Mangiaracina Floriana, Meiland Franka, Kerkhof Yvonne, Orrell Martin, Graff Maud, Dröes Rose-Marie
Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam University Medical Centers - VUmc, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Centre for nursing Research, Saxion University of Applied Sciences, Deventer/Enschede, the Netherlands.
Int Psychogeriatr. 2019 Sep;31(9):1267-1285. doi: 10.1017/S1041610218001709. Epub 2019 Feb 6.
In order to evaluate interventions promoting social health in people with dementia it is essential to have reliable and valid measures. The present review aims to provide an overview of available instruments for the assessment of two domains of social health in community-dwelling people with mild dementia, i.e., the ability to manage life with some degree of independence (self-management) and participation in social activities.
An electronic search was conducted in the following databases: PubMed, CINAHL, and PsycINFO. Characteristics of the instruments, feasibility and psychometric properties of the instruments included are reported on.
We identified eight instruments measuring aspects of self-management and three instruments measuring social participation. Validity and reliability of self-management instruments varied between moderate and good. Little information was found on the psychometric properties of the instruments for social participation. In general, feasibility and responsiveness data regarding application in community-dwelling people with dementia were scarce for both types of instruments.
Future research into assessment tools for social health should focus on the development of instruments for self-management that also cover the areas of coping with and adapting to the emotional consequences of the disease; instruments for social participation covering the involvement in social interactions that are experienced as meaningful by the person; and on the psychometric properties and responsiveness of instruments. More attention should also be given to the feasibility (ease of use) of these instruments for people with mild dementia, professionals, and researchers.
为了评估促进痴呆症患者社会健康的干预措施,拥有可靠且有效的测量方法至关重要。本综述旨在概述用于评估社区轻度痴呆症患者社会健康两个领域的现有工具,即具备一定程度独立管理生活的能力(自我管理)和参与社会活动的能力。
在以下数据库中进行了电子检索:PubMed、CINAHL和PsycINFO。报告了所纳入工具的特征、可行性和心理测量特性。
我们确定了八项测量自我管理方面的工具和三项测量社会参与的工具。自我管理工具的有效性和可靠性从中等到良好不等。关于社会参与工具的心理测量特性的信息很少。总体而言,这两类工具在痴呆症社区患者中的应用可行性和反应性数据都很匮乏。
未来关于社会健康评估工具的研究应侧重于开发自我管理工具,这些工具还应涵盖应对和适应疾病情感后果的领域;开发社会参与工具,涵盖参与对个人有意义的社会互动;以及关注工具的心理测量特性和反应性。还应更多地关注这些工具对轻度痴呆症患者、专业人员和研究人员的可行性(易用性)。