Health Services & Policy Research, Exeter Collaboration for Academic Primary Care (APEx), University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Institut Universitari d'Investigació en Atenció Primària (IDIAP Jordi Gol), Barcelona, Spain.
J Intern Med. 2019 Mar;285(3):289-300. doi: 10.1111/joim.12881.
Multimorbidity, the simultaneous presence of multiple health conditions in an individual, is an increasingly common phenomenon globally. The systematic assessment of the quality of care delivered to people with multimorbidity will be key to informing the organization of services for meeting their complex needs. Yet, current assessments tend to focus on single conditions and do not capture the complex processes that are required for providing care for people with multimorbidity. We conducted a scoping review on quality of care and multimorbidity in selected databases in June 2018 and identified 87 documents as eligible for review, predominantly original research and reviews from North America, Europe and Australasia and mostly frequently related to primary care settings. We synthesized data qualitatively in terms of perceived challenges, evidence and proposed metrics. Findings reveal that the association between quality of care and multimorbidity is complex and depends on the conditions involved (quality appears to be higher for those with concordant conditions, and lower in the presence of discordant conditions) and the approach used for measuring quality (quality appears to be higher in people with multimorbidity when measured using condition/drug-specific process or intermediate outcome indicators, and worse when using patient-centred reports of experiences of care). People with discordant multimorbidity may be disadvantaged by current approaches to quality assessment, particularly when they are linked to financial incentives. A better understanding of models of care that best meet the needs of this group is needed for developing appropriate quality assessment frameworks. Capturing patient preferences and values and incorporate patients' voices in the form of patient-reported experiences and outcomes of care will be critical towards the achievement of high-performing health systems that are responsive to the needs of people with multimorbidity.
多发病,即个体同时存在多种健康状况,是目前全球范围内一种越来越普遍的现象。对多发病患者所接受的医疗服务质量进行系统评估,对于为满足其复杂需求而组织服务至关重要。然而,目前的评估往往侧重于单一病症,无法捕捉到为多发病患者提供护理所需的复杂流程。我们于 2018 年 6 月在选定的数据库中进行了一项针对医疗服务质量和多发病的范围界定审查,确定了 87 份符合审查条件的文件,主要为北美、欧洲和澳大拉西亚的原始研究和综述,且大多与初级保健环境相关。我们从感知挑战、证据和提出的指标等方面对数据进行了定性综合。研究结果表明,医疗服务质量与多发病之间的关联非常复杂,且取决于所涉及的病症(对于具有一致性病症的患者而言,医疗质量似乎更高,而对于不一致性病症的患者而言,医疗质量则更低)以及用于衡量医疗质量的方法(当使用针对病症/药物的特定流程或中间结果指标来衡量时,患有多发病的患者的医疗质量似乎更高,而当使用以患者为中心的护理体验报告来衡量时,医疗质量则更差)。患有不一致性多发病的患者可能会因当前的医疗质量评估方法而处于不利地位,尤其是当这些方法与经济激励挂钩时。为制定适当的医疗质量评估框架,需要更好地了解最能满足此类患者需求的护理模式。了解患者偏好和价值观,并将患者的声音纳入患者报告的护理体验和结果中,对于实现能够响应多发病患者需求的高效能卫生系统至关重要。