• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

背景信号强度变化对前列腺 MRI 中癌症检测的影响。

The Influence of Background Signal Intensity Changes on Cancer Detection in Prostate MRI.

机构信息

1 Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland.

2 Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Universitätsmedizin Mainz, Mainz, Germany.

出版信息

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2019 Apr;212(4):823-829. doi: 10.2214/AJR.18.20295. Epub 2019 Feb 4.

DOI:10.2214/AJR.18.20295
PMID:30714830
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6430663/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to develop a scoring system for background signal intensity changes or prostate homogeneity on prostate MRI and to assess these changes' influence on cancer detection.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This institutional review board-approved, HIPAA-compliant, retrospective study included 418 prostate MRI examinations in 385 men who subsequently underwent MRI-guided biopsy. The Likert score for suspicion of cancer assigned by the primary radiologist was extracted from the original report, and histopathologic work-up of the biopsy cores served as the reference standard. Two readers assessed the amount of changes on T2-weighted sequences and assigned a predefined prostate signal-intensity homogeneity score of 1-5 (1 = poor, extensive changes; 5 = excellent, no changes). The sensitivity and specificity of Likert scores for detection of prostate cancer and clinically significant cancer (Gleason score ≥ 3+4) were estimated in and compared between subgroups of patients with different signal-intensity homogeneity scores (≤ 2, 3, and ≥ 4).

RESULTS

Interreader agreement on signal-intensity homogeneity scores was substantial (κ = 0.783). Sensitivity for prostate cancer detection increased when scores were better (i.e., higher) (reader 1, from 0.41 to 0.71; reader 2, from 0.53 to 0.73; p ≤ 0.007, both readers). In the detection of significant cancer (Gleason score ≥ 3+4), sensitivity also increased with higher signal-intensity scores (reader 1, from 0.50 to 0.82; reader 2, from 0.63 to 0.86; p ≤ 0.028), though specificity decreased significantly for one reader (from 0.67 to 0.38; p = 0.009).

CONCLUSION

Background signal-intensity changes on T2-weighted images significantly limit prostate cancer detection. The proposed scoring system could improve the standardization of prostate MRI reporting and provide guidance for applying prostate MRI results appropriately in clinical decision-making.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在建立一种前列腺 MRI 背景信号强度变化或前列腺匀质性的评分系统,并评估这些变化对癌症检测的影响。

材料与方法

本研究经机构审查委员会批准,并符合 HIPAA 规定,为回顾性研究,共纳入 385 名男性 418 次前列腺 MRI 检查,这些男性随后均接受了 MRI 引导下的活检。从原始报告中提取出初级放射科医生对癌症怀疑的 Likert 评分,并将活检核心的组织病理学检查作为参考标准。两名读者评估 T2 加权序列上的变化程度,并分配预先定义的前列腺信号强度均匀性评分 1-5(1=差,广泛变化;5=优,无变化)。在不同信号均匀性评分(≤2、3 和≥4)的患者亚组中,估计和比较 Likert 评分对前列腺癌和临床显著癌症(Gleason 评分≥3+4)检测的敏感性和特异性。

结果

信号强度均匀性评分的两位读者间的一致性较好(κ=0.783)。当评分较好(即较高)时,前列腺癌的检测敏感性增加(读者 1 从 0.41 增加到 0.71;读者 2 从 0.53 增加到 0.73;均 p≤0.007)。在检测显著癌症(Gleason 评分≥3+4)时,随着信号强度评分的增加,敏感性也增加(读者 1 从 0.50 增加到 0.82;读者 2 从 0.63 增加到 0.86;均 p≤0.028),尽管一位读者的特异性显著下降(从 0.67 下降到 0.38;p=0.009)。

结论

T2 加权图像上的背景信号强度变化显著限制了前列腺癌的检测。所提出的评分系统可以提高前列腺 MRI 报告的标准化,并为在临床决策中适当应用前列腺 MRI 结果提供指导。

相似文献

1
The Influence of Background Signal Intensity Changes on Cancer Detection in Prostate MRI.背景信号强度变化对前列腺 MRI 中癌症检测的影响。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2019 Apr;212(4):823-829. doi: 10.2214/AJR.18.20295. Epub 2019 Feb 4.
2
Multiparametric MRI in detection and staging of prostate cancer.多参数磁共振成像在前列腺癌检测与分期中的应用
Dan Med J. 2017 Feb;64(2).
3
Comparison of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System versions 1 and 2 for the Detection of Peripheral Zone Gleason Score 3 + 4 = 7 Cancers.前列腺影像报告和数据系统版本 1 和 2 用于检测外周区 Gleason 评分 3+4=7 癌的比较。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 Dec;209(6):W365-W373. doi: 10.2214/AJR.17.17964. Epub 2017 Oct 5.
4
Assessment of Prospectively Assigned Likert Scores for Targeted Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Transrectal Ultrasound Fusion Biopsies in Patients with Suspected Prostate Cancer.对疑似前列腺癌患者进行靶向磁共振成像-经直肠超声融合活检的前瞻性指定李克特评分评估。
J Urol. 2016 Jan;195(1):80-7. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.07.080. Epub 2015 Jul 17.
5
PI-RADS Version 2: Detection of Clinically Significant Cancer in Patients With Biopsy Gleason Score 6 Prostate Cancer.PI-RADS 版本 2:在前列腺癌活检 Gleason 评分 6 分的患者中检测临床显著癌症。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 Jul;209(1):W1-W9. doi: 10.2214/AJR.16.16981. Epub 2017 Apr 18.
6
Multi-reader evaluation of different image quality scoring systems in prostate MRI.多读者评估前列腺 MRI 中不同的图像质量评分系统。
Eur J Radiol. 2023 Apr;161:110733. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2023.110733. Epub 2023 Feb 9.
7
Diagnostic accuracy of biparametric vs multiparametric MRI in clinically significant prostate cancer: Comparison between readers with different experience.双参数与多参数 MRI 对临床显著前列腺癌诊断准确性的比较:不同经验读者间的比较。
Eur J Radiol. 2018 Apr;101:17-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2018.01.028. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
8
Value of the hemorrhage exclusion sign on T1-weighted prostate MR images for the detection of prostate cancer.T1 加权前列腺 MRI 图像中出血外溢征象对前列腺癌检测的价值。
Radiology. 2012 Jun;263(3):751-7. doi: 10.1148/radiol.12112100. Epub 2012 Apr 2.
9
Diagnostic accuracy of a five-point Likert scoring system for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evaluated according to results of MRI/ultrasonography image-fusion targeted biopsy of the prostate.根据前列腺MRI/超声图像融合靶向活检结果评估的磁共振成像(MRI)五点李克特评分系统的诊断准确性。
BJU Int. 2018 Jan;121(1):77-83. doi: 10.1111/bju.13972. Epub 2017 Aug 16.
10
Assessment of the Diagnostic Accuracy of Biparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Prostate Cancer in Biopsy-Naive Men: The Biparametric MRI for Detection of Prostate Cancer (BIDOC) Study.在未经活检的男性中,双参数磁共振成像对前列腺癌诊断准确性的评估:前列腺癌检测的双参数 MRI(BIDOC)研究。
JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Jun 1;1(2):e180219. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.0219.

引用本文的文献

1
Multi-reader evaluation of the prostate imaging quality score system version 2 (PI-QUAL V2) and its clinical application.前列腺影像质量评分系统第2版(PI-QUAL V2)的多阅片者评估及其临床应用。
Eur Radiol. 2025 May 16. doi: 10.1007/s00330-025-11667-1.
2
Risk factors for motion artifacts in fast spin-echo T2-weighted imaging of the prostate magnetic resonance imaging: a retrospective study.前列腺磁共振成像快速自旋回波T2加权成像中运动伪影的危险因素:一项回顾性研究。
Radiol Phys Technol. 2025 Jun;18(2):582-588. doi: 10.1007/s12194-025-00897-z. Epub 2025 Mar 21.
3
Quantitative Multi-Parametric MRI of the Prostate Reveals Racial Differences.前列腺定量多参数磁共振成像揭示种族差异。
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Oct 16;16(20):3499. doi: 10.3390/cancers16203499.
4
Impact of prostate MRI image quality on diagnostic performance for clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa).前列腺 MRI 图像质量对临床显著前列腺癌(csPCa)诊断性能的影响。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2024 Nov;49(11):4113-4124. doi: 10.1007/s00261-024-04458-7. Epub 2024 Jun 27.
5
Quantitative diffusion MRI in prostate cancer: Image quality, what we can measure and how it improves clinical assessment.前列腺癌的定量扩散 MRI:图像质量、我们可以测量的内容以及它如何改善临床评估。
Eur J Radiol. 2023 Oct;167:111066. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2023.111066. Epub 2023 Aug 25.
6
Taking PI-QUAL beyond the prostate: Towards a standardized radiological image quality score (RI-QUAL).超越前列腺的 PI-QUAL:迈向标准化的放射影像学质量评分(RI-QUAL)。
Eur J Radiol. 2023 Aug;165:110955. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2023.110955. Epub 2023 Jun 30.
7
[Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) v 2.1: Overview and Critical Points].[前列腺影像报告和数据系统(PI-RADS)v2.1:概述与关键点]
J Korean Soc Radiol. 2023 Jan;84(1):75-91. doi: 10.3348/jksr.2022.0169. Epub 2023 Jan 30.
8
Magnetic Fields and Cancer: Epidemiology, Cellular Biology, and Theranostics.磁场与癌症:流行病学、细胞生物学与治疗学。
Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Jan 25;23(3):1339. doi: 10.3390/ijms23031339.
9
[PI-RADS 2.1 and structured reporting of magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate].[前列腺影像报告和数据系统(PI-RADS)2.1版与前列腺磁共振成像的结构化报告]
Radiologe. 2021 Sep;61(9):802-809. doi: 10.1007/s00117-021-00868-6. Epub 2021 Jul 2.

本文引用的文献

1
MRI-Targeted or Standard Biopsy for Prostate-Cancer Diagnosis.MRI 靶向或标准活检用于前列腺癌诊断。
N Engl J Med. 2018 May 10;378(19):1767-1777. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1801993. Epub 2018 Mar 18.
2
The inflammatory microenvironment and microbiome in prostate cancer development.前列腺癌发展中的炎症微环境和微生物组。
Nat Rev Urol. 2018 Jan;15(1):11-24. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2017.167. Epub 2017 Oct 31.
3
Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS): a paired validating confirmatory study.多参数 MRI 和 TRUS 活检在前列腺癌(PROMIS)中的诊断准确性:一项配对验证性研究。
Lancet. 2017 Feb 25;389(10071):815-822. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32401-1. Epub 2017 Jan 20.
4
Beyond Prostate Adenocarcinoma: Expanding the Differential Diagnosis in Prostate Pathologic Conditions.超越前列腺腺癌:扩大前列腺病理状况的鉴别诊断范围
Radiographics. 2016 Jul-Aug;36(4):1055-75. doi: 10.1148/rg.2016150226. Epub 2016 Jun 17.
5
PI-RADS Prostate Imaging - Reporting and Data System: 2015, Version 2.PI-RADS前列腺影像报告和数据系统:2015版,第2版
Eur Urol. 2016 Jan;69(1):16-40. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.08.052. Epub 2015 Oct 1.
6
Mammographic breast density: impact on breast cancer risk and implications for screening.乳腺钼靶密度:对乳腺癌风险的影响及对筛查的意义。
Radiographics. 2015 Mar-Apr;35(2):302-15. doi: 10.1148/rg.352140106.
7
Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Ultrasound Fusion Targeted Biopsy: A Systematic Review.基于磁共振成像-超声融合靶向活检诊断临床显著前列腺癌的系统评价。
Eur Urol. 2015 Jul;68(1):8-19. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.10.026. Epub 2014 Nov 1.
8
Impact of delay after biopsy and post-biopsy haemorrhage on prostate cancer tumour detection using multi-parametric MRI: a multi-reader study.活检后延迟和活检后出血对多参数 MRI 检测前列腺癌肿瘤的影响:一项多读者研究。
Clin Radiol. 2012 Dec;67(12):e83-90. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2012.08.014. Epub 2012 Sep 13.
9
Detection of breast cancer with addition of annual screening ultrasound or a single screening MRI to mammography in women with elevated breast cancer risk.在乳腺癌风险升高的女性中,通过每年进行乳腺筛查超声或单次乳腺筛查 MRI 检查来检测乳腺癌。
JAMA. 2012 Apr 4;307(13):1394-404. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.388.
10
The effects of the period between biopsy and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging on cancer staging in localized prostate cancer.活检和弥散加权磁共振成像之间时间间隔对局限性前列腺癌分期的影响。
BJU Int. 2010 Oct;106(8):1148-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09287.x.