Center for Value-Based Pharmacy Initiatives, UPMC Insurance Services Division, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Apr;34(4):631-633. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-04845-7. Epub 2019 Feb 4.
Polypharmacy has been linked to adverse outcomes including increased risk of hospitalization, falls, and death and contributes to unnecessary healthcare spending. Deprescribing efforts aim to reduce medication burden while improving or maintaining patients' quality of life. While the practice of deprescribing is gaining momentum, quality measurement and provider reimbursement are barriers that must be addressed for deprescribing to achieve widespread adoption. Because many quality measures are focused on medication use and adherence, deprescribing efforts may negatively impact primary care provider and health plan quality ratings and value-based reimbursement. In addressing this conflict, there are opportunities to proactively align the priorities and incentives of patients, providers, and plans to promote deprescribing. In this report, we propose several actionable steps to address quality and reimbursement-based barriers such as facilitating the exclusion of those engaged in deprescribing efforts from quality measures and the development of deprescribing-based quality measures.
药物过多已被证实与多种不良后果相关,包括住院风险增加、跌倒和死亡,并导致不必要的医疗支出。减药旨在减轻药物负担,同时改善或维持患者的生活质量。虽然减药实践正在兴起,但质量衡量和提供者报销是减药广泛采用必须解决的障碍。由于许多质量衡量指标都集中在药物使用和依从性上,因此减药工作可能会对初级保健提供者和健康计划的质量评级和基于价值的报销产生负面影响。在解决这一冲突时,有机会主动调整患者、提供者和计划的优先级和激励措施,以促进减药。在本报告中,我们提出了一些可行的步骤来解决质量和报销相关的障碍,例如为参与减药工作的人从质量衡量指标中排除,以及制定基于减药的质量衡量指标。