• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同固位技术在 10mm 矢状劈开下颌支骨切开术中的比较评价。第二部分:有限元分析。

Comparative evaluation of different fixation techniques for sagittal split ramus osteotomy in 10 mm advancements. Part two: Finite element analysis.

机构信息

Piracicaba Dental School, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (Department of Oral Diagnosis), (Head: Jose Ricardo de Albergaria-Barbosa), State University of Campinas e UNICAMP, P.O. Box 52, Piracicaba, Sao Paulo, 13414-903, Brazil; Centro de Investigaciones del Colegio Odontológico (CICO), Institución Universitaria Colegios de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia.

Department of Prosthodontics and Periodontology, Piracicaba Dental School, State University of Campinas, Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2019 Jul;47(7):1015-1019. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2019.01.007. Epub 2019 Jan 21.

DOI:10.1016/j.jcms.2019.01.007
PMID:30718216
Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate three rigid, stable fixation methods for sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO), using finite element analysis. The hypothesis is that a customized miniplate presents better stress concentration and distribution.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A 3D model of a hemimandible was created, and a 10-mm-advancement SSRO was simulated and fixed as follows: 3-DCP group - one custom miniplate fixed by eight screws; 4-H2P group - two miniplates of four holes each, fixed by eight screws; and 6-H2P group - two miniplates of six holes each fixed by 12 screws. After a vertical loading of 100 N, the values for von Mises stress, modified von Mises stress, and maximum and minimum principal stresses were measured.

RESULTS

The area of maximum principal stress was similar for the three groups - located in the upper miniplate, in the screw near the proximal segment osteotomy. The maximum von Mises stresses were 1580.4 MPa, 1005 MPa, and 977.56 MPa for the 3DCP, 4-H2P, and 6-H2P groups, respectively, showing an allowable displacement of 2.57 mm, 1.62 mm, and 1.52 mm for the 3DCP, 4-H2P, and 6-H2P groups, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The customized miniplate did not present better stress distribution than two commonly used types of fixation. Fixation with two straight miniplates, either with four or six holes, offers adequate resistance for 10 mm linear advancements.

摘要

目的

通过有限元分析评估三种用于矢状劈开截骨术(SSRO)的刚性、稳定固定方法。假设定制微型板具有更好的应力集中和分布。

材料和方法

创建了一个半下颌骨的 3D 模型,并模拟和固定了 10mm 推进的 SSRO,具体方法如下:3-DCP 组-一个定制的微型板用 8 个螺钉固定;4-H2P 组-两个每个有四个孔的微型板,用 8 个螺钉固定;6-H2P 组-两个每个有六个孔的微型板用 12 个螺钉固定。在垂直加载 100N 后,测量了 von Mises 应力、修正 von Mises 应力、最大和最小主应力的值。

结果

三组的最大主应力区域相似-位于上微型板、靠近近段骨切开术的螺钉附近。3DCP、4-H2P 和 6-H2P 组的最大 von Mises 应力分别为 1580.4MPa、1005MPa 和 977.56MPa,3DCP、4-H2P 和 6-H2P 组的允许位移分别为 2.57mm、1.62mm 和 1.52mm。

结论

定制微型板的应力分布并不优于两种常用的固定类型。用两个直微型板固定,每个微型板有四个或六个孔,可提供 10mm 线性推进的足够阻力。

相似文献

1
Comparative evaluation of different fixation techniques for sagittal split ramus osteotomy in 10 mm advancements. Part two: Finite element analysis.不同固位技术在 10mm 矢状劈开下颌支骨切开术中的比较评价。第二部分:有限元分析。
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2019 Jul;47(7):1015-1019. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2019.01.007. Epub 2019 Jan 21.
2
Comparative evaluation of different fixation techniques of the sagittal split ramus osteotomy in 10 mm advancements: Mechanical testing and screw insertion torque.不同矢状劈开截骨术 10mm 骨段前移固定技术的比较评价:力学测试和螺钉旋入扭矩。
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2018 Dec;46(12):2082-2087. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2018.09.011. Epub 2018 Sep 26.
3
Comperative evaluation of the current and new design miniplate fixation techniques of the advanced sagittal split ramus osteotomy using three-dimensional finite element analysis.采用三维有限元分析法对当前和新型设计的下颌升支矢状劈开截骨术微型接骨板固定技术的比较评估。
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2023 Nov 1;28(6):e553-e561. doi: 10.4317/medoral.25964.
4
Comparative evaluation of stress distribution and transverse displacement of novel designs of miniplates for sagittal split ramus osteotomy in 10 mm advancements: a finite element analysis.新型 10mm 矢状劈开截骨术微型钢板的应力分布和横向位移的比较评价:有限元分析。
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2022 Nov;60(9):1266-1272. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2022.07.011. Epub 2022 Jul 30.
5
Biomechanical Evaluation of Seven Fixation Methods for Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy with Four Advancement Levels by Finite Element Analysis.通过有限元分析对矢状劈开下颌支截骨术四种前移水平的七种固定方法进行生物力学评估。
Front Surg. 2022 May 4;9:891747. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.891747. eCollection 2022.
6
Comparison of five different fixation techniques of sagittal split ramus osteotomy using three-dimensional finite elements analysis.三维有限元分析比较五种不同矢状劈开下颌支骨切开术的固定技术。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012 Aug;41(8):934-41. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2012.03.018. Epub 2012 Apr 15.
7
Assessment of sagittal split ramus osteotomy rigid internal fixation techniques using a finite element method.使用有限元方法评估下颌升支矢状劈开截骨坚固内固定技术
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015 Jul;44(7):823-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2015.02.006. Epub 2015 Mar 9.
8
Does fixation method affects temporomandibular joints after mandibular advancement?固定方式是否会影响下颌前伸术后的颞下颌关节?
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2018 Jun;46(6):923-931. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2018.03.024. Epub 2018 Apr 7.
9
Analysis of stress distribution on fixation of bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy with resorbable plates and screws using the finite-element method.使用有限元方法分析可吸收接骨板和螺钉固定双侧下颌支矢状劈开截骨术时的应力分布。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012 Jun;70(6):1434-8. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2011.05.017. Epub 2011 Aug 6.
10
Stability of locking and conventional 2.0-mm miniplate/screw systems after sagittal split ramus osteotomy: finite element analysis.矢状劈开下颌支截骨术后锁定式和传统2.0毫米微型钢板/螺钉系统的稳定性:有限元分析
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009 Aug;108(2):174-7. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.03.051.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of two stable internal fixation techniques in mandibular ramus sagittal osteotomy: a three-dimensional finite element study.下颌支矢状劈开截骨术中两种稳定内固定技术的评估:三维有限元研究
Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2025 Feb 27;29(1):59. doi: 10.1007/s10006-025-01357-z.
2
Comperative evaluation of the current and new design miniplate fixation techniques of the advanced sagittal split ramus osteotomy using three-dimensional finite element analysis.采用三维有限元分析法对当前和新型设计的下颌升支矢状劈开截骨术微型接骨板固定技术的比较评估。
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2023 Nov 1;28(6):e553-e561. doi: 10.4317/medoral.25964.
3
Biomechanical Evaluation of Seven Fixation Methods for Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy with Four Advancement Levels by Finite Element Analysis.
通过有限元分析对矢状劈开下颌支截骨术四种前移水平的七种固定方法进行生物力学评估。
Front Surg. 2022 May 4;9:891747. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.891747. eCollection 2022.
4
Investigation of a Modified Novel Technique in Bilateral Sagittal Splitting Osteotomy Fixation: Finite Element Analysis and In Vitro Biomechanical Test.双侧矢状劈开截骨固定改良新技术的研究:有限元分析与体外生物力学试验。
Biomed Res Int. 2020 Jun 17;2020:8707389. doi: 10.1155/2020/8707389. eCollection 2020.