• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

鼓膜切开术在小手术室与手术室的成本和效率比较。

Cost and efficiency of myringotomy procedures in minor procedure rooms compared to operating rooms.

机构信息

Division of Pediatric Surgery, Children's Hospital, London Health Sciences Center, London, Ontario, Canada.

Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Laryngoscope. 2020 Jan;130(1):242-246. doi: 10.1002/lary.27840. Epub 2019 Feb 5.

DOI:10.1002/lary.27840
PMID:30720207
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Minor pediatric surgeries performed in the minor procedure room (MPR) may be more time efficient and less costly compared to those performed in the operating room (OR).

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective review.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study on cost and efficiency differences of bilateral myringotomy with tube insertions performed in the MPR versus the OR. Charts were reviewed from June 2015 to May 2017. Cost data was based on supply cost and case costing of medical personnel including nurses, aides, and anesthesia assistants.

RESULTS

Two hundred eighteen patients were included in the study. The median age was 2.7 years (range: 0.8-16.7), and there were no differences in gender between locations. One hundred twenty-three patients had surgery in the MPR (56.4%), and 95 had surgery in the OR (43.6%). The median length of time in the procedure room was 11 minutes shorter for patients who underwent surgery in the MPR (12.0 minutes, range: 3.0-33.0) compared to patients in the OR (23.0 minutes, range: 11.0-52.0; P < .0001). Median hospital stay (2.0 hours vs. 4.3 hours; P < 0.0001) and median patient turnover time (6.0 minutes vs. 14.0 minutes; P < .0001) was shorter in the MPR compared to OR. The total overall cost of a myringotomy with tube insertion, including labor and supply cost, was $189.41 in the MPR compared to $468.56 in the OR, a difference of $279.15 per case.

CONCLUSION

Bilateral myringotomy with tube insertions are more time and cost-efficient when performed in the MPR. This study supports the need for increased availability of MPR time for appropriate surgeries.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3 Laryngoscope, 130:242-246, 2020.

摘要

目的

与在手术室(OR)相比,在小手术室(MPR)进行的小儿小手术可能更省时、更省钱。

研究设计

回顾性研究。

方法

这是一项关于在 MPR 与 OR 行双侧鼓膜切开并置管术的成本和效率差异的回顾性研究。对 2015 年 6 月至 2017 年 5 月的病历进行了回顾。成本数据基于供应成本和包括护士、助手和麻醉助理在内的医务人员的病例成本。

结果

本研究共纳入 218 例患者。中位年龄为 2.7 岁(范围:0.8-16.7),不同部位的性别无差异。123 例患者在 MPR 行手术(56.4%),95 例患者在 OR 行手术(43.6%)。在 MPR 行手术的患者手术时间中位数比在 OR 行手术的患者短 11 分钟(12.0 分钟,范围:3.0-33.0 分钟)(P<0.0001)。MPR 组的中位住院时间(2.0 小时)比 OR 组短(4.3 小时;P<0.0001),患者周转时间(6.0 分钟)比 OR 组短(14.0 分钟;P<0.0001)。MPR 组和 OR 组的总成本(包括劳动力和供应成本)分别为每例 189.41 美元和 468.56 美元,差异为 279.15 美元。

结论

在 MPR 行双侧鼓膜切开并置管术更省时、更省钱。本研究支持增加 MPR 时间以进行适当手术的必要性。

证据等级

3 级喉镜,130:242-246,2020 年。

相似文献

1
Cost and efficiency of myringotomy procedures in minor procedure rooms compared to operating rooms.鼓膜切开术在小手术室与手术室的成本和效率比较。
Laryngoscope. 2020 Jan;130(1):242-246. doi: 10.1002/lary.27840. Epub 2019 Feb 5.
2
Outcomes of Orthopedic Hand Surgeries in Minor Procedure Rooms at a Veterans Affairs Medical Center.退伍军人事务医疗中心小型手术室的矫形手部手术结果。
J Hand Surg Glob Online. 2020 Nov 22;3(1):7-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2020.10.007. eCollection 2021 Jan.
3
Outpatient treatment suite: a safe and cost-effective venue to perform myringotomy and tubes placement in children.门诊治疗室:为儿童进行鼓膜切开术及置管的安全且经济高效的场所。
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2003 Nov;67(11):1159-68. doi: 10.1016/s0165-5876(03)00190-3.
4
Laser office ventilation of ears with insertion of tubes.激光辅助经耳道置管通气术
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2002 Jul;127(1):60-6. doi: 10.1067/mhn.2002.126475.
5
Cost-effectiveness analysis of implantable venous access device insertion using interventional radiologic versus conventional operating room methods in pediatric patients with cancer.儿童癌症患者采用介入放射学与传统手术室方法植入式静脉通路装置插入的成本效益分析。
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2010 May;21(5):677-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2010.01.014. Epub 2010 Mar 27.
6
Impact of resident surgeons on procedure length based on common pediatric otolaryngology cases.住院外科医生对基于常见小儿耳鼻喉科病例的手术时长的影响。
Laryngoscope. 2015 Apr;125(4):991-7. doi: 10.1002/lary.24912. Epub 2014 Sep 24.
7
Office-based insertion of pressure equalization tubes: the role of laser-assisted tympanic membrane fenestration.门诊压力平衡管置入:激光辅助鼓膜开窗术的作用
Laryngoscope. 1999 Dec;109(12):2009-14. doi: 10.1097/00005537-199912000-00022.
8
Comparison of transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement performed in the catheterization laboratory (minimalist approach) versus hybrid operating room (standard approach): outcomes and cost analysis.经导管主动脉瓣置换术在导管室(极简方法)与杂交手术室(标准方法)中的比较:结果和成本分析。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Aug;7(8):898-904. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2014.04.005. Epub 2014 Jul 30.
9
Procedural Sedation in Minor Procedure Rooms for Pediatric Myringotomy and Tympanostomy: A Quality Improvement Initiative.小儿鼓膜切开术和鼓室造瘘术中小手术间的程序性镇静:一项质量改进倡议。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022 Dec;167(6):979-984. doi: 10.1177/01945998211011066. Epub 2021 May 4.
10
Analysis of efficiency of common otolaryngology operations: comparison of operating room vs short procedure room in a pediatric tertiary hospital.儿童三级医院常见耳鼻喉科手术效率分析:手术室与短程序室的比较
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2003 Apr;129(4):435-7. doi: 10.1001/archotol.129.4.435.

引用本文的文献

1
The Safety of the Laryngeal Mask Airway in Adenotonsillectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.《腺样体扁桃体切除术应用喉罩气道的安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析》。
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024 Jan-Dec;53:19160216241263851. doi: 10.1177/19160216241263851.
2
In-office insertion tympanostomy tubes in children using single-pass device.使用单通道装置在门诊为儿童插入鼓膜造孔管。
Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2021 Feb 2;6(2):325-331. doi: 10.1002/lio2.533. eCollection 2021 Apr.