• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

资源理性分析:将人类认知理解为对有限计算资源的最佳利用。

Resource-rational analysis: Understanding human cognition as the optimal use of limited computational resources.

机构信息

Max Planck Institute for Intelligent Systems, Tübingen72076, Germany.

Departments of Psychology and Computer Science, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey08544,

出版信息

Behav Brain Sci. 2019 Feb 4;43:e1. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X1900061X.

DOI:10.1017/S0140525X1900061X
PMID:30714890
Abstract

Modeling human cognition is challenging because there are infinitely many mechanisms that can generate any given observation. Some researchers address this by constraining the hypothesis space through assumptions about what the human mind can and cannot do, while others constrain it through principles of rationality and adaptation. Recent work in economics, psychology, neuroscience, and linguistics has begun to integrate both approaches by augmenting rational models with cognitive constraints, incorporating rational principles into cognitive architectures, and applying optimality principles to understanding neural representations. We identify the rational use of limited resources as a unifying principle underlying these diverse approaches, expressing it in a new cognitive modeling paradigm called resource-rational analysis. The integration of rational principles with realistic cognitive constraints makes resource-rational analysis a promising framework for reverse-engineering cognitive mechanisms and representations. It has already shed new light on the debate about human rationality and can be leveraged to revisit classic questions of cognitive psychology within a principled computational framework. We demonstrate that resource-rational models can reconcile the mind's most impressive cognitive skills with people's ostensive irrationality. Resource-rational analysis also provides a new way to connect psychological theory more deeply with artificial intelligence, economics, neuroscience, and linguistics.

摘要

人类认知建模具有挑战性,因为有无数种机制可以生成任何给定的观察结果。一些研究人员通过对人类思维能够和不能做什么的假设来约束假设空间,而另一些研究人员则通过理性和适应性原则来约束它。经济学、心理学、神经科学和语言学的最新研究开始通过用认知约束来增强理性模型,将理性原则纳入认知架构,以及应用最优性原则来理解神经表示,从而整合这两种方法。我们将理性地利用有限资源确定为这些不同方法的一个统一原则,并在一个名为资源理性分析的新认知建模范例中表达了这一原则。理性原则与现实认知约束的结合使资源理性分析成为反向工程认知机制和表示的有前途的框架。它已经为关于人类理性的辩论提供了新的视角,并可以在一个有原则的计算框架内重新审视认知心理学的经典问题。我们证明,资源理性模型可以将思维最令人印象深刻的认知技能与人们明显的非理性行为联系起来。资源理性分析还为更深入地将心理学理论与人工智能、经济学、神经科学和语言学联系起来提供了一种新方法。

相似文献

1
Resource-rational analysis: Understanding human cognition as the optimal use of limited computational resources.资源理性分析:将人类认知理解为对有限计算资源的最佳利用。
Behav Brain Sci. 2019 Feb 4;43:e1. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X1900061X.
2
Rational use of cognitive resources: levels of analysis between the computational and the algorithmic.认知资源的合理利用:计算层面与算法层面之间的分析层次
Top Cogn Sci. 2015 Apr;7(2):217-29. doi: 10.1111/tops.12142. Epub 2015 Apr 20.
3
The anchoring bias reflects rational use of cognitive resources.锚定偏差反映了认知资源的理性使用。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Feb;25(1):322-349. doi: 10.3758/s13423-017-1286-8.
4
Computational rationality: linking mechanism and behavior through bounded utility maximization.计算理性:通过有限效用最大化将机制与行为联系起来。
Top Cogn Sci. 2014 Apr;6(2):279-311. doi: 10.1111/tops.12086. Epub 2014 Mar 20.
5
Précis of bayesian rationality: The probabilistic approach to human reasoning.《贝叶斯理性:人类推理的概率方法》概要
Behav Brain Sci. 2009 Feb;32(1):69-84; discussion 85-120. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X09000284.
6
Rational adaptation under task and processing constraints: implications for testing theories of cognition and action.任务与加工限制下的合理适应:对认知与行动理论测试的启示
Psychol Rev. 2009 Oct;116(4):717-51. doi: 10.1037/a0017187.
7
Many faces of rationality: Implications of the great rationality debate for clinical decision-making.理性的多面性:理性大辩论对临床决策的影响。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2017 Oct;23(5):915-922. doi: 10.1111/jep.12788. Epub 2017 Jul 20.
8
Exploring the relationship between rationality and bounded rationality in medical knowledge-based systems.探索基于医学知识的系统中合理性与有限合理性之间的关系。
Artif Intell Med. 1993 Apr;5(2):125-42. doi: 10.1016/0933-3657(93)90013-s.
9
The rational status of quantum cognition.量子认知的理性地位。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2017 Jul;146(7):968-987. doi: 10.1037/xge0000312. Epub 2017 Apr 27.
10
Resource-rational Models of Human Goal Pursuit.人类目标追求的资源合理模型。
Top Cogn Sci. 2022 Jul;14(3):528-549. doi: 10.1111/tops.12562. Epub 2021 Aug 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Action subsampling supports policy compression in large action spaces.动作子采样支持在大型动作空间中进行策略压缩。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2025 Sep 5;21(9):e1013444. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1013444. eCollection 2025 Sep.
2
Cognitive biases as Bayesian probability weighting in context.认知偏差作为情境中的贝叶斯概率加权。
Front Psychol. 2025 Aug 6;16:1572168. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1572168. eCollection 2025.
3
Increased complexity of social category markers leads to diverse rule-based categorizations and reduced intergroup bias.
社会类别标记复杂性的增加导致了基于规则的多样化分类,并减少了群体间偏见。
Proc Biol Sci. 2025 Jul;292(2051):20250659. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2025.0659. Epub 2025 Jul 30.
4
Norms emerge through iterated learning.规范通过反复学习而形成。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025 Jul 22;122(29):e2504178122. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2504178122. Epub 2025 Jul 18.
5
Contractualist Moral Cognition: From the Normative to the Descriptive at Three Levels of Analysis.契约主义道德认知:从规范层面到描述层面的三个分析层次
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2025 Jul-Aug;16(4):e70011. doi: 10.1002/wcs.70011.
6
The temporal dynamics of metacognitive experiences track rational adaptations in task performance.元认知体验的时间动态追踪任务表现中的理性适应。
Commun Psychol. 2025 Jul 3;3(1):96. doi: 10.1038/s44271-025-00282-x.
7
Biomimicry as a decision-making methodology in condition monitoring.作为状态监测中决策方法的仿生学
Front Artif Intell. 2025 May 30;8:1485489. doi: 10.3389/frai.2025.1485489. eCollection 2025.
8
A Rational Framework for Group-Based Selective Social Learning.基于群体的选择性社会学习的理性框架。
Open Mind (Camb). 2025 May 9;9:677-708. doi: 10.1162/opmi_a_00205. eCollection 2025.
9
Humans learn generalizable representations through efficient coding.人类通过高效编码学习可泛化的表征。
Nat Commun. 2025 Apr 29;16(1):3989. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-58848-6.
10
Adaptive planning depth in human problem-solving.人类问题解决中的适应性规划深度。
R Soc Open Sci. 2025 Apr 9;12(4):241161. doi: 10.1098/rsos.241161. eCollection 2025 Apr.