显著下降趋势,但西班牙裔患者(P=0.41)则没有。然而,由于不同种族的死亡率较低,研究组之间的相对劣势仍然存在,这可能解释了种族对死亡率的影响与研究期间之间缺乏交互作用,这种交互作用在黑人(调整后 P=0.09)、亚洲人(调整后 P=0.63)和西班牙裔(调整后 P=0.97)患者中仍然存在。
本荟萃分析表明,尽管在降低主要种族/族裔群体的住院死亡率方面取得了进展,但 CABG 后住院死亡率仍存在种族差异。