• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

高中生能帮助乳腺放射科医生提高在全视野数字化乳腺摄影中检测出漏诊乳腺癌病灶的能力吗?

Can high school students help to improve breast radiologists in detecting missed breast cancer lesions on full-field digital mammography?

作者信息

van Nijnatten T J A, Smidt M L, Goorts B, Samiei S, Houben I, Kok E M, Wildberger J E, Robben S G F, Lobbes M B I

机构信息

Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands.

Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands.

出版信息

J Cancer. 2019 Jan 1;10(3):765-771. doi: 10.7150/jca.30494. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.7150/jca.30494
PMID:30719176
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6360429/
Abstract

To investigate whether full-field digital mammography (FFDM) and contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM), evaluated by non-experienced high school students, improves detection of missed breast cancer lesions on FFDM, in the same cohort of patients. Non-experienced first- and second year high school students examined fourteen cases of patients diagnosed with breast cancer. These cases consisted of missed breast cancer lesions on FFDM by a breast radiologist. Sensitivity of assessment of the students on FFDM and CEM was analysed and compared with the initial results of the breast radiologists. A total of 134 high school students participated in this study. Mean age was 12.8 years (range 10-14). Based on FFDM, mean overall sensitivity of the students was 29.2% (18.9 - 39.6%). When recombined CEM images were used, mean overall sensitivity of students improved to 82.6% (74.0 - 91.2%) (p=0.001). Mean overall sensitivity of FFDM exams evaluated by radiologists was 75.7% (64.2 - 87.3%), which was lower when compared to student's evaluations on recombined CEM exams, yet not statistically significant (p=0.098). Contrast-enhanced mammography evaluated by non-experienced high school students might improve detection rate of breast cancer when compared to evaluations of only full-field digital mammography by radiologists.

摘要

为了调查在同一组患者中,由没有经验的高中生评估的全视野数字乳腺摄影(FFDM)和对比增强乳腺摄影(CEM)是否能提高FFDM上漏诊的乳腺癌病灶的检出率。没有经验的高一和高二学生检查了14例被诊断为乳腺癌的患者病例。这些病例包括乳腺放射科医生在FFDM上漏诊的乳腺癌病灶。分析了学生对FFDM和CEM评估的敏感性,并与乳腺放射科医生的初始结果进行了比较。共有134名高中生参与了这项研究。平均年龄为12.8岁(范围10 - 14岁)。基于FFDM,学生的平均总体敏感性为29.2%(18.9 - 39.6%)。当使用重组CEM图像时,学生的平均总体敏感性提高到82.6%(74.0 - 91.2%)(p = 0.001)。放射科医生评估的FFDM检查的平均总体敏感性为75.7%(64.2 - 87.3%),与学生对重组CEM检查的评估相比更低,但无统计学意义(p = 0.098)。与仅由放射科医生进行全视野数字乳腺摄影评估相比,由没有经验的高中生评估的对比增强乳腺摄影可能会提高乳腺癌的检出率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b36/6360429/4ead72a6d654/jcav10p0765g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b36/6360429/f7353a0d9839/jcav10p0765g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b36/6360429/4ead72a6d654/jcav10p0765g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b36/6360429/f7353a0d9839/jcav10p0765g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b36/6360429/4ead72a6d654/jcav10p0765g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Can high school students help to improve breast radiologists in detecting missed breast cancer lesions on full-field digital mammography?高中生能帮助乳腺放射科医生提高在全视野数字化乳腺摄影中检测出漏诊乳腺癌病灶的能力吗?
J Cancer. 2019 Jan 1;10(3):765-771. doi: 10.7150/jca.30494. eCollection 2019.
2
Reversal of the hanging protocol of Contrast Enhanced Mammography leads to similar diagnostic performance yet decreased reading times.反转增强型乳腺造影术的悬挂协议可导致相似的诊断性能,但阅读时间减少。
Eur J Radiol. 2019 Aug;117:62-68. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2019.05.013. Epub 2019 May 15.
3
Diagnostic Accuracy and Incremental Value of Contrast-Enhanced Mammography Compared With Full Field Digital Mammography in a Tertiary Cancer Care Center.在三级癌症护理中心,对比增强乳腺X线摄影与全视野数字乳腺X线摄影相比的诊断准确性和增量价值。
Cureus. 2024 Sep 4;16(9):e68601. doi: 10.7759/cureus.68601. eCollection 2024 Sep.
4
Comparative Analysis of Diagnostic Performance of Automatic Breast Ultrasound, Full-Field Digital Mammography and Contrast-Enhanced Mammography in Relation to Breast Composition.自动乳腺超声、全视野数字乳腺摄影和对比增强乳腺摄影在不同乳腺组织构成中的诊断性能比较分析
Biomedicines. 2023 Dec 6;11(12):3226. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines11123226.
5
Comparison of radiologist performance with photon-counting full-field digital mammography to conventional full-field digital mammography.与传统全数字乳腺摄影相比,光子计数全数字乳腺摄影的放射科医生性能比较。
Acad Radiol. 2012 Aug;19(8):916-22. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2012.03.005. Epub 2012 Apr 24.
6
Image quality, lesion detection, and diagnostic efficacy in digital mammography: full-field digital mammography versus computed radiography-based mammography using digital storage phosphor plates.数字化乳腺摄影中的图像质量、病变检测及诊断效能:全视野数字化乳腺摄影与使用数字存储磷光板的计算机X线摄影乳腺摄影的对比
Eur J Radiol. 2008 Sep;67(3):487-96. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2007.08.016. Epub 2007 Sep 24.
7
Interval breast cancer characteristics before, during and after the transition from screen-film to full-field digital screening mammography.从屏-片乳腺摄影向全视野数字化乳腺筛查摄影转变之前、期间及之后的间期乳腺癌特征
BMC Cancer. 2017 May 5;17(1):315. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3294-5.
8
Comparison between two-dimensional synthetic mammography reconstructed from digital breast tomosynthesis and full-field digital mammography for the detection of T1 breast cancer.数字乳腺断层合成二维成像与全数字化乳腺摄影探测 T1 期乳腺癌的对比研究。
Eur Radiol. 2016 Aug;26(8):2538-46. doi: 10.1007/s00330-015-4083-7. Epub 2015 Dec 1.
9
Breast cancer: missed interval and screening-detected cancer at full-field digital mammography and screen-film mammography-- results from a retrospective review.乳腺癌:全数字化乳腺摄影和屏片乳腺摄影的间期和筛查检出癌——回顾性研究结果。
Radiology. 2012 Aug;264(2):378-86. doi: 10.1148/radiol.12112074. Epub 2012 Jun 14.
10
[Comparison of full-field digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis on assessment of the lesions in dense breast: a preliminary study].全视野数字乳腺摄影与数字乳腺断层合成技术在致密型乳腺病变评估中的比较:一项初步研究
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2013 Jan;35(1):33-7. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3766.2013.01.007.

引用本文的文献

1
Validation of Contrast-Enhanced Mammography as Breast Imaging Modality Compared to Standard Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.与标准乳腺X线摄影和数字乳腺断层合成相比,对比增强乳腺X线摄影作为乳腺成像方式的验证。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Jul 21;14(14):1575. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14141575.
2
Comparing the Diagnostic Performance of Contrast-Enhanced Mammography and Breast MRI: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.对比增强乳腺X线摄影与乳腺MRI的诊断性能:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
J Cancer. 2023 Jan 1;14(1):174-182. doi: 10.7150/jca.79747. eCollection 2023.
3
Contrast-enhanced mammography: what the radiologist needs to know.

本文引用的文献

1
Potential Cost Savings of Contrast-Enhanced Digital Mammography.对比增强数字乳腺摄影术的潜在成本节约
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 Jun;208(6):W231-W237. doi: 10.2214/AJR.16.17239. Epub 2017 Apr 5.
2
Volumetric breast density affects performance of digital screening mammography.乳腺体积密度会影响数字化乳腺筛查钼靶摄影的效果。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2017 Feb;162(1):95-103. doi: 10.1007/s10549-016-4090-7. Epub 2016 Dec 23.
3
Digital mammography screening: sensitivity of the programme dependent on breast density.数字化乳腺钼靶筛查:该项目的敏感性取决于乳腺密度。
对比增强乳腺摄影:放射科医生需要了解的内容。
BJR Open. 2021 Nov 24;3(1):20210034. doi: 10.1259/bjro.20210034. eCollection 2021.
4
Incorporating the clinical and radiomics features of contrast-enhanced mammography to classify breast lesions: a retrospective study.结合乳腺增强造影的临床和影像组学特征对乳腺病变进行分类:一项回顾性研究。
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2021 Oct;11(10):4418-4430. doi: 10.21037/qims-21-103.
5
Impact of full field digital mammography diagnosis for female patients with breast cancer.全视野数字化乳腺摄影诊断对女性乳腺癌患者的影响。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Apr;98(16):e15175. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000015175.
Eur Radiol. 2017 Jul;27(7):2744-2751. doi: 10.1007/s00330-016-4636-4. Epub 2016 Nov 7.
4
Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) versus breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): A retrospective comparison in 66 breast lesions.对比增强光谱乳腺摄影(CESM)与乳腺磁共振成像(MRI):66例乳腺病变的回顾性比较
Diagn Interv Imaging. 2017 Feb;98(2):113-123. doi: 10.1016/j.diii.2016.08.013. Epub 2016 Sep 26.
5
Diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography: Systematic review and meta-analysis.对比增强光谱乳腺摄影的诊断性能:系统评价与荟萃分析。
Breast. 2016 Aug;28:13-9. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2016.04.008. Epub 2016 May 7.
6
Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography in recalls from the Dutch breast cancer screening program: validation of results in a large multireader, multicase study.荷兰乳腺癌筛查项目召回病例中的对比增强光谱乳腺摄影术:大型多阅片者、多病例研究结果的验证
Eur Radiol. 2016 Dec;26(12):4371-4379. doi: 10.1007/s00330-016-4336-0. Epub 2016 Apr 20.
7
Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) and contrast enhanced MRI (CEMRI): Patient preferences and tolerance.对比增强光谱乳腺摄影(CESM)与对比增强磁共振成像(CEMRI):患者偏好与耐受性。
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2015 Jun;59(3):300-5. doi: 10.1111/1754-9485.12296. Epub 2015 Apr 21.
8
Evaluation of low-energy contrast-enhanced spectral mammography images by comparing them to full-field digital mammography using EUREF image quality criteria.通过使用欧洲参考框架(EUREF)图像质量标准将低能量对比增强光谱乳腺摄影图像与全场数字化乳腺摄影图像进行比较,对其进行评估。
Eur Radiol. 2015 Oct;25(10):2813-20. doi: 10.1007/s00330-015-3695-2. Epub 2015 Mar 27.
9
Global cancer statistics, 2012.全球癌症统计数据,2012 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2015 Mar;65(2):87-108. doi: 10.3322/caac.21262. Epub 2015 Feb 4.
10
The quality of tumor size assessment by contrast-enhanced spectral mammography and the benefit of additional breast MRI.对比增强光谱乳腺摄影术评估肿瘤大小的质量及额外进行乳腺磁共振成像的益处
J Cancer. 2015 Jan 5;6(2):144-50. doi: 10.7150/jca.10705. eCollection 2015.