Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Dig Dis Sci. 2019 Jul;64(7):1938-1944. doi: 10.1007/s10620-019-5474-4. Epub 2019 Feb 6.
Preclinical data demonstrate that activation of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) contributes to mucosal inflammation, and RAS inhibition by angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) improves colitis in animal models. Less is known regarding the effects of RAS inhibition on clinical outcomes in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients.
Evaluate the impact of ACEI and ARB on clinical outcomes in IBD.
Rates of IBD-related hospitalizations, operations, and corticosteroid use were evaluated retrospectively in two groups. First, 111 IBD patients taking an ACEI or ARB were compared to nonusers matched 1:1 based on sex, age, diagnosis, disease location, and hypertension diagnosis. Second, outcomes in a cohort of 130 IBD patients were compared prior to and during ACEI/ARB exposure.
Compared to matched controls, all IBD patients together with ACEI/ARB exposure had fewer hospitalizations (OR 0.26, p < 0.01), operations (OR 0.08, p = 0.02), and corticosteroid prescriptions (OR 0.5, p = 0.01). Comparing outcomes before and during ACEI/ARB use, there were no differences in hospitalizations, operations, or corticosteroid use for all IBD patients together, but patients with UC had increased hospitalizations (0.08 pre- vs. 0.16 during ACEI/ARB exposure, p = 0.03) and decreased corticosteroid use (0.24 pre-ACEI/ARB vs. 0.12 during ACEI/ARB exposure, p < 0.01) during ACEI/ARB use.
IBD patients with ACEI/ARB exposure had fewer hospitalizations, operations, and corticosteroid use compared to matched controls. No differences in outcomes were observed in individuals on ACEI/ARB therapy when compared to a period of time prior to medication exposure.
临床前数据表明,肾素-血管紧张素系统(RAS)的激活会导致黏膜炎症,血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEI)和血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARB)抑制 RAS 可改善动物模型中的结肠炎。然而,关于 RAS 抑制对炎症性肠病(IBD)患者临床结局的影响知之甚少。
评估 ACEI 和 ARB 对 IBD 患者临床结局的影响。
通过回顾性分析,比较了两组 IBD 患者的 IBD 相关住院、手术和皮质类固醇使用情况。首先,将 111 例服用 ACEI 或 ARB 的 IBD 患者与根据性别、年龄、诊断、疾病部位和高血压诊断进行 1:1 匹配的非使用者进行比较。其次,比较了 130 例 IBD 患者 ACEI/ARB 暴露前后的结局。
与匹配对照相比,所有 ACEI/ARB 暴露的 IBD 患者的住院次数(OR 0.26,p<0.01)、手术次数(OR 0.08,p=0.02)和皮质类固醇处方次数(OR 0.5,p=0.01)均减少。比较所有 IBD 患者 ACEI/ARB 暴露前后的结局,住院、手术或皮质类固醇使用均无差异,但 UC 患者的住院次数增加(0.08 例 ACEI/ARB 暴露前 vs. 0.16 例 ACEI/ARB 暴露时,p=0.03),皮质类固醇使用减少(0.24 例 ACEI/ARB 暴露前 vs. 0.12 例 ACEI/ARB 暴露时,p<0.01)。
与匹配对照相比,ACEI/ARB 暴露的 IBD 患者的住院、手术和皮质类固醇使用均减少。与用药前相比,ACEI/ARB 治疗患者的结局无差异。