Micic Ivan, Kholinne Erica, Sun Yucheng, Kwak Jae-Man, Jeon In-Ho
Clinic for Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Clinical Center Nis, Nis, Serbia.
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, St. Carolus Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Adv Orthop. 2019 Jan 1;2019:8273018. doi: 10.1155/2019/8273018. eCollection 2019.
Several methods have been proposed to treat AO type C distal radius fracture. External fixator has gained popularity for its simple procedure and rapid recovery. Some surgeons suggested that additional K-wires may play a critical role in the outcome. The purpose of study is to evaluate the role of additional K wires in treating distal radial fracture with external fixator regarding its outcome.
From January 2006 to January 2010, 40 patients with AO type C distal radius fracture were treated with external fixator, with (EF) or without additional K wires (EFK). Radiologic outcome parameters include radial inclination, volar tilt, radial length, and the presence of radiocarpal arthritis according to Knirk and Jupiter. Clinical outcomes include New York Orthopedic Hospital (NYOH) wrist scoring scale.
Radiographic outcome showed significant difference in regard of articular congruency at the final follow-up with the EFK group showing the advantage in maintaining the articular incongruity. NYOH wrist scoring scale showed no significant difference between both groups at final follow-up. The amount of articular step-off was less in EFK group with significant statistical finding on the final follow up.
Both EF and EFK technique were able to provide satisfactory result in treating AO type C distal radius fractures. We observed that EFK is superior in reducing the number of radiocarpal arthritic changes compared to EF group due to its superiority in reducing articular step-off.
已提出多种方法治疗AO型桡骨远端骨折。外固定架因其操作简单、恢复快而受到欢迎。一些外科医生认为额外使用克氏针可能对治疗结果起关键作用。本研究的目的是评估在使用外固定架治疗桡骨远端骨折时额外使用克氏针对治疗结果的作用。
2006年1月至2010年1月,40例AO型桡骨远端骨折患者接受了外固定架治疗,分为使用额外克氏针组(EFK)和未使用额外克氏针组(EF)。放射学结果参数包括桡骨倾斜度、掌倾角、桡骨长度以及根据Knirk和Jupiter标准评估的桡腕关节炎情况。临床结果包括纽约骨科医院(NYOH)腕关节评分量表。
在末次随访时,放射学结果显示两组在关节一致性方面存在显著差异,EFK组在维持关节不匹配方面具有优势。NYOH腕关节评分量表显示两组在末次随访时无显著差异。在末次随访时,EFK组的关节台阶分离量较少,具有显著统计学差异。
EF和EFK技术在治疗AO型桡骨远端骨折方面均能取得满意结果。我们观察到,与EF组相比,EFK在减少桡腕关节关节炎变化数量方面更具优势,因为其在减少关节台阶分离方面具有优越性。