Suppr超能文献

药物减量干预研究结局指标的推荐意见。

Recommendations for outcome measurement for deprescribing intervention studies.

机构信息

Institute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA.

Department of Family Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA.

出版信息

J Am Geriatr Soc. 2022 Sep;70(9):2487-2497. doi: 10.1111/jgs.17894. Epub 2022 Jun 1.

Abstract

Interpreting results from deprescribing interventions to generate actionable evidence is challenging owing to inconsistent and heterogeneous outcome definitions between studies. We sought to characterize deprescribing intervention outcomes and recommend approaches to measure outcomes for future studies. A scoping literature review focused on deprescribing interventions for polypharmacy and informed a series of expert panel discussions and recommendations. Twelve experts in deprescribing research, policy, and clinical practice interventions participating in the Measures Workgroup of the US Deprescribing Research Network sought to characterize deprescribing outcomes and recommend approaches to measure outcomes for future studies. The scoping review identified 125 papers reflecting 107 deprescribing studies. Common outcomes included medication discontinuation, medication appropriateness, and a broad range of clinical outcomes potentially resulting from medication reduction. Panel recommendations included clearly defining clinically meaningful medication outcomes (e.g., number of chronic medications, dose reductions), ensuring adequate sample size and follow-up time to capture clinical outcomes resulting from medication discontinuation (e.g., quality of life [QOL]), and selecting appropriate and feasible data sources. A new conceptual model illustrates how downstream clinical outcomes (e.g., reduction in falls) should be interpreted in the context of initial changes in medication measures (e.g., reduction in mean total medications). Areas needing further development include implementation outcomes specific to deprescribing interventions and measures of adverse drug withdrawal events. Generating evidence to guide deprescribing is essential to address patient, caregiver, and clinician concerns about the benefits and harms of medication discontinuation. This article provides recommendations and an initial conceptual framework for selecting and applying appropriate intervention outcomes to support deprescribing research.

摘要

由于研究之间的结果定义不一致且存在差异,因此解释减药干预措施的结果以生成可行的证据具有挑战性。我们旨在描述减药干预措施的结果,并为未来的研究推荐衡量结果的方法。一项以治疗多种药物处方为重点的范围广泛的文献综述为一系列专家小组讨论和建议提供了信息。参与美国减药研究网络措施工作组的 12 名减药研究、政策和临床实践干预方面的专家,旨在描述减药结果并为未来的研究推荐衡量结果的方法。该范围综述确定了 125 篇反映 107 项减药研究的论文。常见的结果包括药物停用、药物适当性以及可能因药物减少而产生的广泛的临床结果。小组建议包括明确界定具有临床意义的药物结果(例如,慢性药物数量、剂量减少),确保有足够的样本量和随访时间来捕捉因药物停用而产生的临床结果(例如,生活质量[QOL]),并选择合适和可行的数据来源。一个新的概念模型说明了如何在药物测量初始变化的背景下解释下游临床结果(例如,跌倒减少),药物测量初始变化(例如,平均总药物减少)。需要进一步发展的领域包括针对减药干预措施的实施结果和药物撤药不良事件的衡量措施。生成指导减药的证据对于解决患者、护理人员和临床医生对药物停用的益处和危害的担忧至关重要。本文提供了建议和初步的概念框架,用于选择和应用适当的干预结果,以支持减药研究。

相似文献

1
Recommendations for outcome measurement for deprescribing intervention studies.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2022 Sep;70(9):2487-2497. doi: 10.1111/jgs.17894. Epub 2022 Jun 1.
3
Deprescribing: An umbrella review.
Acta Pharm. 2024 May 30;74(2):249-267. doi: 10.2478/acph-2024-0011. Print 2024 Jun 1.
7
The value of deprescribing in older adults with dementia: a narrative review.
Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol. 2021 Nov;14(11):1367-1382. doi: 10.1080/17512433.2021.1961576. Epub 2021 Aug 19.
8
Measuring Quality of Life in Deprescribing Trials: A Scoping Review.
Drugs Aging. 2024 May;41(5):379-397. doi: 10.1007/s40266-024-01113-0. Epub 2024 May 6.
9
Active deprescribing program in chronic kidney disease patients undergoing haemodialysis.
Nephrology (Carlton). 2021 Nov;26(11):890-897. doi: 10.1111/nep.13936. Epub 2021 Jul 15.
10
Deprescribing interventions in older adults: An overview of systematic reviews.
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 17;19(6):e0305215. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305215. eCollection 2024.

引用本文的文献

1
The US Deprescribing Research Network: a network to catalyze deprescribing science.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Jul 16;12:1622200. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1622200. eCollection 2025.
4
Opioid deprescribing: rethinking policies to facilitate better patient outcomes.
Pain Manag. 2025 Jul;15(7):413-423. doi: 10.1080/17581869.2025.2516409. Epub 2025 Jun 9.
5
Trials evaluating drug discontinuation: a scoping review sub-analysis focusing on outcomes and research questions.
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2025 May 27;25(1):146. doi: 10.1186/s12874-025-02597-z.
6
Towards a Balanced View of Benefits and Harms in Deprescribing Trials.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2025 Jun;73(6):1671-1673. doi: 10.1111/jgs.19473. Epub 2025 Apr 15.
8
Criteria to Report Adverse Drug Withdrawal Events in Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2025 Jun;73(6):1918-1928. doi: 10.1111/jgs.19457. Epub 2025 Mar 28.
10
Deprescribing in Australian residential aged care facilities: A scoping review.
Australas J Ageing. 2025 Mar;44(1):e13415. doi: 10.1111/ajag.13415.

本文引用的文献

1
Deprescribing for Community-Dwelling Older Adults: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Nov;35(11):3323-3332. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06089-2. Epub 2020 Aug 20.
2
Outcome Measures for Interventions to Reduce Inappropriate Chronic Drugs: A Narrative Review.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Oct;68(10):2390-2398. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16697. Epub 2020 Aug 11.
3
De-implementing wisely: developing the evidence base to reduce low-value care.
BMJ Qual Saf. 2020 May;29(5):409-417. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2019-010060. Epub 2020 Feb 6.
4
Adverse Outcomes of Polypharmacy in Older People: Systematic Review of Reviews.
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2020 Feb;21(2):181-187. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2019.10.022. Epub 2020 Jan 8.
5
Unpacking the complexities of de-implementing inappropriate health interventions.
Implement Sci. 2020 Jan 9;15(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s13012-019-0960-9.
6
Effect of medication reconciliation interventions on outcomes: A systematic overview of systematic reviews.
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2019 Dec 2;76(24):2028-2040. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/zxz236.
8
Does Deprescribing Improve Quality of Life? A Systematic Review of the Literature.
Drugs Aging. 2019 Dec;36(12):1097-1110. doi: 10.1007/s40266-019-00717-1.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验