Department of Psychology.
J Occup Health Psychol. 2019 Feb;24(1):1-3. doi: 10.1037/ocp0000140.
The set of studies in this issue focus on applied interventions in occupational health psychology (OHP), that is, interventions that are intended to treat employee health and well-being problems or prevent these problems from occurring in the first place. An issue regarding many past evaluations of the effectiveness of these treatments was the relatively weak research methods, especially in regard to obtaining comparable groups to study so that internal validity is enhanced. Many of the studies presented here used the classically recommended approach of random assignment to alleviate this potential problem. We can see that there are a variety of types of potential treatments in OHP, including interventions focusing on changing the employee, other people in the employee's workplace (supervisors or coworkers), the employee's job characteristics, or the organization's climate. Although the ultimate criterion variables in OHP are indicators of employee wellness, some studies focused on improving what might theoretically be mediating variables between the interventions and employees' actual health or well-being. These outcomes include reductions of work-nonwork conflict and stigma of mental illness potentially present in the organization, its supervisors, or employees' coworkers. We note that there are probably moderators of the effectiveness of the interventions, so that a treatment may work better in some people, some situations, and some times than others. Finally, it is interesting to note that the interventions and their studies may be geographically concentrated rather than distributed equally around the globe. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).
本期研究集中于职业健康心理学中的应用干预措施,即旨在治疗员工健康和福祉问题或预防这些问题发生的干预措施。过去许多此类治疗效果评估存在一个问题,即研究方法相对薄弱,尤其是在获得可比群体以提高内部有效性方面。这里介绍的许多研究都采用了经典推荐的随机分组方法来缓解这一潜在问题。我们可以看到,职业健康心理学中有多种潜在的治疗类型,包括关注改变员工、员工工作场所中的其他人(主管或同事)、员工工作特征或组织氛围的干预措施。尽管职业健康心理学的最终标准变量是员工健康的指标,但一些研究侧重于改善干预措施与员工实际健康或福祉之间的理论上的中介变量。这些结果包括减少工作与非工作冲突以及组织、其主管或员工同事中可能存在的精神疾病污名。我们注意到,干预措施的有效性可能存在调节因素,因此一种治疗方法在某些人、某些情况下和某些时间可能比其他情况更有效。最后,有趣的是,干预措施及其研究可能集中在某些地区,而不是在全球范围内均匀分布。(APA 版权所有,2019)。