Suppr超能文献

景观美化对土地退化中性的妥协:以地中海农业景观中的土壤侵蚀为例。

Landscaping compromises for land degradation neutrality: The case of soil erosion in a Mediterranean agricultural landscape.

机构信息

Research Group Ecohydrology and Landscape Evaluation, Ernst-Reuter PLatz 1, DE, 10623, Berlin, Germany; LISAH, INRA, IRD, Montpellier SupAgro, Univ Montpellier, FR, 34060, Montpellier, France.

Agroécologie, AgroSup Dijon, INRA, Univ. Bourgogne, Univ. Bourgogne Franche-Comté, F-21000, Dijon, France.

出版信息

J Environ Manage. 2019 Apr 1;235:282-292. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.01.063. Epub 2019 Feb 1.

Abstract

Soil erosion is the primary process driving land degradation. Using multiple scales of management to minimize soil erosion is crucial to achieve land degradation neutrality targets within the Sustainable Development Goals agenda. Land management (LM) influences both on-site and off-site erosion on the event-scale and over the long-term. However, each LM differs in effectiveness depending on the temporal scale considered. In order to understand how LM effects internal and external catchment dynamics, we apply LandSoil, a physically based landscape evolution model, to evaluate 7 LM scenarios over long- (30 years) and short-terms (event scale). LM scenarios included changes in land use and/or landscape structure. Under current LM, mean surface soil erosion was ∼0.69 ± 39·10 m over 30 years. In contrast, a single extreme event (435 mm/24 h) in January resulted in ∼0.62 ± 3·10 m loss and ∼0.04 ± 2·10 m if it occurred in October. Heterogeneous patterns of erosion and deposition developed after 30 years, whereas extreme events dominantly showed soil loss and high catchment connectivity. Effectiveness of LM in erosion mitigation and sediment trapping differed according to temporal and spatial scales for each scenario. We concluded that multiple temporal and spatial scales must be incorporated in order to adaptively manage land degradation and meet neutrality targets.

摘要

土壤侵蚀是土地退化的主要过程。采用多尺度管理来最小化土壤侵蚀对于实现可持续发展目标议程中的土地退化中性目标至关重要。土地管理(LM)在事件尺度和长期内都会影响到现场和场外的侵蚀。然而,每种 LM 的有效性因所考虑的时间尺度而异。为了了解 LM 如何影响内部和外部流域动态,我们应用基于物理的景观演化模型 LandSoil,来评估 7 种长期(30 年)和短期(事件尺度)的 LM 情景。LM 情景包括土地利用和/或景观结构的变化。在当前的 LM 下,30 年内的平均地表土壤侵蚀约为 0.69 ± 39·10 m。相比之下,在 1 月发生的一次极端事件(435mm/24h)会导致约 0.62 ± 3·10 m 的损失,如果发生在 10 月,则损失约为 0.04 ± 2·10 m。经过 30 年后,形成了不均匀的侵蚀和沉积模式,而极端事件主要表现为土壤流失和高流域连通性。每个情景的 LM 在侵蚀缓解和泥沙截留方面的有效性因时间和空间尺度而异。我们得出结论,为了自适应地管理土地退化和实现中性目标,必须纳入多时间和空间尺度。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验