Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Invest New Drugs. 2019 Dec;37(6):1198-1206. doi: 10.1007/s10637-019-00736-0. Epub 2019 Feb 6.
Background Given the increasing number of available immunotherapeutic agents, more patients are presenting after failing immunotherapy in need of new treatment options. In this study, we investigated the clinical outcomes of patients treated with sequential immunotherapy. Methods We performed a retrospective review of 90 advanced stage cancer patients treated on immunotherapy-based phase 1 clinical trials at Winship Cancer Institute from 2009 to 2017. We included 49 patients with an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-indicated histology. Patients were analyzed based on whether they had received prior ICI. Clinical outcomes were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and clinical benefit (best response of complete response, partial response, or stable disease). Univariate analysis (UVA) and multivariate analysis (MVA) were performed using Cox proportional hazard or logistic regression model. Covariates included age, liver metastases, number of prior lines of therapy, histology, and Royal Marsden Hospital (RMH) risk group. Results The most common histologies were melanoma (61%) and lung/head and neck cancers (37%). More than half of patients (n = 27, 55%) received at least one ICI prior to trial enrollment: ten received anti-PD-1, two received anti-CTLA-4, five received anti-PD-1/CTLA-4 combination, and ten received multiple ICI. In MVA, ICI-naïve patients had significantly longer OS (HR: 0.22, CI: 0.07-0.70, p = 0.010) and trended towards higher chance of CB (HR: 2.52, CI: 0.49-12.97, p = 0.268). Patients who received prior ICI had substantially shorter median OS (10.9 vs 24.3 months, p = 0.046) and PFS (2.8 vs. 5.1 months, p = 0.380) than ICI-naïve patients per Kaplan-Meier estimation. Within the ICI-naïve group, 78% (7 of 9) of patients who received prior interleukin (IL-2) or interferon gamma (IFNγ) experienced disease control for at least 6 months, compared to a disease control rate of 15% (2 of 13) in patients who had received chemotherapy, targeted therapy, or no prior treatment. Conclusions ICI-naïve patients may experience improved clinical outcomes on immunotherapy-based phase 1 clinical trials than patients who have received prior ICI. This may be particularly true for patients who received prior IL-2 or IFNγ. Further development of immunotherapy combination therapies is needed to improve clinical outcomes of these patients. These results should be validated in a larger study.
鉴于越来越多的免疫治疗药物可供选择,更多的患者在免疫治疗失败后需要新的治疗方案。本研究旨在调查序贯免疫治疗患者的临床结局。
我们对 2009 年至 2017 年在温希普癌症研究所(Winship Cancer Institute)进行的基于免疫治疗的 1 期临床试验中接受治疗的 90 例晚期癌症患者进行了回顾性研究。我们纳入了 49 例具有免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)指征的组织学患者。根据患者是否接受过 ICI 治疗进行分析。临床结局包括总生存期(OS)、无进展生存期(PFS)和临床获益(最佳反应为完全缓解、部分缓解或疾病稳定)。采用 Cox 比例风险或逻辑回归模型进行单变量分析(UVA)和多变量分析(MVA)。协变量包括年龄、肝转移、治疗线数、组织学和皇家马斯登医院(RMH)风险组。
最常见的组织学类型为黑色素瘤(61%)和肺癌/头颈部癌症(37%)。超过一半的患者(n=27,55%)在入组前至少接受过一次 ICI 治疗:10 例接受 PD-1 抑制剂,2 例接受 CTLA-4 抑制剂,5 例接受 PD-1/CTLA-4 联合治疗,10 例接受了多种 ICI 治疗。多变量分析显示,ICI 初治患者的 OS 显著延长(HR:0.22,CI:0.07-0.70,p=0.010),且具有更高的 CB 机会(HR:2.52,CI:0.49-12.97,p=0.268)。与 ICI 初治患者相比,接受过 ICI 治疗的患者的中位 OS(10.9 个月 vs 24.3 个月,p=0.046)和 PFS(2.8 个月 vs. 5.1 个月,p=0.380)明显缩短。在 ICI 初治组中,78%(7/9)接受过白细胞介素(IL-2)或干扰素γ(IFNγ)治疗的患者至少有 6 个月的疾病控制,而接受过化疗、靶向治疗或无既往治疗的患者疾病控制率为 15%(2/13)。
ICI 初治患者在接受基于免疫治疗的 1 期临床试验治疗后的临床结局可能优于接受过 ICI 治疗的患者。对于接受过 IL-2 或 IFNγ治疗的患者,这种情况可能更为明显。需要进一步开发免疫治疗联合治疗以改善这些患者的临床结局。这些结果应在更大的研究中得到验证。