• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

前路、后路及经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术对人体腰椎振动特性影响的生物力学比较

Biomechanical comparison of the effects of anterior, posterior and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion on vibration characteristics of the human lumbar spine.

作者信息

Fan Wei, Guo Li-Xin

机构信息

a School of Mechanical Engineering and Automation, Northeastern University , Shenyang , China.

出版信息

Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2019 Apr;22(5):490-498. doi: 10.1080/10255842.2019.1566816. Epub 2019 Feb 4.

DOI:10.1080/10255842.2019.1566816
PMID:30714396
Abstract

Previous studies have compared the effects of different interbody fusion approaches on biomechanical responses of the lumbar spine to static loadings. However, very few have dealt with the whole body vibration (WBV) condition that is typically present in vehicles. This study was designed to determine the biomechanical differences among anterior, posterior and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF, PLIF and TLIF) under vertical WBV. A previously developed and validated finite element (FE) model of the intact L1-sacrum human lumbar spine was modified to simulate ALIF, PLIF and TLIF with bilateral pedicle screw fixation at L4-L5. Comparative studies on dynamic responses to the axial cyclic loading in these developed models were conducted. The results showed that at the fused L4-L5 level, dynamic responses of the von-Mises stress in L4 inferior and L5 superior endplates for the ALIF, PLIF and TLIF models were increased compared with the intact model. The endplate stresses in the TLIF model were lower than in the ALIF and PLIF models, but the TLIF generated greater stresses in the screws and rods compared with the ALIF and PLIF. At other levels, a decrease in dynamic responses of the disc bulge, annulus stress and intradiscal pressure was observed in all the fusion models compared with the intact one, but there was no obvious difference in these dynamic responses among the ALIF, PLIF and TLIF models. These findings might be useful in understanding vibration characteristics of the whole lumbar spine after different types of fusion surgery.

摘要

以往的研究比较了不同椎间融合方法对腰椎在静态负荷下生物力学响应的影响。然而,很少有研究涉及车辆中常见的全身振动(WBV)情况。本研究旨在确定在垂直WBV条件下,前路、后路和经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术(ALIF、PLIF和TLIF)之间的生物力学差异。对先前开发并验证的完整L1-骶骨人腰椎有限元(FE)模型进行修改,以模拟L4-L5节段双侧椎弓根螺钉固定的ALIF、PLIF和TLIF。对这些开发模型在轴向循环载荷下的动态响应进行了对比研究。结果表明,在融合的L4-L5节段,与完整模型相比,ALIF、PLIF和TLIF模型中L4下终板和L5上终板的von-Mises应力动态响应增加。TLIF模型中的终板应力低于ALIF和PLIF模型,但与ALIF和PLIF相比,TLIF在螺钉和棒中产生的应力更大。在其他节段,与完整模型相比,所有融合模型中椎间盘膨出、纤维环应力和椎间盘内压力的动态响应均降低,但ALIF、PLIF和TLIF模型之间的这些动态响应没有明显差异。这些发现可能有助于理解不同类型融合手术后整个腰椎的振动特性。

相似文献

1
Biomechanical comparison of the effects of anterior, posterior and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion on vibration characteristics of the human lumbar spine.前路、后路及经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术对人体腰椎振动特性影响的生物力学比较
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2019 Apr;22(5):490-498. doi: 10.1080/10255842.2019.1566816. Epub 2019 Feb 4.
2
Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Versus Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Finite Element Analysis of the Vibration Characteristics of Fused Lumbar Spine.后路腰椎间融合术与经椎间孔腰椎间融合术:融合腰椎的振动特性有限元分析。
World Neurosurg. 2021 Jun;150:e81-e88. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.02.094. Epub 2021 Feb 27.
3
A comparison of the influence of three different lumbar interbody fusion approaches on stress in the pedicle screw fixation system: Finite element static and vibration analyses.三种不同腰椎椎间融合术方式对椎弓根螺钉固定系统内应力影响的比较:有限元静态与振动分析。
Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng. 2019 Mar;35(3):e3162. doi: 10.1002/cnm.3162. Epub 2018 Oct 30.
4
The Role of Posterior Screw Fixation in Single-Level Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion During Whole Body Vibration: A Finite Element Study.后路螺钉固定在全身振动期间单节段经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术中的作用:一项有限元研究
World Neurosurg. 2018 Jun;114:e1086-e1093. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.03.150. Epub 2018 Mar 30.
5
Does Lumbar Interbody Fusion Modality Affect the Occurrence of Complications in an Osteoporotic Spine Under Whole-Body Vibration? A Finite Element Study.全身体振动下腰椎体间融合方式是否会影响骨质疏松脊柱并发症的发生?一项有限元研究。
World Neurosurg. 2023 Aug;176:e297-e305. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2023.05.053. Epub 2023 May 22.
6
Bilateral pedicle screw fixation provides superior biomechanical stability in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a finite element study.双侧椎弓根螺钉固定在经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术中提供了更好的生物力学稳定性:一项有限元研究。
Spine J. 2015 Aug 1;15(8):1812-22. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2014.06.015. Epub 2014 Jun 28.
7
Biomechanical Evaluation of Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Coflex-F and Pedicle Screw Fixation: Finite Element Analysis of Static and Vibration Conditions.经皮椎间孔腰椎体间融合术(TLIF)与 Coflex-F 及椎弓根螺钉固定的生物力学评价:静态和振动条件下的有限元分析。
Orthop Surg. 2022 Sep;14(9):2339-2349. doi: 10.1111/os.13425. Epub 2022 Aug 10.
8
Biomechanical comparison of single-level posterior versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions with bilateral pedicle screw fixation: segmental stability and the effects on adjacent motion segments.单节段后路与经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术双侧椎弓根螺钉固定的生物力学比较:节段稳定性及对相邻运动节段的影响。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2010 Jun;12(6):700-8. doi: 10.3171/2009.12.SPINE09123.
9
Stress analysis of the implants in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion under static and vibration loadings: a comparison between pedicle screw fixation system with rigid and flexible rods.在静态和振动载荷下经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术植入物的应力分析:刚性和弹性棒的椎弓根螺钉固定系统的比较。
J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2019 Oct 18;30(10):118. doi: 10.1007/s10856-019-6320-0.
10
[Biomechanical study of different approach for lumbar interbody fusion surgeries under vibration load].[振动载荷下腰椎椎间融合手术不同入路的生物力学研究]
Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi. 2021 Oct 25;38(5):877-884. doi: 10.7507/1001-5515.202102010.

引用本文的文献

1
Recent advancement in finite element analysis of spinal interbody cages: A review.脊柱椎间融合器有限元分析的最新进展:综述
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2023 Mar 23;11:1041973. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1041973. eCollection 2023.