1 Department of Trauma Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
2 Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Clin Rehabil. 2019 May;33(5):923-935. doi: 10.1177/0269215519828152. Epub 2019 Feb 6.
To assess test-retest reliability, construct validity and responsiveness of the Dutch Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA-NL) in patients who sustained acute physical trauma.
A longitudinal cohort study.
A level 1 trauma center in The Netherlands.
Patients who required hospital admission after sustaining an acute physical trauma.
Patients completed the SMFA-NL at six weeks, eight weeks and six months post-injury.
The measures used were The Dutch Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment. Test-retest reliability (between six and eight weeks post-injury) using intraclass correlation coefficients, the smallest detectable change and Bland and Altman plots. Construct validity (six weeks post-injury) and responsiveness (between six weeks and six months post-injury) were evaluated using the hypothesis testing method.
A total of 248 patients (mean age: 46.5, SD: 13.4) participated, 145 patients completed the retest questionnaires (eight weeks) and 160 patients completed the responsiveness questionnaires (six months). The intraclass correlation coefficients indicated good to excellent reliability on all subscales (0.80 to 0.98). The smallest detectable change was 17.4 for the Upper Extremity Dysfunction subscale, 11.0 for the Lower Extremity Dysfunction subscales, 13.9 for the Problems with Daily Activities subscale and 16.5 for the Mental and Emotional Problems subscale. At group level, the smallest detectable change ranged from 1.48 to 1.96. A total of 86% of the construct validity hypotheses and 79% of the responsiveness hypotheses were confirmed.
This study showed that the SMFA-NL has good to excellent reliability, sufficient construct validity and is able to detect change in physical function over time.
评估荷兰短肌肉骨骼功能评估(SMFA-NL)在急性物理创伤患者中的测试-重测信度、结构效度和反应度。
纵向队列研究。
荷兰一级创伤中心。
因急性物理创伤而需要住院的患者。
患者在受伤后 6 周、8 周和 6 个月时完成 SMFA-NL。
使用的措施为荷兰短肌肉骨骼功能评估。使用组内相关系数、最小可检测变化和 Bland 和 Altman 图评估 6 至 8 周后受伤时的测试-重测信度。在受伤后 6 周评估结构效度,在受伤后 6 周至 6 个月评估反应度,使用假设检验方法。
共有 248 名患者(平均年龄:46.5,SD:13.4)参与,145 名患者完成了重测问卷(8 周),160 名患者完成了反应性问卷(6 个月)。所有子量表的组内相关系数均表明具有良好至优秀的可靠性(0.80 至 0.98)。最小可检测变化为上肢功能障碍子量表 17.4,下肢功能障碍子量表 11.0,日常活动问题子量表 13.9,精神和情绪问题子量表 16.5。在组水平上,最小可检测变化范围为 1.48 至 1.96。共有 86%的结构效度假设和 79%的反应度假设得到了证实。
本研究表明,SMFA-NL 具有良好至优秀的信度、足够的结构效度,并且能够随时间检测身体功能的变化。