Suppr超能文献

目标驱动、刺激驱动和历史驱动的选择。

Goal-driven, stimulus-driven, and history-driven selection.

机构信息

Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Institute Brain and Behavior Amsterdam (iBBA), Netherlands.

出版信息

Curr Opin Psychol. 2019 Oct;29:97-101. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.12.024. Epub 2019 Jan 7.

Abstract

In this paper, I present a framework which considers three independent factors that drive attentional selection. In addition to goal-driven and stimulus-driven selection, I discuss how lingering biases of selection history play a major role in attentional selection. Visual statistical learning of the regularities in the environment forms the basis for this history-based selection which provides an elaborate and flexible attentional biasing mechanism above and beyond goal-driven and stimulus-driven factors. A selection based on experience and history is fast, automatic and occurs without much, if any, effort. I conclude that learning and extracting the distributional properties of the environment have a major impact on attentional selection.

摘要

在本文中,我提出了一个框架,该框架考虑了驱动注意力选择的三个独立因素。除了目标驱动和刺激驱动的选择之外,我还讨论了选择历史的持久偏见如何在注意力选择中起主要作用。环境中规则的视觉统计学习为基于历史的选择提供了基础,这种选择提供了一种精细且灵活的注意力偏向机制,超越了目标驱动和刺激驱动因素。基于经验和历史的选择快速、自动,几乎不需要任何努力。我得出结论,学习和提取环境的分布特性对注意力选择有重大影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验