• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Ensuring the Quality of Multiple-Choice Tests: An Algorithm to Facilitate Decision Making for Difficult Questions.

作者信息

Dory Valérie, Allan Kate, Birnbaum Leora, Lubarsky Stuart, Pickering Joyce, Young Meredith

机构信息

assistant professor, Department of Medicine and Centre for Medical Education assessment administrator, Undergraduate Medical Education assistant professor, Department of Medicine assistant professor, Department of Neurology & Neurosurgery and Centre for Medical Education associate professor, Department of Medicine and Centre for Medical Education associate professor, Department of Medicine and Centre for Medical Education, McGill University-All authors are members of the Student Assessment Subcommittee, Undergraduate Medical Education, McGill University.

出版信息

Acad Med. 2019 May;94(5):740. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002627.

DOI:10.1097/ACM.0000000000002627
PMID:30720523
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
Ensuring the Quality of Multiple-Choice Tests: An Algorithm to Facilitate Decision Making for Difficult Questions.确保多项选择题测试的质量：一种有助于对难题进行决策的算法
Acad Med. 2019 May;94(5):740. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002627.
2
Decision-making around moving on from full-time education: the roles and experiences of parents of disabled young people with degenerative conditions.关于残疾青少年退行性疾病患者从全日制教育毕业的决策：父母的角色和经验。
Health Soc Care Community. 2012 Sep;20(5):477-87. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2011.01045.x. Epub 2012 Feb 24.
3
First-line urological evaluation in multiple sclerosis: validation of a specific decision-making algorithm.一线泌尿科评估多发性硬化症：特定决策算法的验证。
Mult Scler. 2013 Dec;19(14):1931-7. doi: 10.1177/1352458513489758. Epub 2013 May 22.
4
Sure enough: efficient Bayesian learning and choice.果然：高效的贝叶斯学习与选择。
Anim Cogn. 2017 Sep;20(5):867-880. doi: 10.1007/s10071-017-1107-5. Epub 2017 Jul 1.
5
The Bernese Hypothermia Algorithm: a consensus paper on in-hospital decision-making and treatment of patients in hypothermic cardiac arrest at an alpine level 1 trauma centre.伯尔尼低体温算法：一篇关于在高山一级创伤中心对处于低温心搏骤停的患者进行院内决策和治疗的共识文件。
Injury. 2011 May;42(5):539-43. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2010.11.037.
6
Interventions to support shared decision-making for women with heavy menstrual bleeding: A systematic review.支持月经过多女性共同决策的干预措施：一项系统评价。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017 Apr;211:156-163. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.02.026. Epub 2017 Feb 28.
7
[Continuing medical education: how to write multiple choice questions].继续医学教育：如何编写选择题
Radiologia. 2013 Jun;55 Suppl 1:S28-36. doi: 10.1016/j.rx.2013.01.001. Epub 2013 Mar 9.
8
Exploring differences in the use of the statin choice decision aid and diabetes medication choice decision aid in primary care.探讨初级保健中他汀类药物选择决策辅助工具和糖尿病药物选择决策辅助工具使用的差异。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2017 Aug 10;17(1):118. doi: 10.1186/s12911-017-0514-5.
9
Use of quality information in decision-making about health and social care services--a systematic review.健康与社会护理服务决策中质量信息的使用——一项系统综述
Health Soc Care Community. 2015 Jul;23(4):349-61. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12133. Epub 2014 Sep 22.
10
Tailoring and evaluating an intervention to improve shared decision-making among seniors with dementia, their caregivers, and healthcare providers: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.定制和评估一项干预措施以改善老年痴呆症患者、其护理人员和医疗服务提供者之间的共同决策：一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2018 Jun 25;19(1):332. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2697-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Quality of multiple-choice questions in medical internship qualification examination determined by item response theory at Debre Tabor University, Ethiopia.埃塞俄比亚德布雷塔博尔大学运用项目反应理论确定医学实习资格考试多项选择题的质量。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Aug 22;22(1):635. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03687-y.