• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

脑栓塞后使用华法林或新型口服抗凝剂患者的住院时间及直接医疗费用

Hospitalization period and direct medical cost in patients using warfarin or novel oral anti-coagulants after a cerebral embolism.

作者信息

Akase Tomohide, Tsuchiya Takanori, Morita Masami

机构信息

Graduate School of Business, Japan University of Economics, 25-17, Sakuragaoka-cho, Shibuya-ku, Tokyo, 150-0031, Japan.

Pharmacy Management Institute, 25-17, Sakuragaoka-cho, Shibuya-ku, Tokyo, 150-0031, Japan.

出版信息

Int J Clin Pharm. 2019 Apr;41(2):546-554. doi: 10.1007/s11096-019-00792-9. Epub 2019 Feb 5.

DOI:10.1007/s11096-019-00792-9
PMID:30721382
Abstract

Background Warfarin has been used in Japan for a long time in patients after cerebral embolism to prevent recurrence. Recently, several novel oral anti-coagulants (NOACs) have been approved for use and are gradually replacing warfarin. However, it remains unclear whether warfarin and other NOACs differ from each other with respect to drug costs and length of stay (LOS) during treatment in Japan. Objective To assess differences in LOS and direct medical cost between patients after cerebral embolism treated with warfarin and those treated with NOACs. Setting Thirteen acute care hospitals in Japan. Method For hospitalized patients with cerebral embolisms who were treated with NOACs and/or warfarin between April 2012 and March 2014, we assessed LOS for patients with warfarin and NOAC using log-rank test, and stratified proportional hazard regression. Also, we assess direct medical cost using paired-t test. Main Outcome measure LOS and medical cost after first treatment with warfarin and NOAC. Results The median LOS for NOACs-treated patients was 12.5 days and that for warfarin treated patients was 19.0 days while the corresponding mean medical costs were USD 7151 ± 6228 [JPY 736,546 ± 641,437] and USD 8950 ± 5891 [JPY 921,830 ± 606,765]. The drug cost for NOACs-treated patients was higher but costs for laboratory-test and hospitalization were lower than those for warfarin-treated patients. Conclusions For NOAC-treated patients, LOS was shorter, and medical cost during hospitalization tended to be lower than those for warfarin-treated patients, whereas NOACs prices were higher than warfarin price.

摘要

背景

在日本,华法林长期用于脑栓塞患者以预防复发。最近,几种新型口服抗凝剂(NOACs)已获批使用,并逐渐取代华法林。然而,在日本,华法林和其他NOACs在治疗期间的药物成本和住院时间(LOS)方面是否存在差异仍不清楚。

目的

评估脑栓塞患者接受华法林治疗与接受NOACs治疗后的住院时间和直接医疗成本差异。

地点

日本的13家急症医院。

方法

对于2012年4月至2014年3月期间接受NOACs和/或华法林治疗的脑栓塞住院患者,我们使用对数秩检验和分层比例风险回归评估华法林和NOACs患者的住院时间。此外,我们使用配对t检验评估直接医疗成本。

主要观察指标

首次接受华法林和NOACs治疗后的住院时间和医疗成本。

结果

接受NOACs治疗患者的中位住院时间为12.5天,接受华法林治疗患者的中位住院时间为19.0天,相应的平均医疗成本分别为7151美元±6228美元[736,546日元±641,437日元]和8950美元±5891美元[921,830日元±606,765日元]。接受NOACs治疗患者的药物成本较高,但实验室检查和住院成本低于接受华法林治疗的患者。

结论

对于接受NOACs治疗的患者,住院时间较短,住院期间的医疗成本往往低于接受华法林治疗的患者,而NOACs的价格高于华法林。

相似文献

1
Hospitalization period and direct medical cost in patients using warfarin or novel oral anti-coagulants after a cerebral embolism.脑栓塞后使用华法林或新型口服抗凝剂患者的住院时间及直接医疗费用
Int J Clin Pharm. 2019 Apr;41(2):546-554. doi: 10.1007/s11096-019-00792-9. Epub 2019 Feb 5.
2
Novel oral anticoagulants vs warfarin for the management of postoperative atrial fibrillation: clinical outcomes and cost analysis.新型口服抗凝药与华法林用于术后房颤管理:临床结局与成本分析
Am J Surg. 2015 Dec;210(6):1095-102; discussion 1102-3. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2015.07.005. Epub 2015 Sep 18.
3
Comparison of hospital length of stay and hospitalization costs among patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation treated with apixaban or warfarin: An early view.阿哌沙班或华法林治疗非瓣膜性心房颤动患者的住院时间和住院费用比较:初步观察
J Med Econ. 2016 Aug;19(8):769-76. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2016.1171774. Epub 2016 Apr 24.
4
The cost savings of newer oral anticoagulants in atrial fibrillation-related stroke prevention
.新型口服抗凝药在预防心房颤动相关卒中方面的成本节约
Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2017 Mar;55(3):220-230. doi: 10.5414/CP202651.
5
Impact of atrial fibrillation and oral anticoagulation on hospital costs and length of stay.心房颤动和口服抗凝治疗对住院费用和住院时间的影响。
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2012 Feb 15;69(4):329-38. doi: 10.2146/ajhp110203.
6
Comparison of differences in medical costs when new oral anticoagulants are used for the treatment of patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolism vs warfarin or placebo in the US.在美国,新型口服抗凝剂用于治疗非瓣膜性心房颤动和静脉血栓栓塞患者时与华法林或安慰剂相比的医疗成本差异比较。
J Med Econ. 2015 Jun;18(6):399-409. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2015.1007210. Epub 2015 Feb 9.
7
Rivaroxaban versus Heparin Bridging to Warfarin Therapy: Impact on Hospital Length of Stay and Treatment Costs for Low-Risk Patients with Pulmonary Embolism.利伐沙班与肝素桥接华法林治疗:对低风险肺栓塞患者住院时间和治疗费用的影响。
Pharmacotherapy. 2016 Oct;36(10):1109-1115. doi: 10.1002/phar.1828. Epub 2016 Sep 19.
8
Hospital length-of-stay and costs among pulmonary embolism patients treated with rivaroxaban versus parenteral bridging to warfarin.接受利伐沙班治疗的肺栓塞患者与接受胃肠外桥接华法林治疗的肺栓塞患者的住院时间和费用比较。
Intern Emerg Med. 2017 Apr;12(3):311-318. doi: 10.1007/s11739-016-1552-1. Epub 2016 Oct 18.
9
Healthcare utilization and costs for patients initiating Dabigatran or Warfarin.开始使用达比加群或华法林的患者的医疗保健利用情况和费用。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017 Jun 21;15(1):128. doi: 10.1186/s12955-017-0705-x.
10
Pulmonary Embolism Inpatients Treated With Rivaroxaban Had Shorter Hospital Stays and Lower Costs Compared With Warfarin.与华法林相比,接受利伐沙班治疗的肺栓塞住院患者住院时间更短,费用更低。
Clin Ther. 2016 Nov;38(11):2496-2503. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2016.09.007. Epub 2016 Oct 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Analysis of the Introduction in Clinical Practice of New Oral Anticoagulants in Local Health Agency BT: Translation of the Clinical Trial Data to a Local Health Care Area.地方卫生局BT新口服抗凝剂临床应用的引入分析:临床试验数据向地方医疗保健领域的转化
Pharmaceutics. 2021 Feb 11;13(2):252. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics13020252.
2
Direct Oral Anticoagulants vs. Vitamin-K Antagonists in the Elderly With Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review Comparing Benefits and Harms Between Observational Studies and Randomized Controlled Trials.老年房颤患者中直接口服抗凝剂与维生素K拮抗剂的比较:一项系统评价,比较观察性研究和随机对照试验之间的获益与危害
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2020 Sep 10;7:132. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2020.00132. eCollection 2020.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Oral anticoagulants for primary prevention, treatment and secondary prevention of venous thromboembolic disease, and for prevention of stroke in atrial fibrillation: systematic review, network meta-analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis.口服抗凝剂用于静脉血栓栓塞性疾病的一级预防、治疗和二级预防,以及用于心房颤动的卒中预防:系统评价、网状荟萃分析和成本效益分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2017 Mar;21(9):1-386. doi: 10.3310/hta21090.
2
A cost-utility analysis for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in combination with warfarin and dabigatran based on the CHADS score in Japan.基于日本CHADS评分的房颤导管消融联合华法林和达比加群的成本效用分析。
J Cardiol. 2017 Jan;69(1):89-97. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2016.01.008. Epub 2016 Mar 2.
3
Protocol for AREST: Apixaban for Early Prevention of Recurrent Embolic Stroke and Hemorrhagic Transformation-A Randomized Controlled Trial of Early Anticoagulation After Acute Ischemic Stroke in Atrial Fibrillation.
AREST研究方案:阿哌沙班用于复发性栓塞性中风和出血性转化的早期预防——心房颤动急性缺血性中风后早期抗凝的随机对照试验
Front Neurol. 2019 Sep 20;10:975. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00975. eCollection 2019.
Comparison of hospital length of stay between hospitalized non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients treated with either apixaban or warfarin.
接受阿哌沙班或华法林治疗的住院非瓣膜性心房颤动患者住院时间的比较。
Hosp Pract (1995). 2015;43(3):172-9. doi: 10.1080/21548331.2015.1071635. Epub 2015 Jul 27.
4
Propensity scores: Methods, considerations, and applications in the Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery.倾向评分:方法、考虑因素及在《胸心血管外科杂志》中的应用。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015 Jul;150(1):14-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.03.057. Epub 2015 Apr 2.
5
Effect of rivaroxaban versus warfarin on health care costs among nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients: observations from rivaroxaban users and matched warfarin users.利伐沙班与华法林对非瓣膜性心房颤动患者医疗费用的影响:来自利伐沙班使用者和匹配的华法林使用者的观察结果
Adv Ther. 2015 Mar;32(3):216-27. doi: 10.1007/s12325-015-0189-1. Epub 2015 Mar 18.
6
Trends in oral anticoagulant choice for acute stroke patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation in Japan: the SAMURAI-NVAF study.日本非瓣膜性心房颤动急性卒中患者口服抗凝剂选择的趋势:SAMURAI-NVAF研究
Int J Stroke. 2015 Aug;10(6):836-42. doi: 10.1111/ijs.12452. Epub 2015 Jan 12.
7
Efficacy and safety of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants vs. warfarin in Japanese patients with atrial fibrillation – meta-analysis.非维生素K拮抗剂口服抗凝药与华法林对日本房颤患者的疗效及安全性——荟萃分析
Circ J. 2015;79(2):339-45. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-14-1042. Epub 2014 Dec 11.
8
Does warfarin-related intracerebral haemorrhage lead to higher costs of management?
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2014 Nov;126:38-42. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2014.08.022. Epub 2014 Aug 29.
9
Guidelines for Pharmacotherapy of Atrial Fibrillation (JCS 2013).心房颤动药物治疗指南(日本循环学会2013年版)
Circ J. 2014;78(8):1997-2021. doi: 10.1253/circj.cj-66-0092. Epub 2014 Jun 26.
10
Hospital length of stay: is rivaroxaban associated with shorter inpatient stay compared to warfarin among patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation?住院时间:在非瓣膜性心房颤动患者中,与华法林相比,利伐沙班是否与更短的住院时间相关?
Curr Med Res Opin. 2014 Apr;30(4):645-53. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2013.867843. Epub 2013 Dec 5.