Suppr超能文献

电子触发非重症监护住院患者感染性休克警报:应用改良全身炎症反应综合征标准的回顾性观察性研究,对手术患者进行深入分析。

Electronically Triggered Sepsis Alert in Non-Intensive Care Inpatients Using Modified Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome Criteria: A Retrospective Observational Study with In-Depth Analysis of Surgical Patients.

机构信息

1 Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minnesota.

2 Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minnesota.

出版信息

Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2019 May/Jun;20(4):278-285. doi: 10.1089/sur.2018.228. Epub 2019 Feb 6.

Abstract

Our center initiated an electronic Sepsis Best Practice Alert (sBPA) protocol to aid in early sepsis detection and treatment. However, surgery alters peri-operative physiology, which may trigger an sBPA for noninfectious causes. This study aimed to provide early evaluation of automated sBPA utility in surgical patients. This study was a retrospective review of the outcomes of patients admitted to the University of Minnesota Medical Center (but not to the intensive care unit) from August 2015-March 2016 and compared how the sBPA performed in those having and not having surgery. An sBPA prompted nursing to draw blood for an immediate lactate assay if two modified systemic inflammatory response syndrome (mSIRS) criteria or three mSIRS criteria within 24 hours after surgery were met. Physicians were notified if the lactate concentration was >2 mmol/L. Further review was performed of data collected prospectively on the surgical patients. A total of 10,335 patients were admitted (2,158 surgery and 8,177 non-surgery). Of these, 33% of the surgery patients and 35% of the patients not having surgery triggered sBPAs. In surgery patients, 13% of lactate concentrations were >2 mmol/L versus 25% in patients not having surgery. An sBPA was triggered more frequently after procedures with a wound class of 4 (5% vs. 2%), emergency operation (23% vs. 10%), and longer operations (280 min vs. 222 min (p < 0.05 for all). Surgery patients triggering sBPAs had longer hospital stays (9.6 vs. 4.4 days; p < 0.05), more surgical site infections (7% vs. 2%; p < 0.05), and a similar mortality rate (3% vs. 4%; p = 0.15) than those who did not trigger an sBPA. An sBPA fired in a third of all inpatients, and an sBPA that prompted lactate measurements was less likely to be abnormal in surgery patients than in those not having surgery. There was no difference in the mortality rate in surgical patients who fired and those who did not; however, the sBPA did identify patients with a more complicated post-operative course. Further refinements of the electronic trigger should increase BPA specificity.

摘要

我们的中心启动了电子脓毒症最佳实践警报(sBPA)协议,以帮助早期发现脓毒症并进行治疗。然而,手术会改变围手术期的生理状态,这可能会导致非感染性原因触发 sBPA。本研究旨在对手术患者的自动 sBPA 实用性进行早期评估。

本研究是对 2015 年 8 月至 2016 年 3 月期间入住明尼苏达大学医学中心(但不住 ICU)的患者进行的回顾性研究,并比较了 sBPA 在手术患者和非手术患者中的表现。如果在手术后 24 小时内满足两个改良全身炎症反应综合征(mSIRS)标准或三个 mSIRS 标准,sBPA 会提示护理人员立即进行乳酸检测。如果乳酸浓度>2mmol/L,则通知医生。对前瞻性收集的手术患者数据进行了进一步回顾。

共收治 10335 名患者(手术 2158 例,非手术 8177 例)。其中,33%的手术患者和 35%的非手术患者触发了 sBPAs。在手术患者中,13%的乳酸浓度>2mmol/L,而非手术患者为 25%。在手术后,手术患者中触发 sBPA 的频率更高,伤口等级为 4(5%比 2%)、急诊手术(23%比 10%)和手术时间较长(280 分钟比 222 分钟(所有 p<0.05)。触发 sBPAs 的手术患者住院时间更长(9.6 天比 4.4 天;p<0.05)、手术部位感染更多(7%比 2%;p<0.05),死亡率相似(3%比 4%;p=0.15)比未触发 sBPA 的患者。sBPA 在所有住院患者中触发了三分之一,并且触发乳酸测量的 sBPA 在手术患者中不太可能异常。手术患者中触发 sBPA 和未触发 sBPA 的死亡率没有差异;然而,sBPA 确实确定了术后病程更复杂的患者。进一步改进电子触发器应提高 BPA 的特异性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验