• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

继续医学教育:如何编写选择题

[Continuing medical education: how to write multiple choice questions].

作者信息

Soler Fernández R, Méndez Díaz C, Rodríguez García E

机构信息

Servicio de Radiología, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario, A Coruña, España.

出版信息

Radiologia. 2013 Jun;55 Suppl 1:S28-36. doi: 10.1016/j.rx.2013.01.001. Epub 2013 Mar 9.

DOI:10.1016/j.rx.2013.01.001
PMID:23489769
Abstract

Evaluating professional competence in medicine is a difficult but indispensable task because it makes it possible to evaluate, at different times and from different perspectives, the extent to which the knowledge, skills, and values required for exercising the profession have been acquired. Tests based on multiple choice questions have been and continue to be among the most useful tools for objectively evaluating learning in medicine. When these tests are well designed and correctly used, they can stimulate learning and even measure higher cognitive skills. Designing a multiple choice test is a difficult task that requires knowledge of the material to be tested and of the methodology of test preparation as well as time to prepare the test. The aim of this article is to review what can be evaluated through multiple choice tests, the rules and guidelines that should be taken into account when writing multiple choice questions, the different formats that can be used, the most common errors in elaborating multiple choice tests, and how to analyze the results of the test to verify its quality.

摘要

评估医学专业能力是一项艰巨但不可或缺的任务,因为它能够在不同时间、从不同角度评估从业者所具备的专业知识、技能和价值观的程度。基于多项选择题的测试一直以来都是客观评估医学学习的最有用工具之一,并且仍将如此。当这些测试设计良好且使用正确时,它们能够促进学习,甚至可以衡量更高层次的认知技能。设计多项选择题测试是一项艰巨的任务,需要了解待测试的材料、测试准备方法以及准备测试所需的时间。本文旨在回顾通过多项选择题测试可以评估的内容、编写多项选择题时应考虑的规则和指南、可以使用的不同格式、编制多项选择题测试时最常见的错误,以及如何分析测试结果以验证其质量。

相似文献

1
[Continuing medical education: how to write multiple choice questions].继续医学教育:如何编写选择题
Radiologia. 2013 Jun;55 Suppl 1:S28-36. doi: 10.1016/j.rx.2013.01.001. Epub 2013 Mar 9.
2
Writing Multiple Choice Outcome Questions to Assess Knowledge and Competence.编写多项选择题结果类问题以评估知识和能力。
J Contin Educ Nurs. 2015 Nov;46(11):481-3. doi: 10.3928/00220124-20151020-11.
3
Assessment of item-writing flaws in multiple-choice questions.多项选择题中题目编写缺陷的评估
J Nurses Prof Dev. 2013 Mar-Apr;29(2):52-7; quiz E1-2. doi: 10.1097/NND.0b013e318286c2f1.
4
A novel student-led approach to multiple-choice question generation and online database creation, with targeted clinician input.一种由学生主导的新颖方法,用于生成多项选择题并创建在线数据库,同时有针对性地征求临床医生的意见。
Teach Learn Med. 2015;27(2):182-8. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2015.1011651.
5
Education techniques for lifelong learning: writing multiple-choice questions for continuing medical education activities and self-assessment modules.终身学习的教育技巧:为继续医学教育活动和自我评估模块编写多项选择题。
Radiographics. 2006 Mar-Apr;26(2):543-51. doi: 10.1148/rg.262055145.
6
Construct-irrelevant variance and flawed test questions: Do multiple-choice item-writing principles make any difference?与结构无关的方差和有缺陷的测试问题:多项选择题编写原则有作用吗?
Acad Med. 2002 Oct;77(10 Suppl):S103-4. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200210001-00032.
7
The frequency of item writing flaws in multiple-choice questions used in high stakes nursing assessments.高风险护理评估中使用的多项选择题的题目编写缺陷频率。
Nurse Educ Today. 2006 Dec;26(8):662-71. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2006.07.006. Epub 2006 Oct 2.
8
Journal Club: Prevalence of flawed multiple-choice questions in continuing medical education activities of major radiology journals.期刊俱乐部:主要放射学杂志继续医学教育活动中存在缺陷的多项选择题的患病率
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015 Apr;204(4):698-702. doi: 10.2214/AJR.13.11963.
9
Writing cognitive educational objectives and multiple-choice test questions.编写认知教育目标和多项选择题
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 1998 Nov 15;55(22):2397-401. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/55.22.2397.
10
[Is the formal quality of multiple choice questions used for continuing medical education influenced by guidelines for authors provided by the publishing houses?].[用于继续医学教育的多项选择题的形式质量是否受出版社提供的作者指南影响?]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2017 Apr;121:29-35. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2017.03.015. Epub 2017 Apr 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Technical flaws in multiple-choice questions in the access exam to medical specialties ("examen MIR") in Spain (2009-2013).西班牙医学专业准入考试(“MIR考试”,2009 - 2013年)中多项选择题的技术缺陷
BMC Med Educ. 2016 Feb 3;16:47. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0559-7.