Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Centre for Performance Science, Royal College of Music, London, United Kingdom.
PLoS One. 2019 Feb 5;14(2):e0211362. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211362. eCollection 2019.
There is a rich literature exploring emotional responses to engaging in artistic creative activities such as making music, writing, dancing and crafts. However, it remains unclear how such activities affect our emotions; specifically which mental processes ('strategies') are used to regulate our emotional responses. This paper therefore describes the design and validation of a novel instrument measuring types of emotional regulation strategies (ERSs) used when engaging in artistic creative activities: the Emotion Regulation Strategies for Artistic Creative Activities Scale (ERS-ACA). Using data from an initial pilot study (n = 740 adults, 80.4% female, median age 25-34) and a follow-up large internet sample (n = 47,924, 56.7% female, average age 47.3 ± 14.6 years), we followed a theory-driven iterative factor analysis process. Our analyses converged on a final 18-item scale comprising an overall 'general' factor of ERSs alongside three subscales: a 7-item factor comprising 'avoidance strategies' (such as distraction, suppression and detachment), a 6-item factor comprising 'approach strategies' (such as acceptance, reappraisal and problem solving), and a 5-item factor comprising 'self-development strategies' (such as enhanced self-identify, improved self-esteem and increased agency). All factors showed strong internal reliability (Cronbach's alpha: General Factor = 0.93, Factor 1 = 0.9, Factor 2 = 0.88, Factor 3 = 0.88). We confirmed strong convergent and divergent validity, construct validity, consistency of internal reliability and test-retest reliability of the scale in a third study (n = 165, 82.2% female, average age 46.3 ± 12.2 years). In conclusion, artistic creative activities appear to affect our emotions via a number of ERSs that can be broadly classified into three categories: avoidance, approach and self-development. The ERS-ACA scale presented and validated here should support further research into the use of ERSs when engaging in artistic creative activities and enhance our understanding about how these activities affect mental health.
有大量文献探讨了参与艺术创作活动(如制作音乐、写作、跳舞和手工艺)时的情绪反应。然而,目前尚不清楚这些活动如何影响我们的情绪;具体来说,是使用哪些心理过程(“策略”)来调节我们的情绪反应。因此,本文描述了一种新颖的测量工具的设计和验证,该工具用于测量参与艺术创作活动时使用的情绪调节策略(ERSs):艺术创作活动情绪调节策略量表(ERS-ACA)。使用初步试点研究(n=740 名成年人,80.4%为女性,中位数年龄为 25-34 岁)和后续大规模互联网样本(n=47924 名,56.7%为女性,平均年龄为 47.3±14.6 岁)的数据,我们遵循了一个基于理论的迭代因素分析过程。我们的分析收敛于一个最终的 18 项量表,包括一个整体的“一般”ERS 因素以及三个子量表:一个包含 7 项策略的因素(如分心、抑制和超脱),一个包含 6 项策略的因素(如接受、重新评估和解决问题),以及一个包含 5 项策略的因素(如增强自我认同、提高自尊和增强能动性)。所有因素均具有很强的内部可靠性(Cronbach's alpha:一般因素=0.93,因素 1=0.9,因素 2=0.88,因素 3=0.88)。我们在第三项研究(n=165 名,82.2%为女性,平均年龄为 46.3±12.2 岁)中确认了该量表的强聚合和发散有效性、结构有效性、内部可靠性的一致性和重测信度。总之,艺术创作活动似乎通过多种 ERS 影响我们的情绪,这些 ERS 可以大致分为三类:回避、接近和自我发展。本文提出并验证的 ERS-ACA 量表应支持进一步研究在参与艺术创作活动时使用 ERSs 的情况,并增进我们对这些活动如何影响心理健康的理解。