Suppr超能文献

脑定向放疗后囊性与实性脑转移瘤患者的局部控制。

Local control after brain-directed radiation in patients with cystic versus solid brain metastases.

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

Department of Biostatistics, Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

J Neurooncol. 2019 Apr;142(2):355-363. doi: 10.1007/s11060-019-03106-1. Epub 2019 Feb 4.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Brain metastases can be radiographically cystic or solid. Cystic metastases are associated with a greater intracranial disease burden and poorer oncologic outcomes, but the impact of cystic versus solid appearance on local control after radiation remains unknown. We investigated whether cystic versus solid nature is predictive of local control after management with stereotactic or whole brain radiation (WBRT) and whether the radiation modality utilized is an effect modifier.

METHODS

We identified 859 patients with 2211 newly-diagnosed brain metastases managed with upfront stereotactic radiation or WBRT without preceding resection/aspiration at Brigham and Women's Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute between 2000 and 2015. Multivariable Cox regression with an interaction term and sandwich covariance matrix was used to quantify local failure.

RESULTS

Cystic lesions were more likely to recur than solid ones when managed with stereotactic radiation (HR 2.33, 95% CI 1.32-4.10, p = 0.004) but not WBRT (HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.62-1.36, p = 0.67), p-interaction = 0.007. 1 year local control rates for cystic versus solid metastases treated with stereotactic radiation were 75% versus 88%, respectively; estimates with WBRT were 76% versus 76%, respectively. However, no significant differences were noted between the two cohorts in post-radiation outcomes including all-cause mortality and neurologic death (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with brain metastases, stereotactic radiation yields improved local control and less morbidity than WBRT, and consequently for many patients the cystic versus solid designation does not impact treatment selection. However, our results suggest that in patients with a large number of cystic brain metastases, a lower threshold to consider WBRT, as opposed to stereotactic radiation, should be employed. If our results can be confirmed, further investigation into the underlying mechanism(s) would be warranted.

摘要

目的

脑转移瘤在影像学上可以是囊性或实性的。囊性转移瘤与颅内疾病负担较大和肿瘤学预后较差相关,但囊性与实性外观对放疗后局部控制的影响尚不清楚。我们研究了在立体定向或全脑放疗(WBRT)治疗后,囊性与实性外观是否与局部控制相关,以及所使用的放疗方式是否是一个影响因素。

方法

我们在 2000 年至 2015 年期间,在布莱根妇女医院/达纳法伯癌症研究所,鉴定了 859 名患者,他们有 2211 例新诊断的脑转移瘤,在接受立体定向放疗或 WBRT 治疗前未进行手术切除/抽吸。采用多变量 Cox 回归分析,带有交互项和夹心协方差矩阵,以量化局部失败。

结果

与接受 WBRT 治疗的患者相比,接受立体定向放疗的患者中,囊性病变更有可能复发(HR 2.33,95% CI 1.32-4.10,p=0.004),而不是 WBRT(HR 0.92,95% CI 0.62-1.36,p=0.67),p 交互=0.007。接受立体定向放疗的囊性与实性转移瘤的 1 年局部控制率分别为 75%和 88%;WBRT 的相应估计值分别为 76%和 76%。然而,在放疗后结局(包括全因死亡率和神经死亡)方面,两组之间没有显著差异(p>0.05)。

结论

在脑转移瘤患者中,立体定向放疗比 WBRT 产生更好的局部控制和更少的发病率,因此对于许多患者,囊性与实性的分类并不影响治疗选择。然而,我们的结果表明,对于大量囊性脑转移瘤的患者,应该考虑采用 WBRT 而不是立体定向放疗,因为其阈值较低。如果我们的结果可以得到证实,那么就有必要对潜在的机制进行进一步的研究。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验