Suppr超能文献

基底细胞癌的病理申请单和报告缺少重要信息。

Basal Cell Carcinoma Pathology Requests and Reports Are Lacking Important Information.

作者信息

Al-Qarqaz Firas, Bodoor Khaldon, Al-Tarawneh Awad, Eloqayli Haytham, Al Gargaz Wisam, Alshiyab Diala, Muhaidat Jihan, Alqudah Mohammad, Almomani Rowida, Marji Maha

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, Jordan University of Science and Technology, P.O. Box 3030, Irbid, Jordan.

Department of Applied Biology, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan.

出版信息

J Skin Cancer. 2019 Jan 3;2019:4876309. doi: 10.1155/2019/4876309. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most common cancer affecting humans. Luckily it has negligible risk for metastasis; however it can be locally destructive to surrounding tissue. The diagnosis of this tumor relies on clinical and dermoscopic features; however confirmation requires biopsy and histologic examination. Based on clinical and pathologic findings, BCC is classified as low or high risk subtype. The clinician requesting pathology examination for BCC should provide the pathologist with detailed information including patient details, relevant clinical and medical history, site and type of the biopsy, and whether this is a primary or recurrent lesion. The pathologist on the other hand should write an adequate report containing a minimum of core set of parameters including type of BCC, depth of invasion, presence of lymphovascular or perineural invasion, and the excision margins.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study is to evaluate whether requests by clinicians and pathology reports of BCC are adequate.

METHODS

This is a retrospective analysis done at the dermatology department, faculty of medicine at Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan. Reports for the period from January 2003 to December 2017 were retrieved and analyzed for data completeness.

RESULTS

Most clinical request forms of BCC provided by clinicians are inadequate and lack important relevant information especially in regard to lesion history, patient medical history, and whether BCC is a primary or a recurrent one. Pathology reports for BCC cases also have significant deficiency especially in describing the histologic subtype, depth of invasion, and presence of lymphovascular and perineural invasion. However, the tumor excision margins are adequately described in almost all reports.

CONCLUSIONS

The study shows that clinicians do not provide adequate clinical information when submitting a request for histopathologic examination of BCC. Similarly, pathologists write incomplete reports that lack important pathologic features. Having pre-set forms (electronic proforma) can help overcome missing information.

摘要

引言

基底细胞癌(BCC)是影响人类的最常见癌症。幸运的是,其转移风险可忽略不计;然而,它可能对周围组织造成局部破坏。该肿瘤的诊断依赖于临床和皮肤镜特征;然而,确诊需要活检和组织学检查。根据临床和病理结果,BCC被分为低风险或高风险亚型。要求对BCC进行病理检查的临床医生应向病理学家提供详细信息,包括患者详细信息、相关临床和病史、活检部位和类型,以及这是原发性还是复发性病变。另一方面,病理学家应撰写一份充分的报告,至少包含一组核心参数,包括BCC类型、浸润深度、是否存在淋巴管或神经周围浸润以及切除边缘情况。

目的

本研究的目的是评估临床医生的申请和BCC的病理报告是否充分。

方法

这是在约旦科技大学医学院皮肤科进行的一项回顾性分析,位于约旦伊尔比德。检索并分析了2003年1月至2017年12月期间的报告,以评估数据完整性。

结果

临床医生提供的大多数BCC临床申请表不充分,缺乏重要的相关信息,尤其是关于病变病史、患者病史以及BCC是原发性还是复发性的信息。BCC病例的病理报告也存在重大缺陷,尤其是在描述组织学亚型、浸润深度以及是否存在淋巴管和神经周围浸润方面。然而,几乎所有报告中对肿瘤切除边缘的描述都足够。

结论

该研究表明,临床医生在提交BCC组织病理学检查申请时未提供充分的临床信息。同样,病理学家撰写的报告不完整,缺乏重要的病理特征。使用预先设定的表格(电子表格)有助于克服信息缺失的问题。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d64/6335659/04e7ce5c1c67/JSC2019-4876309.001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验