Fan Wei, Guo Li-Xin
a School of Mechanical Engineering and Automation, Northeastern University , Shenyang , China.
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2019 Apr;22(5):490-498. doi: 10.1080/10255842.2019.1566816. Epub 2019 Feb 4.
Previous studies have compared the effects of different interbody fusion approaches on biomechanical responses of the lumbar spine to static loadings. However, very few have dealt with the whole body vibration (WBV) condition that is typically present in vehicles. This study was designed to determine the biomechanical differences among anterior, posterior and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF, PLIF and TLIF) under vertical WBV. A previously developed and validated finite element (FE) model of the intact L1-sacrum human lumbar spine was modified to simulate ALIF, PLIF and TLIF with bilateral pedicle screw fixation at L4-L5. Comparative studies on dynamic responses to the axial cyclic loading in these developed models were conducted. The results showed that at the fused L4-L5 level, dynamic responses of the von-Mises stress in L4 inferior and L5 superior endplates for the ALIF, PLIF and TLIF models were increased compared with the intact model. The endplate stresses in the TLIF model were lower than in the ALIF and PLIF models, but the TLIF generated greater stresses in the screws and rods compared with the ALIF and PLIF. At other levels, a decrease in dynamic responses of the disc bulge, annulus stress and intradiscal pressure was observed in all the fusion models compared with the intact one, but there was no obvious difference in these dynamic responses among the ALIF, PLIF and TLIF models. These findings might be useful in understanding vibration characteristics of the whole lumbar spine after different types of fusion surgery.
以往的研究比较了不同椎间融合方法对腰椎在静态负荷下生物力学响应的影响。然而,很少有研究涉及车辆中常见的全身振动(WBV)情况。本研究旨在确定在垂直WBV条件下,前路、后路和经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术(ALIF、PLIF和TLIF)之间的生物力学差异。对先前开发并验证的完整L1-骶骨人腰椎有限元(FE)模型进行修改,以模拟L4-L5节段双侧椎弓根螺钉固定的ALIF、PLIF和TLIF。对这些开发模型在轴向循环载荷下的动态响应进行了对比研究。结果表明,在融合的L4-L5节段,与完整模型相比,ALIF、PLIF和TLIF模型中L4下终板和L5上终板的von-Mises应力动态响应增加。TLIF模型中的终板应力低于ALIF和PLIF模型,但与ALIF和PLIF相比,TLIF在螺钉和棒中产生的应力更大。在其他节段,与完整模型相比,所有融合模型中椎间盘膨出、纤维环应力和椎间盘内压力的动态响应均降低,但ALIF、PLIF和TLIF模型之间的这些动态响应没有明显差异。这些发现可能有助于理解不同类型融合手术后整个腰椎的振动特性。